according to the sun newspaper

boxerbob
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1041
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 18:11

according to the sun newspaper

Post by boxerbob »

floyd mayweather jnr was on £100,000 for the hatton / malignaggi fight???

i thought hed be on more than that??? , did he not ask for $2m to train oscar vs his son???

personally i thought he would be on 250k minimum
boxerbob
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1041
Joined: 30 Oct 2005, 18:11

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by boxerbob »

i know i saw that the other day....reports from america said he got $2.5m....i thought he would have gotten more aswell???
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Gray-Fox »

so what if he was on so little?

he's the trainer, nothing more.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Autobarn »

Non title?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Autobarn »

Yeah but both guys were regarded as champions. Malignaggi was holding the IBF belt recently, and never lost it in the ring. Hatton is regarded as the #1 light welter, The Man at 140, his lineage going back to beating the last major champ at the weight, Tszyu.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by jameswilson »

If you can't believe what you read in The Sun then what can you believe.
Wax On
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 314
Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 08:32

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Wax On »

The most important title was at stake. The ring title. I think we might be getting to the stage where the value of that can't be underestimated. I'm sure that's part the reason Golden Boy bought it.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Captain Hook »

You're probably right, the Ring title seems to be more important than any other at the moment
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Coco »

Wax On wrote:The most important title was at stake. The ring title. I think we might be getting to the stage where the value of that can't be underestimated. I'm sure that's part the reason Golden Boy bought it.
The more times his fighters fight for it the less important it becomes
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by steve689 »

boxerbob wrote:floyd mayweather jnr was on £100,000 for the hatton / malignaggi fight???
Sorry I confused at first but you mean Mayweather SNR bob?? :TU:
Wax On
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 314
Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 08:32

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Wax On »

Coco wrote:
Wax On wrote:The most important title was at stake. The ring title. I think we might be getting to the stage where the value of that can't be underestimated. I'm sure that's part the reason Golden Boy bought it.
The more times his fighters fight for it the less important it becomes
I know what you're trying to say, but as long as the ring maintain their rigid way of crowning a champion at a weight i.e. Contender 1 and 2 fighting if it's a vacant belt or contender 1/2 having to beat the champ to become champ (or something along those lines), then I don't see how Golden boy can harm its credibilty.

What I think we've seen them do quite subtly recently is raise the profile of the ring belts and start to lower the prestige of the other big sanctioning bodies slightly.

Whereas the ring rating used to be just a 'magazine's ratings' they're now gaining credibilty by being supported by the most powerful boxing promotional company in the world. I hope the trend continues, because I'd love to see it become a universally recognised way of crowning champions. Think it's just what the sport needs.
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Gray-Fox »

The Ring title means nothing now Oscar owns it.

Him buying that is like the Government "owning" the BBC.
Maelstrom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 425
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 19:05

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Maelstrom »

Gray-Fox wrote:The Ring title means nothing now Oscar owns it.

Him buying that is like the Government "owning" the BBC.
Good post. Nail on head.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Captain Hook wrote:You're probably right, the Ring title seems to be more important than any other at the moment
Its going down hill fast and soon will be more political garbage when they start charging sanctioning fees and stripping fighters like the other 4 Belts (This is planned apparently)
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Poncey »

At least with RING you don't have super-duper champs, super champ, champs and interim champs.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Coco »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:At least with RING you don't have super-duper champs, super champ, champs and interim champs.

Not yet!!
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Autobarn »

Gray-Fox wrote:The Ring title means nothing now Oscar owns it.

Him buying that is like the Government "owning" the BBC.
I sort of agree. However, it's still better than a WBO title. It does help us distinguish between the achievements of Haye/Hatton/Calzaghe, and say Nicky Cook/Alex Arthur/Scott Harrison. If those guys are getting recognition, respect and money in America, it is a positive thing.

But there are reservations about Ring titles. There are no mandatories. You don't get stripped if you won't fight Mr Dangerous #1 Contender. If Oscar promotes fights for Oscar (oops, Ring) titles, he's not likely to match his fighters with ppl from other promoters (see lightweight and Nate Campbell being isolated from the big names).
Wax On
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 314
Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 08:32

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Wax On »

Gray-Fox wrote:The Ring title means nothing now Oscar owns it.

Him buying that is like the Government "owning" the BBC.
I think that's b0llocks to be fair.

As long as the citeria for crowning a champ stays the same i.e. rigid rules on how a champ can be crowned i.e. by the #1 contender beating the #2 or on rare occasions the #3 etc then Oscar or GB owning it makes no difference.

All it means is that it's becoming a bit more high profile - because they're promoting it as a major belt. And I think that's a good thing!
chesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:05

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by chesh »

It all seems irrelevant when most of the "super" fights are now either at a catchweight or at a traditional weight somehere between the two fighters' natural weight classes!
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Autobarn »

Maybe Oscar can be Ring mag lightweight-light middle Interval-weight Champion? Ring mag, Greedy Bully champion? Ring mag, Oscarweight champion?

After he beats a much smaller Pacquiao.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by DavidPayne »

Wax On wrote:
Coco wrote:
Wax On wrote:The most important title was at stake. The ring title. I think we might be getting to the stage where the value of that can't be underestimated. I'm sure that's part the reason Golden Boy bought it.
The more times his fighters fight for it the less important it becomes
I know what you're trying to say, but as long as the ring maintain their rigid way of crowning a champion at a weight i.e. Contender 1 and 2 fighting if it's a vacant belt or contender 1/2 having to beat the champ to become champ (or something along those lines), then I don't see how Golden boy can harm its credibilty.

What I think we've seen them do quite subtly recently is raise the profile of the ring belts and start to lower the prestige of the other big sanctioning bodies slightly.

Whereas the ring rating used to be just a 'magazine's ratings' they're now gaining credibilty by being supported by the most powerful boxing promotional company in the world. I hope the trend continues, because I'd love to see it become a universally recognised way of crowning champions. Think it's just what the sport needs.
They fkked their cred when they made VK champ
chesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:05

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by chesh »

Autobarn wrote:Maybe Oscar can be Ring mag lightweight-light middle Interval-weight Champion? Ring mag, Greedy Bully champion? Ring mag, Oscarweight champion?

After he beats a much smaller Pacquiao.
:lol: Would love to see Pac whup him (unlikely though that is).
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Gray-Fox »

DavidPayne wrote:They fkked their cred when they made VK champ
Viet Kong Champ?
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by DavidPayne »

Thats the one. Cant see beating retired Colonel Sanders earning anything else?
Wax On
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 314
Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 08:32

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Wax On »

quote]They fkked their cred when they made VK champ[/quote]

Did they?? When???
Post Reply