No bullshit. Its his real name>>>>>
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?t ... man:220458
Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
-
The Scranton Assassin
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 199
- Joined: 20 Jul 2004, 13:15
-
purple.obi
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 65
- Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 05:50
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
yea, not much of a puncher but the guy had balls.
-
The Scranton Assassin
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 199
- Joined: 20 Jul 2004, 13:15
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Perhaps he could even have become a member or the Hall Of Fame?oliverfennell wrote:A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Nah, he was a stiff.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Perhaps he could even have become a member or the Hall Of Fame?oliverfennell wrote:A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
-
belowthebelt
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 16:22
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Flump wrote:Nah, he was a stiff.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Perhaps he could even have become a member or the Hall Of Fame?oliverfennell wrote:A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
He was better than a stiff. That's a blow below the belt.