Never liked JT as a fighter, pampered fighting all the light middles coming through- yes he beat Hopkins ( not in my book) but he is a pampered fighter.
Froch would KO him Mid rounds...IF he beats Pacal...IF!
Is Taylor afraid?
TerribleTerry wrote:Is this a new sport DG - Dooley-baiting?...
In all seriousness though I would want to see the winner on Saturday square off with JT.
Unless Taylor has a huge fight in the pipeline that gives him reason to side step the winner, its a disappointing stance from the Little Rock fighter.
Terry D is a long standing Taylor fan DG so I thought he might jump to JT's defence on this oneDG. wrote:TerribleTerry wrote:Is this a new sport DG - Dooley-baiting?...
In all seriousness though I would want to see the winner on Saturday square off with JT.
Unless Taylor has a huge fight in the pipeline that gives him reason to side step the winner, its a disappointing stance from the Little Rock fighter.
Dooley baiting?
Whats T.Diddly been up to? Well, he had the chance to fightFroch for the belt but fought Taylor for the right to fight the winner of Froch Vs Pacal! Makes no sense because now he won;t fight the winner.....unless it's Pascal? Maybe?
Is he scared of Froch?
I think so!
Maybe, but unless he's got a bigger-money offer, who on earth turns down a WBC title shot TWICE?Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Taylor would use Froch's unprotected chin as target practise, there's probably no money in fighting Froch or Pascal, offer him 5m and he'll take the fight and wip the floor with Frochy if he wins
I have a feeling that he has seen what Andrade nearly did to Bute and has seen that option as 'the path of least resistance'.oliverfennell wrote:Maybe, but unless he's got a bigger-money offer, who on earth turns down a WBC title shot TWICE?Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Taylor would use Froch's unprotected chin as target practise, there's probably no money in fighting Froch or Pascal, offer him 5m and he'll take the fight and wip the floor with Frochy if he wins
Taylor didnt get dropped by Lacy did he? He cant have 2 of the scorecards had him 119-xxx up.Autobarn wrote:Tayor said he wouldn't. Then as recently as last week, said that he would target Froch v Pascal winner. Taylor will be the mandatory for the WBC champ, so there shouldn't be too much to stop it happening. No money? Froch is a puncher with an actual personality, a competitor, and if he has a belt next weekend, there'll be money.
Taylor has a nice jab, can box tidily. But he got dropped by Lacy. Jermain is a "bean counter" style of fighter, who doesn't like real combat, but rather likes to pile up points repetitively; and doesn't have the assertiveness to do more than match his opponent's workrate. He looked weak from rd 5 on vs Lacy, after he got dropped by a right hand. A superfight, i.e. Calzaghe, is a bit in the clouds as Lou DiBella admitted recently.
Taylor has already been bested by Pavlik, and though he may have more energy up at 168 limit, he's not particularly strong at the weight, as he has spent most of his career vs light middleweights.
Froch has the perfect fight to get him up to world class, in Pascal. If he wins, he will likely have learned something new, and go on from strength to strength. Taylor pulls straight back, and is a sitting duck for a basic jab-right cross combination from a tall opponent.
Let's see how Froch does. After the fights, the picture is always a little bit different, sometimes drastically so.
Cheers. Yeah definate knockdown.scotty wrote:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUjTgxVFaZU
Definate knockdown, and a cracking shot aswell from lacy, no idea why the ref overuled it - have a look at 1:20.
Probably because you weren't around then, Robinson and Lamotta ducked Charles Burley and the black murder's row like the plague (well Lamotta fought and lost to Marshall and beat an old Holman Williams)TerribleTerry wrote:I have a feeling that he has seen what Andrade nearly did to Bute and has seen that option as 'the path of least resistance'.oliverfennell wrote:Maybe, but unless he's got a bigger-money offer, who on earth turns down a WBC title shot TWICE?Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Taylor would use Froch's unprotected chin as target practise, there's probably no money in fighting Froch or Pascal, offer him 5m and he'll take the fight and wip the floor with Frochy if he wins
If that IS the case, then it is a disappointing attitude. I can't remember LaMotta, Robinson, Zale or their ilk looking for easy routes through to the top, but there you go - the game has changed.
Don't think the punch connects, off balance, still technically a KD I think though even if the punch only hit Taylor's shoulder when he was off balance.scotty wrote:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUjTgxVFaZU
Looks like a definate knockdown, and a cracking shot aswell from lacy, no idea why the ref overuled it - have a look at 1:20. Although taking a look at the replay the punch doesn't even look like it connects.
I am aware Charles Burley was widely avoided by fighters in his era PN but if Lamotta is guilty of ducking him, then so are Cerdan, Robinson and even lightheavy weight Billy Conn. That fact doesnt mean that they aren't all great fighters, however.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Probably because you weren't around then, Robinson and Lamotta ducked Charles Burley and the black murder's row like the plague (well Lamotta fought and lost to Marshall and beat an old Holman Williams)TerribleTerry wrote: I have a feeling that he has seen what Andrade nearly did to Bute and has seen that option as 'the path of least resistance'.
If that IS the case, then it is a disappointing attitude. I can't remember LaMotta, Robinson, Zale or their ilk looking for easy routes through to the top, but there you go - the game has changed.
Autobarn wrote:Taylor's ready to be taken.
I don't think he's ready for a superfight. He would have no chance up at light heavy. Reckon his options are limited to IBF champ Bute and WBC champ (Froch-Pascal winner).
TerribleTerry wrote:oliverfennell wrote:I have a feeling that he has seen what Andrade nearly did to Bute and has seen that option as 'the path of least resistance'.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
If that IS the case, then it is a disappointing attitude. I can't remember LaMotta, Robinson, Zale or their ilk looking for easy routes through to the top, but there you go - the game has changed.