General consensus that you disagree with

THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by THEBUTCH »

Yep, I can vouch for that. Whether Graham Earl won fairly or not, you'd always say he lost, regardless :wink:
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by yiddo14 »

Holyfield won the 2nd Holy-Lewis fight.

Holyfield only won that fight if you honestly scored the first one a draw...

Lewis won both, he just pissed the first one :TU:
mark thompson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 662
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by mark thompson »

Rendall Munroe only got a MD over Kiko Martinez it was clearly a UD and how one of the judges scored it a draw is beyond me .
Goz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3490
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:17

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by Goz »

I thought Trinidad beat De La Hoya, Morales sneaked the first MAB fight and Lewis-Holy 1 was very close (and I'm considered a Lennox fan!).

And I have watched these fights more than once.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by steve689 »

oliverfennell wrote:Not really a general consensus issue, but I never change my prediction AFTER a fight. If I get it wrong, so be it, but when you read any of these forums after an upset, you'd swear 90% of the posters ALWAYS knew it was going to happen :roll:
I knew you were going to say that.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

cotto has a bad chin
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by lefthook82 »

That Roy Jones would have handled Calzaghe easily in his prime. He may win, but he won't be putting his hand behind his back ala Glen Kelly. It would be hard fought and he would get landed on regurlarly
Punchy Joe
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 25 Feb 2007, 10:17

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by Punchy Joe »

Mike Tyson was/is not a great fighter.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by Dioufy »

thunderfromdownunder wrote:cotto has a bad chin
I agree. Of course, he isn't a Margarito or Toney in the whiskers department but he can take a shot. Judah and Torres hurt him but he still took what they had to offer. And he took a hell of a lot against Margarito in the 5th and still stayed up.
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by harrygreb »

i disagree with the whole concept of a "general concensus" and i'm sure most of you are with me on that one.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by oliverfennell »

THEBUTCH wrote:Yep, I can vouch for that. Whether Graham Earl won fairly or not, you'd always say he lost, regardless :wink:
LOL You'd argue he deserved the nod over Khan! ;)
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by ALI »

I strongly disagreed with 99% of everyone on here when Magee challanged Froch for the British title. I had been predicting for a long time that Froch was not all that he was hyped up to be and now, finally, Magee would be the man to expose the myth. I even went as far as starting several new threads on the matter declaring the end of the line for the Froch bandwagon and all its followers. :oops:

To be fair to myself though :DD Magee was doing a good job of outboxing Froch at times, which was what i was expecting to happen. He just did'nt have the raw grit and toughness or power that Froch had. Eventually, as most were pointing out to me on here before the fight, Froch would eventually catch up with him and Magee's brittle chin would let him down.

Fair play to Froch, he's proved me very wrong. I'll never be his biggest fan, but i have warmed to him over time, even more so since that real gutsy performance against Pascal for the WBC belt. Still think he would struggle against the likes of Kessler or Taylor, but there will be no more bold Froch predictions comming from me anymore :lol:
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Re: General consensus that you disagree with

Post by harrygreb »

i disagree that arthur abraham won fairly in the amazing fight against miranda
Post Reply