Hagler2002 wrote:Christmas day and the added bonus is Kell Brook is on the undercard against Antonio Margarito!emma wrote:when is this fight?
really?
Hagler2002 wrote:Christmas day and the added bonus is Kell Brook is on the undercard against Antonio Margarito!emma wrote:when is this fight?
It is emma, they have rescheduled American TV and rearranged it around Elizabeth's rant.emma wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Christmas day and the added bonus is Kell Brook is on the undercard against Antonio Margarito!emma wrote:when is this fight?
really?well i hope its on after the queen speech.
Lacy vs Calzaghe wasn't just a hard fight for Lacy - it was a kicking.A fight that could have been stopped as early as the 4th or 5th and somehow lasted the distance. We will never know exactly how much that fight took out of Lacy - cause alot of people, myself included, bought the Lacy hype over beating a shot and disinterested Reid (as subsequent fights showed) and a shot Pemberton (as subsequent fights showed).Twinkle Toes wrote:I dunno if I agree with that Stu - Getting hit on the chin hard is going to have a negative effect, the important point being that some fighters can withstand a bit more than another. I think we can agree that Lacy was finished as a fighter after what Calzaghe did to him, and that was one fight.
Cotto was beaten up pretty badly I thought, mix in the mental issues, and he could be on the slippery slope. Cotto is also easy to hit, even when he was battering Gomez he still had his lip busted up, and that was what many perceived as being totally one sided.
I think Jennings can do himself proud here, if anything it is the lack of seasoning which is going to let him down.
Hagler2002 wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:
Christmas day and the added bonus is Kell Brook is on the undercard against Antonio Margarito!It is emma, they have rescheduled American TV and rearranged it around Elizabeth's rant.emma wrote:really?well i hope its on after the queen speech.
yep.McCannW14 wrote:One word for this fight.
Mismatch.
the ones who are good enuff.Old bones Ian wrote:We all moan that our top boxers don't go for the top world boxers, and are content to go for the WBU type titles, then when we have one of our lot go against a genuine world class boxer, people moan about it.
People aren't moaning about that at all, they're moaning (justifiably) about Jennings being 'thrown to the lions' rather than having his career built up properly to prepare him for this level.Old bones Ian wrote:We all moan that our top boxers don't go for the top world boxers, and are content to go for the WBU type titles, then when we have one of our lot go against a genuine world class boxer, people moan about it.
well said mateblack panther wrote:To be fair I think he's what, 31 now? Hardly time to build up your career - he might as well go for it and sure most likely he'll get beat, and beat bad but theres a small chance he could cause cotto a few problems. Even if he's gets beaten easily at least he can say he fought one of the best in the world - no shame in coming up short against a fighter like that. He could well still be unbeaten right now so its not like he's found his level. I think its worse to never test yourself and fight anyone remotely world class your whole career whilst going unbeaten.
You're both missing the point... the contention among most on here is that it should never have reached this stage and Jennings should have been brought along at a better pace throughout his career to date.Old bones Ian wrote:well said mateblack panther wrote:To be fair I think he's what, 31 now? Hardly time to build up your career - he might as well go for it and sure most likely he'll get beat, and beat bad but theres a small chance he could cause cotto a few problems. Even if he's gets beaten easily at least he can say he fought one of the best in the world - no shame in coming up short against a fighter like that. He could well still be unbeaten right now so its not like he's found his level. I think its worse to never test yourself and fight anyone remotely world class your whole career whilst going unbeaten.
I remember the same tired arguments coming out regarding the Pavlik vs Lockett fight and how Lockett had a 'puncher's chance'.Old bones Ian wrote:Its boxing, if i was squeamish i wouldn't watch it at all, for me its no different from watching a hot prospect fight a journeyman.
But now and again the journeyman wins, thats one of the reasons we always watch boxing.
Terry, I think your Mancunian bias is getting the better of you here. Just how has Jennings 'worked' for that rankingTerry D wrote:What is the alternative? Ban title holders from fighting supposedly mediocre guys? Allow them to fight catchweight fights against badly faded old men for fight after fight? Cotto is coming off a devastating loss. He is taking on a highly ranked contender. No problem with that.
Jennings may be unfashionable, fighting a contender from your own division (one who has boxed other men in the division over a period of time) may be unfashionable. Yet we do need these type of fights to take place. Otherwise you sit there watching guys like Moore, Froch (until recently) and every British fighter who deserves a shot sitting around watching the world and his, smaller, uncle get a shot at the titles they contend for.
People cannot bitch and moan about bodies cooking their rankings to accommodate lighter/smaller/retired men, only to then throw the toys out of the pram when a ranking guy, one who has worked for that ranking, gets a shot at a title.
you arnt serious right? of course its NOT.junior pepa seed wrote:Mike will get smashed cotto is to strong and mike has nothin in the arsenal too trouble him cotto world class jennings euro div.
Is kell brook v margarito on same card 4 real what ch?