Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

punchers chance
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 693
Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 18:37

Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by punchers chance »

Anybody know if this is being shown on TV?
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Max Molyneux »

Sentanta has a deal with Sauerland I thino so It will be on there.
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by chinny »

Max Molyneux wrote:Sentanta has a deal with Sauerland I thino so It will be on there.
I think that deal starts in 2009 - don't think this is on anywhere. I don't want to see it myself.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Matt W »

Can't believe anybody would want to see a legend of the sport getting battered by a man with hairy shoulders. Why Holyfield, why??? :witzend:
belowthebelt
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 142
Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 16:22

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by belowthebelt »

valuev - ruiz 2 was shown on nuts tv ( channel 196 on sky) so maybe they'll show this freakshow
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by bennie »

Freakish Russian Nikolai Valuev defends his WBA heavyweight title against American veteran Evander Holyfield in a mismatch in Zurich, Switzerland, on December 20.
The 7ft Valuev, who weighs in at 23 stone, takes on a former cruiserweight who stands just 6ft 2ins and weighs 15 stone. Worse, Holyfield is 46 years old, has not won a fight since June 2007 and is obviously, clearly, blatantly, horribly, undeniably, irrefutably, totally past his best.
He is finished.
Christmas comes early for the 35-year-old Valuev, 49-1 (34), but the rest of us have to sweat over the outcome and the course of this one before we can sit down to the turkey. Valuev, known as "The Beast from the East", looks a much-improved fighter from the rather lumbering giant outfoxed and outpointed by Hamburg's Ruslan Chagaev in April 2007 in Germany, for his only defeat. He took on trainer Alexander Zimin afterwards, a fellow Russian, and has picked up three solid wins with an impressive and surprising blend of skill, stamina and aggression (including a thumping left jab), although his major strength is still just that, his major strength. He also still knows how to intimidate. Given his obvious improvement and everything else, Valuev might just be right at his peak.
It all contrasts painfully with the Holyfield story, a man with only one fight to show for the last 18 months and none at all this year so far. Evander lost that one fight, too: another Russian, Sultan Ibragimov, outscored him over 12 rounds in October 2007 in Moscow. Ibragimov is small, smart, a boxer type. He was content to outbox Holyfield.
One hopes Valuev is content to do the same.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by steve689 »

This really is a horrible fight. Even Valuev himself, and one of his Russian trainers, admitted they didn't want it when it was first talked about a few months back. Cynical matchmaking, trading off a legends' name it almost belongs in the recent Jeff Fenech-Azumah Nelson III category with regards to bad taste.

What next? Evander Holyfield V Riddick Bowe 4 :cry:
scrap iron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 407
Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 17:38

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by scrap iron »

steve689 wrote:This really is a horrible fight. Even Valuev himself, and one of his Russian trainers, admitted they didn't want it when it was first talked about a few months back. Cynical matchmaking, trading off a legends' name it almost belongs in the recent Jeff Fenech-Azumah Nelson III category with regards to bad taste.

What next? Evander Holyfield V Riddick Bowe 4 :cry:
Yeah, a bit like when a couple of years ago Joe Calzaghe said he wouldn't "touch" Roy Jones because he was too shot.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by steve689 »

Well I can't possibly comment on that... :lol:
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by HomicideHenry »

Can't believe anybody would want to see a legend of the sport getting battered by a man with hairy shoulders. Why Holyfield, why???
What do u have against hairy shoulders??? :x
Cannibal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1432
Joined: 12 Jul 2003, 20:41

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Cannibal »

Almost tempted to bet on Holyfield. Valuev struggled with Ruiz and Larry Donald. Maybe Holyfield could hit and hold his way to an upset. 6/1 is worth a bet I think.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by HomicideHenry »

Even if Evander wins, I couldnt put his win over Foreman's win against Moorer. If he does win, he should A) retire, or B) fight Chagaev for undisputed WBA title, then retire. Its only right.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by ALI »

Like everybody else who follows this sport, i wish Hollyfield would hang them up. But i wish him one last hurrah this Saturday evening, i hope he lands the bingo punch and slays the beast from the east. I cant be bothered with Valuev at all!
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by steve689 »

I actually like Valuev so I hope he wins this one. Just imagine how much more deluded Holyfield might become as well if he actually pulled it off and won a belt... :o The mind boggles.
Eraserhead
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 554
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Eraserhead »

Maybe Nuts TV will jump on it?

To be honest, I'm not even interested in the result, let alone pursuing the chance to watch it live on TV.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by ArtOfWar »

To be honest I've stopped caring about whether Holyfield retires or not, this saga has been going on for about 5 or 6 years now. In fact people wanted him to retire even before he fought Tyson which was over ten years ago. What is annoying is the fact that he keeps getting title shots. That's just an absolute joke.
Herol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 105
Joined: 05 Dec 2008, 05:37

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Herol »

Anyone who watches this should be ashamed. Someone needs to stop Holyfield from fighting.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Poncey »

Eraserhead wrote:Maybe Nuts TV will jump on it?

To be honest, I'm not even interested in the result, let alone pursuing the chance to watch it live on TV.
Nuts TV is dead I think.

As far as I know, you can only get it with one of those motorised satellites.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Poncey »

fight news has details of how to view trhis online.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by stujones »

Nuts isn't dead yet, but it is not on its schedules.

Watch out for Sky Sports though, Sky sports news are talking about this fight alot. Nothing yet, but we all know they only talk about their own fights, and they are giving it as much coverage as the bill tonight.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

steve689 wrote:This really is a horrible fight. Even Valuev himself, and one of his Russian trainers, admitted they didn't want it when it was first talked about a few months back. Cynical matchmaking, trading off a legends' name it almost belongs in the recent Jeff Fenech-Azumah Nelson III category with regards to bad taste.

What next? Evander Holyfield V Riddick Bowe 4 :cry:
Don't Joke mate, I can see that fight happening.

I just hope Evander doesn't get badly hurt.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by stujones »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:fight news has details of how to view trhis online.
I cannot see the detaills, but can for the skelton fight - any ideas if this is going to be on UK TV?
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Poncey »

stujones wrote:
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:fight news has details of how to view trhis online.
I cannot see the detaills, but can for the skelton fight - any ideas if this is going to be on UK TV?
:evil: It's been removed. And I didn't pay attention for what to do. Damnit!

Ps, as you asked
The WBC may fine or DQ Sugar Shane Mosley after court documents revealed that Mosley testified that he injected himself with the performance enhancing substance EPO before his second fight with Oscar De La Hoya in 2003. Mosley seized both the WBC and WBA super middleweight titles held by De La Hoya in that bout. "It was a real surprise to read that Mosley has confessed that he did take those medicines, those drugs that are totally prohibited by the WBC," WBC president Jose Sulaiman told the NY Daily News. "The WBC rules state that we must have a hearing. This is a matter of serious concern to us." The WBC legal counsel is currently gathering evidence on Mosley to present to the WBC Board of Governors. Shane is scheduled to challenge WBA welterweight champion Antonio Margarito on January 24th.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by Matt W »

HomicideHenry wrote:
Can't believe anybody would want to see a legend of the sport getting battered by a man with hairy shoulders. Why Holyfield, why???
What do u have against hairy shoulders??? :x
Nothing personal, I'm just not into the 'Bigfoot & The Hendersons' look. Having said that, I suppose it gives the ladies something to grab onto for a bit of leverage... :D :TU:

Fact is those hairy shoulders are the most outstanding thing about Valuev.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Holyfield v Valuev - TV Coverage

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Matt W wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:
Can't believe anybody would want to see a legend of the sport getting battered by a man with hairy shoulders. Why Holyfield, why???
What do u have against hairy shoulders??? :x
Nothing personal, I'm just not into the 'Bigfoot & The Hendersons' look. Having said that, I suppose it gives the ladies something to grab onto for a bit of leverage... :D :TU:

Fact is those hairy shoulders are the most outstanding thing about Valuev.
Dunno mate, his brow is pretty exceptional.
Post Reply