Bradley Saunders shock news story

Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Old bones Ian »

British Olympic boxer is being questioned by police on suspicion of dealing cocaine, it emerged today.

Bradley Saunders, 22, who was a medal hope at the Beijing Games, was held after a police sniffer dog found what was believed to be £12,000 of the drug in his back garden.

A warrant was executed at the British light-welterweight champion's semi-detached home in Cragside, Sedgefield, County Durham, at 1pm yesterday.

The boxer was taken away for questioning with his girlfriend Stephanie Elliott, also 22. The couple were held at Spennymoor Police Station and later released on police bail.

The dog alerted officers to a tin which contained more than 300g of white powder. It was sent away for analysis.

Saunders was tipped to bring back a gold medal from the summer games and was criticised after he said he was relieved to be going home to his young family after a shock defeat in his second fight.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Poncey »

:o
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3171
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by deadpan »

He could've helped Frankie Gavin make weight.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26443
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by banjo »

Wasn't expecting this.

I blame the chick, never trust a woman named Stephanie(sorry sis)

:DD
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Wales »

You're not happy with twelve grands worth of beak being found in your hosue, thats for sure.
BAMBI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 595
Joined: 21 Feb 2007, 20:38

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by BAMBI »

Pablo took a shyt in his garden.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by ArtOfWar »

His career is over before it's even got going. What a plank.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Old bones Ian »

Well he's innocent until proven guilty, so his career isn't over yet.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Remember the fuss about lottery funding after the Frankie Gavin weight fiasco ....
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Coco »

stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by stujones »

banjo wrote:Wasn't expecting this.

I blame the chick, never trust a woman named Stephanie(sorry sis)

:DD
Harsh, Stephanie was such a lovely, trusting, girl in Short Circuit!
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Chambers2 »

300g (about 10oz) is alot of snotbag to be caught with, if they can link it to him he'll get at least a few years (dependent on previous convictions)
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by leforge »

He must be a fool!! Also he probably got grassed up by someone.
E
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by E »

leforge wrote:He must be a fool!! Also he probably got grassed up by someone.
Well you know what they say - you get nicked for 2 reasons: in the act or you get grassed.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Coco »

E wrote:
leforge wrote:He must be a fool!! Also he probably got grassed up by someone.
Well you know what they say - you get nicked for 2 reasons: in the act or you get grassed.
Most drugs swoops are intelligence based, they wouldn't turn up mob handed like that on the off chance. Probably jealousy that he is not really working and driving round in Mercedes etc
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by stujones »

Jelously or not, the guy is an idiot and if is guilty deserves a sentence.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Coco »

The burden of proof is important though, finding it in his garden is much different to finding it in his house, as many people would have access to his garden.
Say if I wanted to set him up it would be easy to plant stuff in his garden and make a call to the cops.
They will need more evidence than that, e.g sworn statements, his fingerprints on the gear, unexplained cash in his house, money he can't expain going through his accounts, explain how he can afford any luxury goods, holidays etc
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by stujones »

Coco wrote:The burden of proof is important though, finding it in his garden is much different to finding it in his house, as many people would have access to his garden.
Say if I wanted to set him up it would be easy to plant stuff in his garden and make a call to the cops.
They will need more evidence than that, e.g sworn statements, his fingerprints on the gear, unexplained cash in his house, money he can't expain going through his accounts, explain how he can afford any luxury goods, holidays etc
Oh yes, good points - applogise I should have said "if he is guilty" then he is an idiot and deserves Jail time.

One SUSPECTS that the Police have had their eye on him for a while, cause an athlete should be one of the last people you'd suspect of such dealings, something must have triggered a response and lets hope he hasn't been set up..... if he hasn't, then he deserves to spend some time.

Sorry, I might be a bit prudish, but I think dealers are among the lowest of the low.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by sweetscience »

greedy bastard

£35k tax free on funding plus sponsership (...£65k normal salary), plus alledgedly selling beak, he must be fookin minted.......no wonder he wasnt in a hurry to turn over
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Old bones Ian wrote:Well he's innocent until proven guilty, so his career isn't over yet.
Very true....I wouldnt be surprised if some jealous so called mate stiched him up... We will see!!
berealman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 173
Joined: 01 May 2008, 16:35

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by berealman »

Know he's not been convicted of anything, but I didn't get a good vibe off him
when I saw him in an interview
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Asterix »

Coco wrote:The burden of proof is important though, finding it in his garden is much different to finding it in his house, as many people would have access to his garden.
Say if I wanted to set him up it would be easy to plant stuff in his garden and make a call to the cops.
They will need more evidence than that, e.g sworn statements, his fingerprints on the gear, unexplained cash in his house, money he can't expain going through his accounts, explain how he can afford any luxury goods, holidays etc
Planting £12,000 worth of cocaine is a lot, though. Would someone really sacrifice all that?
hoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 16:58

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by hoot »

good point'an educated guess would say no.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by EddieShredder »

Asterix wrote:
Coco wrote:The burden of proof is important though, finding it in his garden is much different to finding it in his house, as many people would have access to his garden.
Say if I wanted to set him up it would be easy to plant stuff in his garden and make a call to the cops.
They will need more evidence than that, e.g sworn statements, his fingerprints on the gear, unexplained cash in his house, money he can't expain going through his accounts, explain how he can afford any luxury goods, holidays etc
Planting £12,000 worth of cocaine is a lot, though. Would someone really sacrifice all that?
Exactly my thoughts... no-one's gonna plant £12k.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley Saunders shock news story

Post by Spud »

Genuinally shocked.
Post Reply