hatton pac-man off

Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Asterix »

Finch wrote:
Asterix wrote:
Finch wrote:Ah, my mistake, sorry. Would that be at 140 ?
Yep. Hatton won't go lower than 140 lbs, imo.
OK, my original point still stands, the only person left for Hatton after beating Mallignagi at 140 was the Pacman, if he wont fight him, then Hatton should move up and on towards someone like Cotto / Margarito, not fights moving up to his weight class.
Well, there's the winner of Bradley vs Holt. If Kotelnik beats Maidana then he's very worthy.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26446
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by banjo »

DG. wrote:
banjo wrote:Both as bad as each other really
At last!


:TU:
It's quite simple really, they should sign a contract - winner gets 60% loser gets 40%

simple
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by dondada »

banjo wrote:
DG. wrote:
banjo wrote:Both as bad as each other really
At last!


:TU:
It's quite simple really, they should sign a contract - winner gets 60% loser gets 40%

simple
Yeah...would that be so bad?
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Asterix »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
banjo wrote:It's quite simple really, they should sign a contract - winner gets 60% loser gets 40%

simple
Yeah...would that be so bad?
Well, Hatton wants more than 40%.

:P
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by DG. »

Asterix wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
banjo wrote:It's quite simple really, they should sign a contract - winner gets 60% loser gets 40%

simple
Yeah...would that be so bad?
Well, Hatton wants more than 40%.

:P

:lol:
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5453
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by forcefraser »

Hatton will fight De La Hoya at 147. Nothing more sure than that.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by DG. »

forcefraser wrote:Hatton will fight De La Hoya at 147. Nothing more sure than that.
I hope the 2 of them knock each other out!


:lol:
BigGar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 356
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by BigGar »

Absolutely gutted. Cheers fighters.
Was going to be my first trip to Vegas and I'm well hacked off.
DaveyH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 15:47

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by DaveyH »

I totally agree with ForceFraser. Seems to me like this fight "falling through" will somehow justify Oscar stepping in and fighting Hatton, which was the original plan until Pac refused to follow the script.
BigGar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 356
Joined: 29 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by BigGar »

DaveyH wrote:I totally agree with ForceFraser. Seems to me like this fight "falling through" will somehow justify Oscar stepping in and fighting Hatton, which was the original plan until Pac refused to follow the script.

Could well be right! Thing is I expect a lot of people have no real interest in seeing De La Hoya v Hatton. Mind you, non hardcore fans will probably not even know that De La Hoya got hammered last time so they could get away with it!!
Cannibal
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1432
Joined: 12 Jul 2003, 20:41

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Cannibal »

HATTON TO TAKE ON KHAN/BARRERA WINNER

All seemed lost for The Hitman when his showdown with P4P #1 Manny Pacquiao fell through, but he found some consulation with another potential blockbuster summer fight that would see him return to the UK for the first time since his win over Juan Lazcano last year.

The potential fight could see Hatton once again do business with his former promoter, but his father Ray doesn't believe that this will be a problem.

"Once the money is on the table, we're open to it. Khan is one of the best pound for pound British fighters out there and it would be a classic derby, Manchester against Bolton. Ricky is really keen to return to the M.E.N and repay all those fans who have been loyal to him throughout the years, and have waited since the Tszyu fight for us to bring home another fight of that magnitude, this would be a spectacle to rival that."

On Barrera.

"Yeah, that would be huge. It wasn't long ago that he went 12 hard rounds against Pacquiao... I actually had him winning on my card. You don't get more world class than Barerra, and in my honest opinion, that would actually be a bigger fight for Ricky at this stage of his career. He has handled lightweight with ease, and I feel he'd make the step up to 140 just as easily."

We'll keep you up to date with the latest on this breaking news story.

SOURCE: alledgedly boxing
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Shirow »

Jesus. :x
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by gobbles »

bet the fight still goes ahead
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by p4p1 »

Cannibal wrote:HATTON TO TAKE ON KHAN/BARRERA WINNER

All seemed lost for The Hitman when his showdown with P4P #1 Manny Pacquiao fell through, but he found some consulation with another potential blockbuster summer fight that would see him return to the UK for the first time since his win over Juan Lazcano last year.

The potential fight could see Hatton once again do business with his former promoter, but his father Ray doesn't believe that this will be a problem.

"Once the money is on the table, we're open to it. Khan is one of the best pound for pound British fighters out there and it would be a classic derby, Manchester against Bolton. Ricky is really keen to return to the M.E.N and repay all those fans who have been loyal to him throughout the years, and have waited since the Tszyu fight for us to bring home another fight of that magnitude, this would be a spectacle to rival that."

On Barrera.

"Yeah, that would be huge. It wasn't long ago that he went 12 hard rounds against Pacquiao... I actually had him winning on my card. You don't get more world class than Barerra, and in my honest opinion, that would actually be a bigger fight for Ricky at this stage of his career. He has handled lightweight with ease, and I feel he'd make the step up to 140 just as easily."

We'll keep you up to date with the latest on this breaking news story.

SOURCE: alledgedly boxing
:o
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Neri »

:-?
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by states »

I presume Cannibal has just made that up....
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Hagler2002 »

I wasn't aware the fight was ever on :o
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by ALI »

They both come across as being greedy bast**** in my opinion. 52/48 or 55/45, who gives a flying fcuk, if either man fancies the job they should have accepted the offer.

What will either of them do now? Pacquio has no superfight available that i can see, so he's likely to be getting only 15% to 30% of what he would have against Hatton. As for Hatton, he's at the tailend of his career and its apparent to most that he needs Pacquio much more than the Pacquio needs Hatton. Who's he going to fight next? Marquez seems the only viable name IMO and he's sure to get only a fraction of what he would have against Pacquio for that one, but the fight is likely to carry the same risk factor.

Its madness, and all for a few dollars more. Greedy bast****!!!

We should all boycott their next fights :lol:
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by dondada »

ALI wrote:They both come across as being greedy bast**** in my opinion. 52/48 or 55/45, who gives a flying fcuk, if either man fancies the job they should have accepted the offer.

What will either of them do now? Pacquio has no superfight available that i can see, so he's likely to be getting only 15% to 30% of what he would have against Hatton. As for Hatton, he's at the tailend of his career and its apparent to most that he needs Pacquio much more than the Pacquio needs Hatton. Who's he going to fight next? Marquez seems the only viable name IMO and he's sure to get only a fraction of what he would have against Pacquio for that one, but the fight is likely to carry the same risk factor.

Its madness, and all for a few dollars more. Greedy bast****!!!

We should all boycott their next fights :lol:
Have to echo your frustration here. For all the 'I want to fight the best' bollocks, it's almost always about money.

I've heard Pacquiao might fight Valero. Now, you have to say, that would be good.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26446
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by banjo »

I think it's quit pathetic how they are moaning about money when the economy is the way it is at the moment. It doesn't matter if the split is 50/50, 55/45, 60/40 or whatever they are both still going to make millions.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Shirow »

I don't think it's about money but pride. They both have more money than they know what to do with it's just they both want the other side to back down and refuse to lose face even if that means giving up a multi million payday.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Chambers2 »

I'm hoping Mayweather and Manny can do business (preferreably at 140), that'd be a special fight
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Poncey »

Has Valero been medically cleared in the US yet?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Autobarn »

Pac got greedy. Even his promoter Arum admitted it was Pac asking for too much that caused the problems. It was Pacquiao's fault.

However, what a lost opportunity for Hatton, just over a few percent. He had a decent chance of beating the smaller man, and could have used that to go into something massive where he was the legit draw.

I'm not convinced Ricky is a superstar outside the UK yet - he looked great v Malignaggi, but the one massive event he was in he was thoroughly beaten (Mayweather).

So now he's fighting Pac's leftover crums, the remains of DLH perhaps? What kind of draw is DLH after getting anihillated by the much smaller Pacquiao?

If Diaz beats Marquez, I can see Diaz being a good opponent for Hatton. Diaz is a potentially marketable guy if he has a name like JMM on his list of scalps. Action fighter, exciting, well behaved college boy image (and all that crap). But this is IF he beats Marquez.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: hatton pac-man off

Post by Poncey »

Two problems I have the Valero rumour; 1) I thought Edwin wasn't medically cleared to fight in the US. 2) The TR lawyer (Bill Whatisface) said Pacman couldn't make 135 anymore.

My money's on him fighting Floyd.
Post Reply