Does it have to be live?

chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Does it have to be live?

Post by chinny »

That is, is it very important to you that you're watching a fight live? Or is it enough to not know the result?
If it has to be live, why do you think that is?

I used to hate missing the live feel, but with Sky + now it is really basically the same for me if I watch it first thing in the morning not knowing the result. It is only the HUGE fights I'll stay up for now.

Bizzarely, it doesn't work if I'm not watching the 'live recording'. This is because I've convinced myself I can tell from the presenters face what has happened.

I'd be interested to hear what the rest of you think
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Coco »

It doesn't have to be live as long as you live in a cocoon!
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by jameswilson »

Yeah if it isnt live Ill just look the result up.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Chambers2 »

I'm quite happy to watch the fight the following morning, if I can't be arsed with a late one, but I much prefer to watch it live
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26443
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by banjo »

Doesn't matter to me if it's live or if I know the result before watching a rerun, at least I know beforehand if the fights a stinker. The only fights I watch live these days are the ones on at a normal time unless of course someones having a get together and watching the fight as well with a few beers then I'll watch the big ones that are usually 3-4 in the morning jobbies.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Asterix »

I find it quite important. I love knowing that elsewhere in the country/World, the fight is happening almost as I'm seeing it. It feels more personal and exciting.
emma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1421
Joined: 20 Mar 2006, 12:28

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by emma »

I prefer it live.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

I always want to stay upto 4am for the fight rather than watch it the next day, I like the 'being there' feel
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Poncey »

I prefer watching it live at the event to TV. You get a very different view sometimes.

For the US fights I catch them online the next day if they're not on Telly.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Deserter »

Live all the way for me - temptation to find out the result/forward the Sky Plus between round etc gets too much otherwise and it just loses the whole 'event' feel. Love the butterflies/nervous tension in the lead-up to a live fight and no recorded fight I've watched has generated that same level of intensity.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Poncey »

Surely you fast forward the adverts, though?
Mensa07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 618
Joined: 14 Mar 2006, 06:12

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Mensa07 »

depends on the fight for me. Floyd/Hatton I stayed up in the boozer for, but Calzaghe/Jones I'm happy to watch the next morning. I'll always avoid the result in the morning tho till I've watched it, keep tv/radio/pc off etc.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Coco »

I remember staying up for Bruno-Tyson II, even took the night off work for it, McGuigan even managed to convince me Bruno would win.
I had to sit through a dire undercard, I think the show started about 1am and I thought that when the fight was on, instead it came on about 4.30, I had dozed off a couple of times, woke up with my neck in agony, just to see one of the most disappointing events ever
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by sweetscience »

defo has to be live
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by chinny »

Coco wrote:I remember staying up for Bruno-Tyson II, even took the night off work for it, McGuigan even managed to convince me Bruno would win.
I had to sit through a dire undercard, I think the show started about 1am and I thought that when the fight was on, instead it came on about 4.30, I had dozed off a couple of times, woke up with my neck in agony, just to see one of the most disappointing events ever
Really? I thought Bruno-Tyson II was about as exciting as it gets. It almost looked as though Tyson was back.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28487
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Coco »

chinny wrote:
Coco wrote:I remember staying up for Bruno-Tyson II, even took the night off work for it, McGuigan even managed to convince me Bruno would win.
I had to sit through a dire undercard, I think the show started about 1am and I thought that when the fight was on, instead it came on about 4.30, I had dozed off a couple of times, woke up with my neck in agony, just to see one of the most disappointing events ever
Really? I thought Bruno-Tyson II was about as exciting as it gets. It almost looked as though Tyson was back.
Well the fight wasn't at all competitive, Bruno was overawed and folded easily, personally I wasn't concerned about Tyson having another dynasty, I really wanted Big Frank to win
youngrell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2381
Joined: 30 Jun 2008, 15:56

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by youngrell »

Deserter wrote:Live all the way for me - temptation to find out the result/forward the Sky Plus between round etc gets too much otherwise and it just loses the whole 'event' feel. Love the butterflies/nervous tension in the lead-up to a live fight and no recorded fight I've watched has generated that same level of intensity.

I thought I was the only one who got those feelings before a fight. Sometimes (especially if one of my fav fighters are on) I get mental nerves. I often wonder how the hell fighters family and friends cope.

And for me LIVE is the way to do it, even not knowing the result and watching it at a later time there is still something missing, quite strange really. I also get this when watching football.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by whicker »

I'll always check a result rather than watching pre-recorded footage later. The thing with a live event is that you are watching something as it happens- which is the whole point!
doctorboxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by doctorboxing »

I love staying up and watching it live, in the knowledge it is actually happening. That said I often watch a lot of fights on Sunday morning as my fiancee isnt that keen on me staying up most Saturdays until 5am.

If I watch it on a repeat I feel weird shouting or encouraging a fighter forward (something I have no problem doing live) - as if my shouts from across the Atlantic might make a difference if its live!
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by m1kee50 »

Asterix wrote:I find it quite important. I love knowing that elsewhere in the country/World, the fight is happening almost as I'm seeing it. It feels more personal and exciting.
snap, and knowing your mates (online mates/acquaintances) are watching, or ringside, or sometimes in the ring!
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by lefthook82 »

Live KO1 Delayed

I have seen two crackers delayed knowin the result- Mitchell v Johanson and Castillo v Corrales 1. Stil great fights, but probbly would have been in my top 5 if I had let it unfold in front of my eyes rather than know eactky what was going down
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Deserter »

youngrell wrote:
Deserter wrote:Live all the way for me - temptation to find out the result/forward the Sky Plus between round etc gets too much otherwise and it just loses the whole 'event' feel. Love the butterflies/nervous tension in the lead-up to a live fight and no recorded fight I've watched has generated that same level of intensity.

I thought I was the only one who got those feelings before a fight. Sometimes (especially if one of my fav fighters are on) I get mental nerves. I often wonder how the hell fighters family and friends cope.

And for me LIVE is the way to do it, even not knowing the result and watching it at a later time there is still something missing, quite strange really. I also get this when watching football.
Good to know I'm not alone :TU: When Calzaghe got decked by Hopkins I almost couldn't bear to watch the rest of that round and then when Jones put him down I actually couldn't - was just dreading him being stopped so much I basically hid until I heard the bell to end the round go... pathetic :oops:
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by TerribleTerry »

Deserter wrote:Live all the way for me - temptation to find out the result/forward the Sky Plus between round etc gets too much otherwise and it just loses the whole 'event' feel. Love the butterflies/nervous tension in the lead-up to a live fight and no recorded fight I've watched has generated that same level of intensity.
Deserter has it bang on :TU:
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by Goz »

I mainly watch the fights first thing in the morning now. I can't be doing the 5am+ thing these days.

It's ok for me as long as I don't know the result.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Does it have to be live?

Post by black panther »

Nothing like watching it live - I remember watching Hatton-Tszyu live. Can't beat it but as Goz says I really can't be arsed staying up until 4/5am to watch a fight unless its a really big fight these days. I used to go out and then come back and watch the fight but that was a bad idea as I was usually so pissed I'd fall asleep and miss the main event! :lol: I missed the first two rounds of Kessler-Calzaghe because of that but thankfully the voice of John Rawling brought me to my senses by round three.
Post Reply