froch - taylor

adamiw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 30 Aug 2003, 17:08

Re: froch - taylor

Post by adamiw »

The Pascal win was a good one, but this is Froch's chance to make a name for himself stateside......I think Taylor's hand speed and competent boxing skills wins a close-ish decision
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Neri »

The fight will really launch Froch's value and name in the US. Big bucks are coming his way if he can continue to seek out the most demanding competition and keep winning. I like Froch and Hennesseys attitude, it's more likely to satisfy the fans, something alot of promoters don't seem to care about.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: froch - taylor

Post by nobby_nobbins »

If Froch can beat Taylor in the US, I think Calzaghe would finally be persuaded to fight him. It would happen in Wales probably in the Autumn.
Maxime
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 05 Apr 2003, 19:02

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Maxime »

I doubt this fight will happen. I'm sure they will negociate for a while but I doubt Dibella/Taylor want to go to England and I doubt HBO really cares about that fight. The money won't be there to get Froch to fight in America.

If they can't reach an agreement during the open negotiation period there will be a purse bid scheduled. There is no chance in hell Dibella will let that fight go to the purse bid. If they can't reach an agreement Dibella will look elsewhere. (Kessler/Bute/etc...)

There is just no way in hell Dibella and Taylor will agree to a 70-30 purse split in favor of Froch.

Even if the winning bid is 2 million dollars. Taylor would only get 600 000$ for the fight.

When was the last time Taylor fought for 600K? Not gonna happen!
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Chambers2 »

"From his comments and the stuff he's said, I don't want to be horrible but I think he's a little bit thick, Joe Calzaghe, I really do," said Froch. "His comments are just absolutely ridiculous so he must be a little bit stupid.

"He talks about fighting Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jr but has he forgotten that Bernard Hopkins is 43 and well, well passed his best.

"He got beat by Bernard Hopkins in not just my opinion but in my other people's opinion, including one of the judges on the night.

"Roy Jones Jr is 39-years-old - I would have taken more pride in refusing a fight with Roy Jones Jr because the guy shouldn't be fighting.

"He says he will knock me out in three rounds but Joe Calzaghe doesn't knock anybody out lately - he slaps for 12 rounds, and against both of his last two opponents he got decked in the first round.

"If I deck him in the first round I'm not going to let him off the hook. If anyone's going to get knocked out in three rounds it's him."
I defy anyone to argue with that ^
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: froch - taylor

Post by m1kee50 »

Just because it's plausible doesn't make it inevitable. As for the stuff about the opponents, yes I'm inclined to agree. Hopkins fought hard for a man of any age, and Jones was a shadow of his former self. This is modern boxing....
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Chambers2 »

Buncey also mentioned that he'd heard rumblings of Taylor-Kessler, so I'm not getting overexcited about Froch-Taylor being up next
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: froch - taylor

Post by m1kee50 »

It seems that you can only fight the biggest names in front of you, else you are a ducker. Taylor is going to have had 2 fights with Pavlik, a win over Jeff Lacy, and now either Froch or Kessler... no difference IMO between the two in terms of rep.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Poncey »

I maintain that Froch needs another World class opponent/win before he can take on one of the two biggest names in the division.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: froch - taylor

Post by m1kee50 »

Terry D wrote: DG thinks he ducked Howard Eastman!
Eastman got off lightly then.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Poncey »

sg1985 wrote:i wouldnt call him world class but sakio bika would be a good fight for froch before he took on taylor or kessler
Bika is a great shout, but it can't be him as he has at least one mandatory defence (I think it's two because he won a vacant title). Manfredo Jr is also retired now. Dirrell or Ward would make interesting fighs, but Dirrell is maybe a bit too green right now.

2 .- Jermain Taylor (US)
4 .- Jeff Lacy (US)
5 .- Karo Murat (Germany) EBU
6 .- Andre Dirrell (US)
7 .- Andre Ward (US)
8 .- Anthony Mundine (Australia)
9 .- Alejandro Berrio (Colombia)
10 .- Marcus Johnson (US)
11 .- Vitaly Tsypko (Ukraine)
12 .- Peter Manfredo Jr. (US) NABF-Interim
13 .- Mads Larsen (Denmark)
14 Stanislav Kashtanov (Ukraine)
15 .- Robert Stieglitz (Germany)
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: froch - taylor

Post by m1kee50 »

Money is on 2/3 from Tsypko, Steiglitz and Larsen then.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Poncey »

Think Larsen is fighting this weekend.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Chambers2 »

Terry D wrote: Let us not get carried away, this forum collectively shot a load in its pants when Witter won the WBC, where did that get him?
Witter does not have a fan-friendly style and he doesn't have a following, these are the 2 main differences between Juniors and Carls situation.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Max Molyneux »

"From his comments and the stuff he's said, I don't want to be horrible but I think he's a little bit thick, Joe Calzaghe, I really do," said Froch. "His comments are just absolutely ridiculous so he must be a little bit stupid.

"He talks about fighting Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jr but has he forgotten that Bernard Hopkins is 43 and well, well passed his best.

"He got beat by Bernard Hopkins in not just my opinion but in my other people's opinion, including one of the judges on the night.

"Roy Jones Jr is 39-years-old - I would have taken more pride in refusing a fight with Roy Jones Jr because the guy shouldn't be fighting.

"He says he will knock me out in three rounds but Joe Calzaghe doesn't knock anybody out lately - he slaps for 12 rounds, and against both of his last two opponents he got decked in the first round.

"If I deck him in the first round I'm not going to let him off the hook. If anyone's going to get knocked out in three rounds it's him."
Other than a light kd, Hopkins did nothing but cry foul, foul himself and hold. He lost widely. Froch also said Lacy would KO Joe at the time that was hyped In a boxing monthly Interview which has pics of him hitting a bag and posing. He's bullshitting In hopes he can get a Calzaghe fight.

The Roy KD was a clear accidental forearm as well shown on the replay.

Calzaghe wouldn't cleanly KO Froch but he could get a TKO If the ref shows Froch mercy and stops It when Joe's overwhelming him with workrate and volume.
Let us not get carried away, this forum collectively shot a load in its pants when Witter won the WBC, where did that get him?
Good point, Witter became even more Inactive since he won that title too yet Hennessey was still mouthing off because of his big ego.

I think Taylor will win, he looked negative at Middleweight but gotten less negative at 12 stone.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: froch - taylor

Post by THEBUTCH »

If a Taylor defence doesn't happen, I reckon be Robert Stieglitz might first up as a voluntary.
Last edited by THEBUTCH on 12 Dec 2008, 10:24, edited 1 time in total.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Autobarn »

I think it might just be best to take the fight. Froch has been an outsider for a very long time. He just won a world title in a thrilling fight. He has that gunslinger style, and may not be around for a long time. We know he has the desire and the hunger.

I don't see Taylor as a massive obstacle. Jermain has looked like he's a bit on the way out, and is a smaller man who has moved up. Obviously, a big test. But Taylor has a similarly wild right hand to Pascal, and if Froch can draw out that right counter, step left and move in behind a long jab he can get Taylor off balance and backing up in straight lines.

I agree with Maxime that this fight will never go to purse bids. However, it is the promoter's job to protect the title (within reason) and to get the best terms for his fighter, so let's not cry fowl if Hennessy tries to negotiate.

Anyway, it's either the direct route to success and stardom or the indirect route - knocking out German mandatories, making fight by fight improvements, drawing big crowds in Notts and on terrestrial TV, and wait for a un ification to get bigger. If Froch, say, beats Stieglitz and maybe Murat, these I believe are Sauerland boys. Sauelerland has probably promoted more super middleweight title fights than anyone. Instead of getting guys ranked that don't have great chances, he may eventually bring in the heavy artillery, and a big name, Abraham.

If it led to that, there would be no complaints. Hennessy's also had 2 of his fighters beaten by Abraham and maybe we'll see that rivalry continue.

While I like Froch's chances in some big fights, Abraham would be very hard (and very exciting). If Carl ever gets KO'd due to that low/no defence, it won't be Taylor, Kessler, Bute, but Abraham.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: froch - taylor

Post by EddieShredder »

Chambers2 wrote:
"From his comments and the stuff he's said, I don't want to be horrible but I think he's a little bit thick, Joe Calzaghe, I really do," said Froch. "His comments are just absolutely ridiculous so he must be a little bit stupid.

"He talks about fighting Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jr but has he forgotten that Bernard Hopkins is 43 and well, well passed his best.

"He got beat by Bernard Hopkins in not just my opinion but in my other people's opinion, including one of the judges on the night.

"Roy Jones Jr is 39-years-old - I would have taken more pride in refusing a fight with Roy Jones Jr because the guy shouldn't be fighting.

"He says he will knock me out in three rounds but Joe Calzaghe doesn't knock anybody out lately - he slaps for 12 rounds, and against both of his last two opponents he got decked in the first round.

"If I deck him in the first round I'm not going to let him off the hook. If anyone's going to get knocked out in three rounds it's him."
I defy anyone to argue with that ^
:lol: "I think he's a little bit thick" :lol: Quality.

And people wonder why I hate Calzaghe :twisted:
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Finch »

Max Molyneux wrote:
"From his comments and the stuff he's said, I don't want to be horrible but I think he's a little bit thick, Joe Calzaghe, I really do," said Froch. "His comments are just absolutely ridiculous so he must be a little bit stupid.

"He talks about fighting Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jr but has he forgotten that Bernard Hopkins is 43 and well, well passed his best.

"He got beat by Bernard Hopkins in not just my opinion but in my other people's opinion, including one of the judges on the night.

"Roy Jones Jr is 39-years-old - I would have taken more pride in refusing a fight with Roy Jones Jr because the guy shouldn't be fighting.

"He says he will knock me out in three rounds but Joe Calzaghe doesn't knock anybody out lately - he slaps for 12 rounds, and against both of his last two opponents he got decked in the first round.

"If I deck him in the first round I'm not going to let him off the hook. If anyone's going to get knocked out in three rounds it's him."
Other than a light kd, Hopkins did nothing but cry foul, foul himself and hold. He lost widely. Froch also said Lacy would KO Joe at the time that was hyped In a boxing monthly Interview which has pics of him hitting a bag and posing. He's bullshitting In hopes he can get a Calzaghe fight.

The Roy KD was a clear accidental forearm as well shown on the replay.

Calzaghe wouldn't cleanly KO Froch but he could get a TKO If the ref shows Froch mercy and stops It when Joe's overwhelming him with workrate and volume.
Let us not get carried away, this forum collectively shot a load in its pants when Witter won the WBC, where did that get him?
Good point, Witter became even more Inactive since he won that title too yet Hennessey was still mouthing off because of his big ego.

I think Taylor will win, he looked negative at Middleweight but gotten less negative at 12 stone.
Good post lad.

Whilst i'm not sure Calzaghe would knock CF out, he would batter him over 12 rounds. Froch was tired after round 3 last week, Calzaghe's work rate and pressure would be too much for Froch.

Calzaghe is right, Froch has nothing to offer. He's moved onwards and upwards literally - i would actually like to see the fight happen because i know that JC's record will still be in tact. Absolutely no doubts whatsoever, but why should he ? He doesn't bering "big name status" and tehrefore money, he brings a world title Joe has vacted. There'll always be another Froch coming through but Joe's been there probably too many times.

If JC beats him, then everyone will say he's not a big name, he can't win either way..................................

Except he can, he's won 46-0 !

fornicate off Froch you big mouth shithouse.
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: froch - taylor

Post by WildWaylon »

Chambers2 wrote:
"From his comments and the stuff he's said, I don't want to be horrible but I think he's a little bit thick, Joe Calzaghe, I really do," said Froch. "His comments are just absolutely ridiculous so he must be a little bit stupid.

"He talks about fighting Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones Jr but has he forgotten that Bernard Hopkins is 43 and well, well passed his best.

"He got beat by Bernard Hopkins in not just my opinion but in my other people's opinion, including one of the judges on the night.

"Roy Jones Jr is 39-years-old - I would have taken more pride in refusing a fight with Roy Jones Jr because the guy shouldn't be fighting.

"He says he will knock me out in three rounds but Joe Calzaghe doesn't knock anybody out lately - he slaps for 12 rounds, and against both of his last two opponents he got decked in the first round.

"If I deck him in the first round I'm not going to let him off the hook. If anyone's going to get knocked out in three rounds it's him."
I defy anyone to argue with that ^
I will, in part. I agree Calzaghe doesnt KO people anymore but he would be far too fast for Froch and would get it on points. Froch has terrible defense and would be an easy target for Calzaghe. No way would Froch KO Calzaghe even if he caught him clean. Calzaghe isnt thick by any means but he is inclined like his Father to say the odd silly thing. Although Calzaghe beat Kessler I see them as pretty even, and I cant see how Froch can beat either of them. Having got there I think Froch will have a difficult time with the divisions best. Hopkins despite his age proved he still has it by beating Pavlik the way he did. RJJ was a money fight as was Hopkins. Comming to the end of his career money and retiring undefeated are Joes priorities. Fighting Froch if he decides to do so is nowhere near as risky as when he fought Kessler and I think Calzaghe could quite well do a Lacy on Froch.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Finch »

Good post WW.

Froch had the bare faced cheek to tell Calzaghe to get in line if he wants to fight him.

Get real Froch, compared to Joe Calzaghe, a legend, you're a complete nobody. Calzaghe is a Light Heaveyweight these days, if you wanna fight him, you better get a few names and a title under your belt after moving up a weight (which you say you won't do) to get it, but don't hang about cos Joe certainly ain't gonna !!

If Froch was anything but English he wouldn't even be on the radar, it's only cos he's English he reckons the fans wanna see it. No Carl we don't because we don't want to see Joe C fight any nobody's.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: froch - taylor

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Finch wrote:Good post WW.

Froch had the bare faced cheek to tell Calzaghe to get in line if he wants to fight him.

Get real Froch, compared to Joe Calzaghe, a legend, you're a complete nobody. Calzaghe is a Light Heaveyweight these days, if you wanna fight him, you better get a few names and a title under your belt after moving up a weight (which you say you won't do) to get it, but don't hang about cos Joe certainly ain't gonna !!

If Froch was anything but English he wouldn't even be on the radar, it's only cos he's English he reckons the fans wanna see it. No Carl we don't because we don't want to see Joe C fight any nobody's.
Froch is just trying to call Joe out, what do you expect him to do, write a polite letter which his mum countersigns, and then sent it to Joe?

This is boxing, not crown green bowls mate.

I'd rather watch Froch than Calzaghe any day, Joe is boring as hell these days.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: froch - taylor

Post by DG. »

Terry D wrote:According to the increasingly out-of-it DG Taylor is a 'ducker', how does he work that out? If Lou gives Taylor Froch Taylor will fight Froch, if he gets Kessler he will take on Kessler, without a murmur. Taylor gets shit for no good reason.

DG, we know it is down to madness but how can you justify claiming that Hatton is a 'ducker' for not fighting Witter and Taylor is one for fighting every name put in front of him. You can't piss and moan that no one takes tough fights any more then knock Taylor, it is nonsensical.
He only wants Froch because he looked beatable the other night.

He DUCKED out of fighting Eastman!


He DUCKED out of fighting Froch before.


Call Him Donald Duck!


:D
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26443
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: froch - taylor

Post by banjo »

DG. wrote:
Terry D wrote:According to the increasingly out-of-it DG Taylor is a 'ducker', how does he work that out? If Lou gives Taylor Froch Taylor will fight Froch, if he gets Kessler he will take on Kessler, without a murmur. Taylor gets shit for no good reason.

DG, we know it is down to madness but how can you justify claiming that Hatton is a 'ducker' for not fighting Witter and Taylor is one for fighting every name put in front of him. You can't piss and moan that no one takes tough fights any more then knock Taylor, it is nonsensical.
He only wants Froch because he looked beatable the other night.

He DUCKED out of fighting Eastman!


He DUCKED out of fighting Froch before.


Call Him Donald Duck!


:D
Quack, quack
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: froch - taylor

Post by Finch »

I said he was a nobody "compared to calzaghe"

James - he may be calling him out, but there's way's to do it, and there's ways to make yourself look like a twat, in this case, Froch thinks Joe wants him. :bow: As for Joe being a boring fighter, a 100 odd punches a round from someone that takes the fight to people, doesn't hold whose speed is untouchable, both his punching speed and his reflexes, someone who has an astute boxing brain and who thinks on the spot tactically to adapt to any given situation and adversity and find a way to win, and win convincingly i wouldn't call boring.

Audley Harrison is boring.
Post Reply