according to the sun newspaper

WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by WildWaylon »

jameswilson wrote:If you can't believe what you read in The Sun then what can you believe.
What a qualty newspaper tells you, I guess.
Maelstrom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 425
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 19:05

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Maelstrom »

Wax On wrote:
Gray-Fox wrote:The Ring title means nothing now Oscar owns it.

Him buying that is like the Government "owning" the BBC.
I think that's b0llocks to be fair.

As long as the citeria for crowning a champ stays the same i.e. rigid rules on how a champ can be crowned i.e. by the #1 contender beating the #2 or on rare occasions the #3 etc then Oscar or GB owning it makes no difference.

All it means is that it's becoming a bit more high profile - because they're promoting it as a major belt. And I think that's a good thing!
It is just a matter of time before the controversy begins. You wait till the big money matches are in the pipeline, then we will see how those rules are adhered to.
Tykemania
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 15 Nov 2007, 20:22

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Tykemania »

Wax On wrote: Whereas the ring rating used to be just a 'magazine's ratings' they're now gaining credibilty by being supported by the most powerful boxing promotional company in the world. I hope the trend continues, because I'd love to see it become a universally recognised way of crowning champions. Think it's just what the sport needs.
In theory, yes - but only if the ratings are compiled independantly. I think we can all agree that THAT is not the case...
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 14166
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: according to the sun newspaper

Post by Evander »

Maybe Robbie Williams had a beer with a Compton gangster in L.A, swung by the Sun office after a transatlantic flight and told a page 3 girl a rumour he heard.
Thank god it's legitimate.
Post Reply