MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Billy_Boy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 07 Sep 2008, 14:36

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Billy_Boy »

I didn't see the fight but sad to see that Lynes lost; always struck me as being a decent bloke and a hard working pro. I can't help but feel that it's a long way back for him now. :(
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Coco »

In this murky business, ex champions who are considered shot get a lot of title opportunities
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by stujones »

Oh yeah, its not the end of Lynes' opportunities if he wants to continue. Maybe he could fight Barnes in a non title fight.... or even Olusugen for the Commonwealth or Hayward for the English title if he wants a straight forward comeback fight for a title.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by m1kee50 »

I think he can beat a lot of come-forward fighters, he tee'd off on Young Mutley, for example, a big man.

I reckon he might need to look carefully for his next opponent though.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Dioufy »

sligobhoy67 wrote:
Dioufy wrote:If Lynes is really 4/7 then that's very good odds. Paul is largely untested against the type of opponents that Colin has faced, and it will be hard for him because Lynes does have a killer jab and seemingly good fitness. Lynes 117-112 McCloskey.
now you can stop talkin endless amounts of shite
I think that's a little unfair, mate. I got it wrong - it's not the first time and it won't be the last. Unless you get every single prediction right, and I doubt that, then I think you owe me an apology. I doubt I will get it though going off your initial post.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Coco »

Sligo is clearly very passionate about Ireland and Irish boxing
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Dioufy »

Thanks for that, Search.

Getting onto the fight I was impressed with McCloskey. I only gave Lynes the first and the rest to Paul - I couldn't give Colin the 2nd even though he hurt McCloskey badly because Paul dominated the round before and after that punch had landed. Lynes did look old in there and very slow - he also didn't look patient. I thought he would took his time against a smooth counter-punching south-paw and make him come to him, instead of giving McCloskey chances to counter. I don't like how Colin's corner pulled him out too - that's twice he's been retired in the 9th by his corner now. I just feel that Colin could've hurt Paul again because he did have his hands very low and can be caught it patient enough. Perhaps they could've give it two or three more rounds.

I guess it's Barnes next for McCloskey now. I would favour Paul over David, especially with the latter's struggles to make weight - he's not once made it easily since moving down. It's just a shame Paul doesn't carry more power, but he's a talent.
My T Sharp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 16 May 2004, 13:32

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by My T Sharp »

He's got the X-Factor :D
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 998
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by BigEars »

Dioufy wrote:Thanks for that, Search.

Getting onto the fight I was impressed with McCloskey. I only gave Lynes the first and the rest to Paul - I couldn't give Colin the 2nd even though he hurt McCloskey badly because Paul dominated the round before and after that punch had landed. Lynes did look old in there and very slow - he also didn't look patient. I thought he would took his time against a smooth counter-punching south-paw and make him come to him, instead of giving McCloskey chances to counter. I don't like how Colin's corner pulled him out too - that's twice he's been retired in the 9th by his corner now. I just feel that Colin could've hurt Paul again because he did have his hands very low and can be caught it patient enough. Perhaps they could've give it two or three more rounds.
It was technically a corner retirement again but like the Daws fight Lynes told them he couldn't go on.
They were trying to lift him up when he got back to the corner but Lynes had convinced himself he couldn't win and wanted a way out.
I don't mean that in a disrespectful way, Lynes is a commited professional who's fought to a very high level.........but he wanted out.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Dioufy »

I didn't hear that, I'm not saying it didn't happen, but I just didn't hear it. I don't like fighters pulling themselves out of a fight when a major belt is on the line. I like Lynes but for him to do that twice now can only raise questions about his heart.
fatton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 267
Joined: 27 Jun 2007, 18:32

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by fatton »

Dioufy wrote:Getting onto the fight I was impressed with McCloskey. I only gave Lynes the first and the rest to Paul - I couldn't give Colin the 2nd even though he hurt McCloskey badly because Paul dominated the round before and after that punch had landed. Lynes did look old in there and very slow - he also didn't look patient.
I saw McCloskey's fights against Bazan and another half decent Mexican earlier this year and he tends to make his opponents look ponderous.. I still believe Lynes has something left, I just think McCloskey's style frustrated the life out of him and broke his heart. Let's face it with his hands down defence someone is going to catch McCloskey and lay him out but he's fun to watch and there are some good fights at British and European level out there for him.
adamwillan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 19:04

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by adamwillan »

lol Mccloskey is in the xfactor crowd. One of the contestants Ooghan just said well done to my cousin for winning fight last night and camera panned round to him.
housesecond
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 474
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 10:00

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by housesecond »

The impression I got was Mcloskey was blindingly quick with the counters. He could probably shift a few pounds too and he'd be even better at the lower weight.
I always rated Lynes and its hard to tell if he had an off night or PM was just far too good.
dtjenkins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 03 Dec 2008, 18:52

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by dtjenkins »

Just read that Lynes had two failed attempts to make the weight. Do you think this may explain why he looked out of sorts and tired?
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Coco wrote:Sligo is clearly very passionate about Ireland and Irish boxing
dont try and make me out to be some kind of nuthugger for all Irish boxers.

I call fights as I see them - sure I will usually support Irish boxers if they are fighting guys from other nationalities but I am not blinded by a flag. :box:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Dioufy »

Edited by Mod
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Coco »

sligobhoy67 wrote:
Coco wrote:Sligo is clearly very passionate about Ireland and Irish boxing
dont try and make me out to be some kind of nuthugger for all Irish boxers.

I call fights as I see them - sure I will usually support Irish boxers if they are fighting guys from other nationalities but I am not blinded by a flag. :box:
Glad to hear it but you haven't showed this on here, you only turn up when Irish guys are fighting and are very quiet when they lose and aggresively insulting when they win
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by m1kee50 »

Dioufy wrote:You're a pathetic man who only comes out of the woodwork when you're right. You are the type of person that would never acknowledge that they're wrong, but what more do I expect? Just look at your nationality/place you live and my post is justified.
wtf?
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by metropol »

Dioufy wrote:You're a pathetic man who only comes out of the woodwork when you're right. You are the type of person that would never acknowledge that they're wrong, but what more do I expect? Just look at your nationality/place you live and my post is justified.
What does being irish have to do with accepting your wrong?
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Coco wrote:
sligobhoy67 wrote:
Coco wrote:Sligo is clearly very passionate about Ireland and Irish boxing
dont try and make me out to be some kind of nuthugger for all Irish boxers.

I call fights as I see them - sure I will usually support Irish boxers if they are fighting guys from other nationalities but I am not blinded by a flag. :box:
Glad to hear it but you haven't showed this on here, you only turn up when Irish guys are fighting and are very quiet when they lose and aggresively insulting when they win
give me a couple of example then!! come on!
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Dioufy wrote:You're a pathetic man who only comes out of the woodwork when you're right. You are the type of person that would never acknowledge that they're wrong, but what more do I expect? Just look at your nationality/place you live and my post is justified.
spitter that post has just proven my point - you do talk shit!
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Dioufy »

Irish, I have no problems with the Irish at all - it's where you live now that justifies your swearing and insulting. At the end of the day, I got a few fight predictions wrong - it hardly makes me the second coming of Joseph Stalin, does it.
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Dioufy wrote:Irish, I have no problems with the Irish at all - it's where you live now that justifies your swearing and insulting. At the end of the day, I got a few fight predictions wrong - it hardly makes me the second coming of Joseph Stalin, does it.
thats not my problem - you said "You're a pathetic man who only comes out of the woodwork when you're right. You are the type of person that would never acknowledge that they're wrong, but what more do I expect? Just look at your nationality/place you live and my post is justified."

Now back or your statement and give me some example - or are you just talkin SHIT again - yer a fuckin shit talker!
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by Dioufy »

"Now back or your statement and give me some example"

Can you please say that in English, and then I might dignify you with a response.
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: MCCLOSKEY V LYNES BRIT TITLE

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Dioufy wrote:"Now back or your statement and give me some example"

Can you please say that in English, and then I might dignify you with a response.
what part of it didnt you understand you fornicating simpleton?

"You're a pathetic man" - cant be arsed what a gobshite like you think so I will let that slide.

"who only comes out of the woodwork when you're right." - do I, give me a couple of example of when I have done this!

"You are the type of person that would never acknowledge that they're wrong" - do I, give me a couple of example of when I have done this!

"Just look at your nationality/place you live and my post is justified" - I genuinely havent a fornicating clue what that is supposed to mean - please clarify!

Better?
Post Reply