Khan's next opponent: Marco Antonio Barrera!

MightyWarrior · Post by **MightyWarrior** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:30

Odds will be close I'd say, it's a hard one to predict. I'd not be surprised to see a faster/bigger Khan batter a suddenly old looking MAB from a distance ( MAB has got zero to gain from this fight ) and you'd obviously not be too amazed to see MAB time Kahn's attack and chin him a good one.
Freddie Roach probably had input in suggesting this fight, and as we know, he's a good judge at picking the right fights.

It's an excellent fight to look forward to in 09. and thank feck for that.

overhand_right · Post by **overhand_right** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:37

Freddie Roach is excellent at picking the right fights and judging old fighters, he hand picked Danny Williams to fight his 38 yr old 'reborn' Mike Tyson...

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:38

Wax On wrote:No win fight for Khan.

If he loses everyone says 'I told you so......he's am an overhyped chinless loser'

If he wins everyone says Barrerra is shot, too old and fighting way above his natural weight.

Can't see the fight happening tbh, but maybe FWank should get a little bit of credit if this comes off??? Maybe not

Entirely disagree with that assessment.

If he wins, he has beat a living legend, and one who isn't shot either by any reasonable definition.

If he loses - well, he's lost to a four weight world champion.

terminator · Post by **terminator** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:40

overhand_right wrote:Freddie Roach is excellent at picking the right fights and judging old fighters, he hand picked Danny Williams to fight his 38 yr old 'reborn' Mike Tyson...

It's a shame Roach was unable to predict Tyson picking up a knee injury in the fight

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:41

If I was creating a book for this I would go Khan 1.7, Barrera 2.6, 33/1 Draw

Dirk Kelly · Post by **Dirk Kelly** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:41

Can't see this ever happening, MAB will take the gameplan that Gomez had and excute it to perfection, Khan won't know what to defend, the body, the head, the body and before you know it he'll be on the floor and his 'horrible sweater' wearing father will be trying to jump through the ropes ala Limond fight.

I'm so confident that this fight won't come off that I've agreed to drive Emerson to it wearing a dress.

Wax On · Post by **Wax On** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:44

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Wax On wrote:No win fight for Khan.

If he loses everyone says 'I told you so......he's am an overhyped chinless loser'

If he wins everyone says Barrerra is shot, too old and fighting way above his natural weight.

Can't see the fight happening tbh, but maybe FWank should get a little bit of credit if this comes off??? Maybe not
Entirely disagree with that assessment.

If he wins, he has beat a living legend, and one who isn't shot either by any reasonable definition.

If he loses - well, he's lost to a four weight world champion.

James, I probably disagree with the statements myself, but I know that 95% of posters on here will say what I said rather than what you said after the fight, because of all the negativity that follows Khan on these boards!

Max Molyneux · Post by **Max Molyneux** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:45

terminator wrote:
overhand_right wrote:Freddie Roach is excellent at picking the right fights and judging old fighters, he hand picked Danny Williams to fight his 38 yr old 'reborn' Mike Tyson...
It's a shame Roach was unable to predict Tyson picking up a knee injury in the fight

The same Tyson In that fight lost to McBride so Danny would of won anyway.

Dirk Kelly · Post by **Dirk Kelly** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:45

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Me too mate. That's why I can't understand the logic of FW allowing one of his fighters to go on ITV in a big domestic fight the same night as his own card.

Just. Plain. Odd.

Suppose Fwank believes that Khan vs. MAB will be a bigger draw than Elcock vs. Macklin and if Macklin wins he's British champ if he loses the papers and on-line will be all about Khan vs. MAB result so its a good gamble for him. Is Macklin back to Sports Network now? He's fought for and on some many promoters cards its hard to keep track!

Bomber 1 · Post by **Bomber 1** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:56

Maklin is a sports network fighter and I think it's a fantastic match for Amir and after spending time with him in the gym it's a fight he'll win I feel!!

My T Sharp · Post by **My T Sharp** » 15 Jan 2009, 09:57

Good fight this

Twinkle Toes · Post by **Twinkle Toes** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:02

gobbles wrote:
Twinkle Toes wrote:Oh! - A 34 year old super featherweight.

Even so, it is still a good name for Khan to have on his record.

Come off it, this is a fantastic match. Casamayor is older, so is Marquez and Nate Campbell. Any of those, plus Barrera, would be a fabulous fight. I hope it's right!

I didn't say it was a bad match up - I'm being tongue in cheek more than anything, but those are facts that I have stated :)

Shirow · Post by **Shirow** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:02

Khan had great size and speed advantages over a declined Gomez. That won't be enough against MAB. He'll either wait patiently to catch Amir's shots then counter with deadly accuracy or put on pressure and wait for him to panic and smash him.
I didn't see Barrera's fight in China but i can't imagine that there was evidence of such a shottage that suggest Khan could have an easier time than he had with Gomez.

Matthew Hatton v Ben Tackie was a well calculated risk this seems deranged. Maybe Warren thinks he's more trouble than he's worth unless he can make a fortune out of him this year so the kid gloves are off.

I'll definitely be buying a ticket (immediately after the weigh-in has taken place)

metropol · Post by **metropol** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:07

Where would everyone think this fight might be? Is it big enough to hold outdoors?

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:10

From William Hill

KHAN AMIR BEAT LEGEND BARRERA?

AMIR KHAN is set for a sensational next fight, taking on seven times World Champion, Marco Antonio Barrera - one of the all time greats, who finished the career of Prince Naseem. And William Hill believe Khan has a real chance of winning the fight against the 34 year old, making Barrera 1/2 favourite, with Khan 6/4 and the draw a 20/1 chance. 'As Oscar de la Hoya showed recently, fighters often grow old in the ring and suddenly find they have nothing left in the tank. Barrera has had a long, active career and just might find Khan's speed and power overwhelming him. But he also has great experience and will know that Khan can be knocked out, so Amir will have to come of age and fulfill his full potential to win this one' said Hill's spokesman Graham Sharpe. Hiills make Barrera 11/8 to win by knockout, with Khan 9/2 to do likewise.
WILLIAM HILL ODDS:
1/2 Barrera v Khan 6/4 - Draw 20/1
11/8 Barrera by KO/TKO
11/4 Barrera on Points
9/2 Khan by KO/TKO
3/1 Khan on Points
Further information......graham sharpe...0208 918 3731

metropol · Post by **metropol** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:14

kevin wrote:From William Hill

KHAN AMIR BEAT LEGEND BARRERA?

AMIR KHAN is set for a sensational next fight, taking on seven times World Champion, Marco Antonio Barrera - one of the all time greats, who finished the career of Prince Naseem. And William Hill believe Khan has a real chance of winning the fight against the 34 year old, making Barrera 1/2 favourite, with Khan 6/4 and the draw a 20/1 chance. 'As Oscar de la Hoya showed recently, fighters often grow old in the ring and suddenly find they have nothing left in the tank. Barrera has had a long, active career and just might find Khan's speed and power overwhelming him. But he also has great experience and will know that Khan can be knocked out, so Amir will have to come of age and fulfill his full potential to win this one' said Hill's spokesman Graham Sharpe. Hiills make Barrera 11/8 to win by knockout, with Khan 9/2 to do likewise.
WILLIAM HILL ODDS:
1/2 Barrera v Khan 6/4 - Draw 20/1
11/8 Barrera by KO/TKO
11/4 Barrera on Points
9/2 Khan by KO/TKO
3/1 Khan on Points
Further information......graham sharpe...0208 918 3731

There is decent odds for someone who thinks khan will win . It may shorten quickly

sweetscience · Post by **sweetscience** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:15

Wax On wrote:No win fight for Khan.

If he loses everyone says 'I told you so......he's am an overhyped chinless loser'

If he wins everyone says Barrerra is shot, too old and fighting way above his natural weight.

Can't see the fight happening tbh, but maybe FWank should get a little bit of credit if this comes off??? Maybe not

ste, its only lose lose on here

to the khan fan base its win win

Herol · Post by **Herol** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:47

Does Khan really have that much to lose at this stage, if he loses to a legend like Barrera? As long as he lasts more than 60 seconds this time he'll have at least done better than vs Prescott.

It reminds me a bit of Haye's fight with Carl Thompson where he arguably gained from losing his unbeaten record.

Bomber 1 · Post by **Bomber 1** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:55

Herol wrote:It reminds me a bit of Haye's fight with Carl Thompson where he arguably gained from losing his unbeaten record.

I agree with this statement..It's a calculated risk..No one would be moaning if Barrera was fighting Casamayor but people moan when he's fighting Amir..I personally think we should all get behind Amir as the kid is all heart and wants to do well..

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:58

From allegedly.tv - "A "big four" title holder at super-bantamweight, featherweight and super-featherweight, Barrera is a veteran of more than 20 world title fights"

IE, not a natural lightweight? What (if any) difference will that make?

Lenny · Post by **Lenny** » 15 Jan 2009, 10:58

You do get some comedy from some people. Fight a Fagin type and it's "Ha, another bum, Khan will win easily, crap matchmaking". Fight Barrera and it's "Ha, Khan is getting knocked out, he's a bum, crap matchmaking".

He certainly draws strong emotions from people

metropol · Post by **metropol** » 15 Jan 2009, 11:05

Herol wrote:Does Khan really have that much to lose at this stage, if he loses to a legend like Barrera? As long as he lasts more than 60 seconds this time he'll have at least done better than vs Prescott.

It reminds me a bit of Haye's fight with Carl Thompson where he arguably gained from losing his unbeaten record.

Yes he does in the eyes of the general public that have no idea of how boxing works and unless you go unbeaten your no good(although hes already lost the 0) A defeat in this fight would be disasterous imo in the eyes of the public

pasty_spud · Post by **pasty_spud** » 15 Jan 2009, 11:20

i reckon khan will knock him out

Bard of Boxrec · Post by **Bard of Boxrec** » 15 Jan 2009, 11:27

wow, stingy odds from hills. The odds will surely lengthen for Barrera when the flood of misinformed hype money goes on Khan?

it would have been interesting to see the odds had Khan not lost to Prescott.

gobbles · Post by **gobbles** » 15 Jan 2009, 11:29

Herol wrote:Does Khan really have that much to lose at this stage, if he loses to a legend like Barrera? As long as he lasts more than 60 seconds this time he'll have at least done better than vs Prescott.

It reminds me a bit of Haye's fight with Carl Thompson where he arguably gained from losing his unbeaten record.

Carl Thompson is no Barrera in a million years

Khan's next opponent: Marco Antonio Barrera!

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)

Re: Khan's next opponent (Banjo might not want to read)