The issue I have with this fight, is that Jennings' does not deserve to be in WBO top 10 (its not his fault though), and the sport is devauled by this. In his own mind, I'm sure he thinks he's world class, and maybe he is, though I've not seen anything to suggest that he is. One things for sure,Deserter wrote:Terry, I think your Mancunian bias is getting the better of you here. Just how has Jennings 'worked' for that rankingTerry D wrote:What is the alternative? Ban title holders from fighting supposedly mediocre guys? Allow them to fight catchweight fights against badly faded old men for fight after fight? Cotto is coming off a devastating loss. He is taking on a highly ranked contender. No problem with that.
Jennings may be unfashionable, fighting a contender from your own division (one who has boxed other men in the division over a period of time) may be unfashionable. Yet we do need these type of fights to take place. Otherwise you sit there watching guys like Moore, Froch (until recently) and every British fighter who deserves a shot sitting around watching the world and his, smaller, uncle get a shot at the titles they contend for.
People cannot bitch and moan about bodies cooking their rankings to accommodate lighter/smaller/retired men, only to then throw the toys out of the pram when a ranking guy, one who has worked for that ranking, gets a shot at a title.?
We don't need these types of matches to take place at all - mismatches are what gives boxing a bad name, as well as the 'badly faded old men' that you reference.
he will be in superb shape for this chance - he's a hungry fighter, though I do see him getting beaten, as he's not boxed top level guys before. He's had a very sheltered career, and thus the impressive record.
Cotto stops him with body shots - 3 rounds.