Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post Reply
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Finch »

Calzaghe's retirement is breaking news on Setanta and interviews going on right left and centre to talk about him.

Not even mentioned on SSN. :roll:

I e-mailed Sky asking the questions about their lack of coverage towards world champions in JC and Carl Froch, and potential World Champions in David Haye, they didn't reply. :box:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Hagler2002 »

Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Finch »

Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Should ITV not acknowledge Premiership football ?

Should Sky not acknowledge the World Cup ?

Should the BBC not acknowledge the Champions League in football focus ?
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by dondada »

Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Then don't claim to be a sports news service.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by leforge »

Its on there website. He had many fights on there channels.
Wake up call
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1178
Joined: 10 Feb 2008, 11:10

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Wake up call »

Sky never give credit to other networks or people associated with them.

Rupert Murdoch is the anti-christ.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by steve689 »

Wake up call wrote:Sky never give credit to other networks or people associated with them.

Rupert Murdoch is the anti-christ.
Thought that was Richard Dawkins :D
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by gobbles »

Sky Sports News is a sad excuse for journalism. What's their email address?
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by oliverfennell »

I remember SSN giving a lot of coverage to Tyson's retirement, when the fight that prompted it (McBride) had been on Setanta the previous night.

I don't see any reason why Sky should ignore Calzaghe's retirement announcement. I can see the point about "competition", but if he's not going to fight again, they're not promoting another channel, are they?
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Finch »

gobbles wrote:Sky Sports News is a sad excuse for journalism. What's their email address?
http://www.skysports.com/contactus/0,20299,,00.html

I filled this in however they just ignored it. pudenda.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Hagler2002 »

Finch wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Should ITV not acknowledge Premiership football ?

Should Sky not acknowledge the World Cup ?

Should the BBC not acknowledge the Champions League in football focus ?

I fail to see your point, do ITV have a weekly premiership round up? do the BBC have a 30 min slot discussing the Champions League? Why should Sky run a major story on someone they don't broadcast.

Sky sports ran the story on the ticker bar on the bottom of the screen, they also have an article on their website, seems quite suffice.

Maybe ITV should start running adverts for Eastenders :lol:
fluxstuff
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 16:31

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by fluxstuff »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Then don't claim to be a sports news service.
Yes they do. They call it Sky Sports News.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13311
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by MightyWarrior »

fluxstuff wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Then don't claim to be a sports news service.
Yes they do. They call it Sky Sports News.
Yes...we know

They're a bunch of grade A tosspots, reminds me why I cancelled.

So, don't report Calzaghe's retirment, a man they made millions off, because his future fights aren't on Sky? Well they're not on fekking anywhere else either. A sad excuse for a "news channel"
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Hagler2002 »

Errr they did report it on the TV and here http://tinyurl.com/d3xke2

Some people will twist on 21 :roll:
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Lenny »

I'm sure I was watching Sky Sports News when they talked about Calzaghe's retirement for quite a while and asked viewers to let them know if he was one of the greatest of all time, using that trendy pound for pound phase and generally being very nice about him.

What more do you want? For a non football story it got as much coverage on SSN as most other big news.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by Adamj1987 »

the breaking news on ssn lasts all of 10 min usually
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by DavidPayne »

Joe Calzaghe retiring is not as noteworthy as Ken getting hot under the cravat about Stephanie Beacham.

He's a great fighter with an average c.v.

I'll miss him but I still miss Benn, Lewis and Hamed more.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27504
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by stujones »

Well as JC was techincally I guess not a Setanta fighter as of the news - then I guess Sky should have mentioned it.

Sky Sports News coverage of boxing can be odd... they really did mention Holyfield vs Valuev alot - but then Peter vs Klitchsko didn't exist.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by gobbles »

Terence wrote:It was on SSN. It was still running on the ticker throughout the night. What did people expect? A mock funeral and a river of tears? Joe Calzaghe retiring is not as newsworthy as, say, Lewis or Tyson retiring.

Is it more news worthy than the Swansea City manager being made Championship manager of the month, which got a five min segment?

It's meant to be a 24-hour sports news channel, but it has an agenda to push its own sports. BBC ran it in the headlines of the 6 o'clock news, but Sky Sports News, which claims to be a sports news channel, passes over it completely. What a disgrace.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27504
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by stujones »

Plus the fact that it was on the cards - it was hardly a major news story. A bit like Marco Antonio Barrera's 2007 retirement. It was more like a confermation more than anything else.

With Lewis - there was geniune talk of Klitchsko rematch. With Mike Tyson there was no hint of retirment before the McBride fight.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by nobby_nobbins »

I was glad to see that Calzaghe's retirement was one of the top news stories on BBC World Service Radio - not just left for the sport insert.
MR UNTOUCHABLE
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 109
Joined: 31 Aug 2008, 09:23

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again

Post by MR UNTOUCHABLE »

I doubt very much that SKY made millions off of Joe. Doubt it very much indeed!
Post Reply