100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
It's the centennial of the Tommy Burns v Jack Johnson bout in Sydney Australia. I found this article an interesting read on the event.
http://angryfightfan.wordpress.com/2008 ... tters-bay/
http://angryfightfan.wordpress.com/2008 ... tters-bay/
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
I also read an article in the local paper with the titleLes Darcy wrote:It's the centennial of the Tommy Burns v Jack Johnson bout in Sydney Australia. I found this article an interesting read on the event.
http://angryfightfan.wordpress.com/2008 ... tters-bay/
"Australia commemorates Canadian's historic fight" - i.e. Johnson vs Burns.
My only problem with the article is it gave the appearance that Jack Johnson was the first
black fighter to win a world title and be in a inter-racial title bout.
It seems even the Canadian press overlooked the great GEORGE DIXON (aka Little Chocolate).
Not only did George win one title,but he won a second and the rest is real boxing history,
not history for the convenience of a good story to remember something that happened 100
years ago.
-
ben geoghegan
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 151
- Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 22:33
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
I think they meant heavyweight
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
With all due respect to "them", it's not what they meant, but what a story indicates.ben geoghegan wrote:I think they meant heavyweight
The reader of a newspaper shouldn't have to guess what the meaning of the words are.
It is always nice to read about positive boxing stories in the "local rag", but
not at the expense of greats like George Dixon, Joe Gans or Joe Walcott.
The logical conclusion is the local paper ran with a nice "Canwest News Service" story
without checking the facts. As a minimum, it would have been cool for a Canadian newspaper
to add a footnote about Canada and Boston's pwn GEORGE DIXON.
Last edited by Zelley on 30 Dec 2008, 21:02, edited 1 time in total.
-
ben geoghegan
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 151
- Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 22:33
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Have you seen the footage of Dixon in an exhibition (term used loosely)?
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
It is probable that the heavyweight title bout between Jack Johnson and Tommy Burns was the most significant sports event ever staged in Australia due to the fact that Johnson became the first black man to win the title and went on to be such an important figure in history.
- Chuck Johnston
- Chuck Johnston
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
After the omission was brought to his attention, the author edited his piece to acknowledge the earlier achievements of Messrs. Dixon, Gans and Walcott.Zelley wrote:With all due respect to "them", it's not what they meant, but what a story indicates.ben geoghegan wrote:I think they meant heavyweight
The reader of a newspaper shouldn't have to guess what the meaning of the words are.
It is alwats nice to read about positive boxing stories in the "local rag", but
not at the expense of greats like George Dixon, Joe Gans or Joe Walcott.
The logical conclusion is the local paper ran with a nice "Canwest News Service" story
without checking the facts. As a minimum, it would have been cool for a Canadian newspaper
to add a footnote about Canada and Boston's pwn GEORGE DIXON.
http://angryfightfan.wordpress.com/2008 ... tters-bay/
You can thank me later.
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
The author editing his story is the right thing to do, but not sure all the newspapers running the story will do a follow-upraylawpc wrote:After the omission was brought to his attention, the author edited his piece to acknowledge the earlier achievements of Messrs. Dixon, Gans and Walcott.Zelley wrote:
With all due respect to "them", it's not what they meant, but what a story indicates.
The reader of a newspaper shouldn't have to guess what the meaning of the words are.
It is always nice to read about positive boxing stories in the "local rag", but
not at the expense of greats like George Dixon, Joe Gans or Joe Walcott.
The logical conclusion is the local paper ran with a nice "Canwest News Service" story
without checking the facts. As a minimum, it would have been cool for a Canadian newspaper
to add a footnote about Canada and Boston's pwn GEORGE DIXON.
http://angryfightfan.wordpress.com/2008 ... tters-bay/
You can thank me later.
The funny or crazy side of the story is it is claimed that the Johnson - Burns fight was held in Australia because several cities around the world refused to hold an inter-racial fight.
Funny thing is that many locations held inter-racial bouts before and after December 26, 1908.
e.g. July 4, 1908: Battling Nelson KO's Joe Gans, San Francisco.
e.g. Dec. 21, 1908: Sam Langford KO's Jim Flynn, San Francisco
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Pleased to report, the local newspaper mentioned George Dixon in the January 6 th issue
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Anyone know what is at the present site of the stadium(which was built just for that fight).
Perhaps a Super-Walmart or an Out Back Steakhouse?
Perhaps a Super-Walmart or an Out Back Steakhouse?
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Sydney Stadium was built in 1908, but the first major event there was Burns' bout with Bosher Bill Squires in August, not Burns-Johnson in December. The Stadium eventually got a roof. It endured to the mid-1970s when it was demolished to make way for an elevated railway.Brutu wrote:Anyone know what is at the present site of the stadium(which was built just for that fight).
Perhaps a Super-Walmart or an Out Back Steakhouse?
Last edited by raylawpc on 08 Jan 2009, 10:00, edited 1 time in total.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
The city also hosted an Olympics, though.Chuck1052 wrote:It is probable that the heavyweight title bout between Jack Johnson and Tommy Burns was the most significant sports event ever staged in Australia due to the fact that Johnson became the first black man to win the title and went on to be such an important figure in history.
- Chuck Johnston
-
ben geoghegan
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 151
- Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 22:33
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
I'd go with the Olympics too
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
I thought about the two Olympics staged in Australia , but Jack Johnson was such a pivotal sports figure in history, which wouldn't have happened if he hadn't become the first black world heavyweight champion. As a result, I feel the bout between Johnson vs. Tommy Burns was the most historically significant Australian sports event in history by a huge margin.
- Chuck Johnston
- Chuck Johnston
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
It's certainly a unique event, what transpired, I'll give you that, as opposed to the Olympics, which happen with routine, though they are immeasurably bigger global events than Johnson-Burns was (even for its time).
The Olympics happen every four years, & have happened twice in Australia. You're certainly not going to be able to say that of Johnson-Burns, so it is the more historic event in that case. It's also the only Heavyweight championship bout in the history of the country, someone correct me if I'm wrong? Pretty sure. It'll most likely be the last, too.
The Olympics happen every four years, & have happened twice in Australia. You're certainly not going to be able to say that of Johnson-Burns, so it is the more historic event in that case. It's also the only Heavyweight championship bout in the history of the country, someone correct me if I'm wrong? Pretty sure. It'll most likely be the last, too.
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Burns vrs Johnson
Tale of the Tape
Tommy Burns/ Jack Johnson
age.. 27/ / age ..30
height.. 5 ft.7.25 / height.. 6 ft. 1.75
weight.. 176 lbs/ weight... 196 lbs
reach... 74.5 inches/ reach.. 72.75 inches
forearm... 12 inches/ forearm.. 13 inches
biceps... 13.25 in./ biceps.. 14.5 in.
chest...40.5 inches/ chest 43.5 inches
Tale of the Tape
Tommy Burns/ Jack Johnson
age.. 27/ / age ..30
height.. 5 ft.7.25 / height.. 6 ft. 1.75
weight.. 176 lbs/ weight... 196 lbs
reach... 74.5 inches/ reach.. 72.75 inches
forearm... 12 inches/ forearm.. 13 inches
biceps... 13.25 in./ biceps.. 14.5 in.
chest...40.5 inches/ chest 43.5 inches
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Here is a bump to another past thread(2008) on the subject.
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
Actually, Burns had a couple of previous defenses in Australia. He beat Billy Squires (their 3rd fight) and Bill Lang in Sydney.Goodnight, Irene wrote:It's certainly a unique event, what transpired, I'll give you that, as opposed to the Olympics, which happen with routine, though they are immeasurably bigger global events than Johnson-Burns was (even for its time).
The Olympics happen every four years, & have happened twice in Australia. You're certainly not going to be able to say that of Johnson-Burns, so it is the more historic event in that case. It's also the only Heavyweight championship bout in the history of the country, someone correct me if I'm wrong? Pretty sure. It'll most likely be the last, too.
Re: 100 years since Johnson defeated Burns
What was considered Australia's biggest sporting event prior to Johnson-Burns?
As far as show business,I think it may have been the Cole Bros.Circus visiting from America in 1881.
As far as show business,I think it may have been the Cole Bros.Circus visiting from America in 1881.