jamesmcdonnell wrote:Jay Larkin told me that American audiences LOVE hatton fights, because of the drama of their setting, and they love his style of fighting too.
Now this sort of comment is common on the forums and come from an interpretation the 'boxing public' that I just don't agree with.
Forum users are always going on about how recent shows are conning the 'boxing public' who want to see more interesting fights. Nope. The people who are missing out are the Boxing Die-hards/enthusiasts/fanatics. These people have a very small amount of power in boxing. It's the ordinary punters, those who have heard of Tyson, Lennox and Nas, they are the ones with the power. It's their money that is wanted.
When Javid Khaliq fights, it's the 400 pakistani Taxi drivers. When Hatton fights, it's the 3,000 pissed up Manc with their tarts. They hold the power as far as Audience (&PPV) is concerned.
American audiences LOVE Hatton? English audiences barely know who Hatton is (remember, I'm not talking about ordinary sport lovers, not Boxrec forum users). American Boxing Press probably loves Hatton. American knowledgeable fans probably love Hatton, but the wider public (who's buy in you need to make PPV work)??? No way, I don't believe that.
PPV is about general sports fans paying to watch boxing. It's not about boxing fans.
Look at the PPV in this country. Pretty much the only PPVs since Nas have been for the HW Championship or Tyson. These are big names. Hatton does not fall into this category in this country or the US. Ever heard Hatton's name mentioned in the Sports round up of the National News...ever? He is simply not big time.
Also "Setting"??? What, the MEN?!?