Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
He was so crap in that 1st fight that he just didn't deserve it IMO. Cunningham just doesn't gel well with Wlodarczyk for some reason. No arguments re the 2nd fight though. Wlod looked like he wanted to go home, by the midway point. Thankfully he convinced in the 2nd fight.
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Mosley v wright
Mosley v DLH 2?
Casamayor v Frietas
Corrales V Castillio
Mosley v DLH 2?
Casamayor v Frietas
Corrales V Castillio
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Mosley vs Wright 1 - yes good call I think.
Mosley vs DLH 2 - no, it was at Light Middle - Mosley hadn't properly fought there.
Casamayor vs Freitas - Mayweather was still the champion at the time.
castillo vs corrales - yes.
Mosley vs DLH 2 - no, it was at Light Middle - Mosley hadn't properly fought there.
Casamayor vs Freitas - Mayweather was still the champion at the time.
castillo vs corrales - yes.
-
belowthebelt
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 142
- Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 16:22
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
[quote="brian13]
If you hold a WBO title and that is the only title you have held you will not be number 2[/quote]
joe calzaghe only had the wbo title for years but i wouldnt put anybody in the rest of that division above him
If you hold a WBO title and that is the only title you have held you will not be number 2[/quote]
joe calzaghe only had the wbo title for years but i wouldnt put anybody in the rest of that division above him
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
I think Ottke should have been ranked about Joe for the most part of their respective reigns, especially when Ottke partially unified.
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
belowthebelt wrote:joe calzaghe only had the wbo title for years but i wouldnt put anybody in the rest of that division above him
Lacy was probably put ahead of him and I think Kessler was aswell
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Mosley v Mayweather.
Pacman has ony had 1 meaningful fight at Welter
Pacman has ony had 1 meaningful fight at Welter
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Martinez v Williams 2 ?
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
One almighty bump
I'll add Taylor v Prograis
Usyk v Gassiev
I'll add Taylor v Prograis
Usyk v Gassiev
-
james5000+
- Middleweight
- Posts: 78
- Joined: 18 Apr 2014, 21:55
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Lol really???
There was a unified champ by the name of Jose Ramirez that can be ranked no lower than 2 but must certainly should be considered no1.
Ramirez will beat those two chaps at the same time
There was a unified champ by the name of Jose Ramirez that can be ranked no lower than 2 but must certainly should be considered no1.
Ramirez will beat those two chaps at the same time
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Fair point actually
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Usyk v Gassiev - I think they had to be consensus 1 and 2 at the time.
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Wilder vs fury?
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Froch v Ward ?
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Canelo v Golovkin ?
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Klit v Povetkin
-
Lenny Cravats
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 8088
- Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
Pretty sad indictment of the sport, this.
Frampton - Santa Cruz?
Frampton - Santa Cruz?
Re: Fights between consensus 1 and 2 in the division
I think only Juan Francisco Estrada v Sor Rungvisai would be the only one in 2019 to date.