Dolan all set

chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: Dolan all set

Post by chinny »

Good on Dolan for putting himself in the mix like this so early. I'll watch him again for sure. He doesn't lose anything being involved in fights like this.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 668
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Re: Dolan all set

Post by whatashambles »

Was a 116-109 scorecard possible? Two knockdowns in one round and another knockdown in another round would mean a 10-7 round and a 10-8 round, therefore he would have lost 5 points straight away?
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Dolan all set

Post by black panther »

Bloody Hell how many knockdowns in that fight altogether? Thanks for the rbr fellas - fight sounded a cracker!
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Dolan all set

Post by n1ebf »

whatashambles wrote:Was a 116-109 scorecard possible? Two knockdowns in one round and another knockdown in another round would mean a 10-7 round and a 10-8 round, therefore he would have lost 5 points straight away?
It's all possible.........I only saw my first 5 minute 10 second round last week in the Urango fight. :roll:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Old bones Ian »

Pongsaklek wrote:116-109 to the winner in a fight he gets knocked down in two different rounds and a total of three times is very creative scoring. Dolan won at least four rounds imho. :lol: :lol:
Couple of the KD's were debatable, so maybe the judges didn't score them
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Horse »

Old bones Ian wrote:
Pongsaklek wrote:116-109 to the winner in a fight he gets knocked down in two different rounds and a total of three times is very creative scoring. Dolan won at least four rounds imho. :lol: :lol:
Couple of the KD's were debatable, so maybe the judges didn't score them
How can they not score them?
Andrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 167
Joined: 25 May 2004, 15:31

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Andrey »

I wish, I saw this fight. Hopefully it will be on Yourtube.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Asterix »

Dioufy wrote:
Asterix wrote:Does anyone know anything about Enad Licina?
I have only seen him once, on the Huck Vs Battelo undercard. He looked okay, although he did get put over, but he did recover quite quickly and stopped his man later in the fight with some great shots. I will keep my eye out for him in future fights.
Thanks. I saw the Huck vs Battelo fight but must have missed Licina.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Old bones Ian »

Horse wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
Pongsaklek wrote:116-109 to the winner in a fight he gets knocked down in two different rounds and a total of three times is very creative scoring. Dolan won at least four rounds imho. :lol: :lol:
Couple of the KD's were debatable, so maybe the judges didn't score them
How can they not score them?
Well i don't know the rules exactly, but i thought the judges are lead by the ref, but do not always have to agree, i could be wrong
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Dolan all set

Post by steve689 »

I didn't see the fight but I must confess that given Norton-Steeds I expected this would be a stinker and gave it a wide berth. However, it turned out to be one of the best rbr's we have read here :TU:

Whoever mentioned Enad Licina...seen him 3 or 4 times now and he has nice skills, good basic boxer but seems fragile and I reckon he would fold like an envelope if you "stuck it up him" so to speak! Not convinced he's top level material and Sauerland will match him carefully.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Asterix »

steve689 wrote:I didn't see the fight but I must confess that given Norton-Steeds I expected this would be a stinker and gave it a wide berth. However, it turned out to be one of the best rbr's we have read here :TU:

Whoever mentioned Enad Licina...seen him 3 or 4 times now and he has nice skills, good basic boxer but seems fragile and I reckon he would fold like an envelope if you "stuck it up him" so to speak! Not convinced he's top level material and Sauerland will match him carefully.
It was a good fight. I'm more of a fan of higher level boxing, but it was really good.

Thanks for the info on Licina. He's got a nice rating for someone to take then.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Dioufy »

Sexy fight - I had it 112/111, which is a bizarre score. And didn't that second KD in the 4th come from a head, not a punch?
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Asterix »

Dioufy wrote:Sexy fight - I had it 112/111, which is a bizarre score. And didn't that second KD in the 4th come from a head, not a punch?
It was a punch. The angle from the corner made it look like a head, but another angle showed Norton's chin was hit right on the tip.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Horse »

Dioufy wrote:And didn't that second KD in the 4th come from a head, not a punch?
I thought so.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Dioufy »

I have seen the angles Sky have produced and I'm certain a punch didn't land - if it did then I apoligise.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Hagler2002 »

Dolan was very small in there tonight, I wouldn't be surprised if he could make SM
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Asterix »

Hagler2002 wrote:Dolan was very small in there tonight, I wouldn't be surprised if he could make SM
It's funny, he looked small at Heavyweight but looks just as small at Cruiser. Maybe Light Heavy should be his next target.

In all seriousness though, Dolan looked quite slow tonight and showed very, very little head movement. Big step backwards from Prizefighter, imo. :(
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Hagler2002 »

Asterix wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I was going to have a decent size bet on Dolan @ 5/4 until I seen this thread :(

Norton it is then.
I think Dolan will win.
Mr Bilton could stop a moving train, I'm glad I seen this thread before getting involved :TU:
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Asterix »

Hagler2002 wrote:
Asterix wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I was going to have a decent size bet on Dolan @ 5/4 until I seen this thread :(

Norton it is then.
I think Dolan will win.
Mr Bilton could stop a moving train, I'm glad I seen this thread before getting involved :TU:
Now you see why I don't bet real money. :lol:
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Hagler2002 »

Old bones Ian wrote:Both boxers look up for this, Norton looks in great shape.

I've left work at 9.45, and it was all going a bit pete tong there, had to break up a cat fight, and the local dope dealer was trying to get in the project.
Do you work at the 'Jockey'
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Old bones Ian »

Hagler2002 wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:Both boxers look up for this, Norton looks in great shape.

I've left work at 9.45, and it was all going a bit pete tong there, had to break up a cat fight, and the local dope dealer was trying to get in the project.
Do you work at the 'Jockey'
No mate :lol:
I do a part time job as a youth project worker, i'm no doorman and if you saw me you'd know why, i'm not exactly imtimidating.
But i know when to get involved, and by god those girls can pull hair, :o
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Hagler2002 »

edit
Last edited by Hagler2002 on 07 Feb 2009, 05:00, edited 1 time in total.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Dolan all set

Post by Hagler2002 »

edit
Last edited by Hagler2002 on 07 Feb 2009, 04:59, edited 1 time in total.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5451
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Dolan all set

Post by forcefraser »

Good fight. The second knockown on Norton was a peach. His powers of recovery are immense.

I agree that Norton edged it, but no way was it 116-109, that judge must have been watching a different fight.

Young Mutley looked in decent shape as well
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Dolan all set

Post by whicker »

whatashambles wrote:Was a 116-109 scorecard possible? Two knockdowns in one round and another knockdown in another round would mean a 10-7 round and a 10-8 round, therefore he would have lost 5 points straight away?


10-7 is only given when a fighter clearly totally dominates the oppoent and puts him down several times, eg Enzo Maccarinellis first round V Matthew Ellis.

A judge does not actually HAVE to give 10-8 or 10-7, if for example he feels that fighter knocked down slipped, or simply they were incidental/flash knockdowns etc.

If the guy knocked down clearly wins the round, then I think it is scored 10-9 (against him) , but I'm not 100% sure of this.

So a score of 116 could suggest that the ref felt he lost those rounds as 10-8s, but either won or drew every other one, or that he actually won a round in which he was knocked down.
Post Reply