Froch-Taylor still not signed
-
nobby_nobbins
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 654
- Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07
Froch-Taylor still not signed
There must be a serious problem with this. We were told it would be done in 48 hours about a week ago and have heard nothing since.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Actually I heard in an interview with the bbc that they were sorting out a venue and date out before announcing.
-
nobby_nobbins
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 654
- Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Thanks James - that's good to hearjameswilson wrote:Actually I heard in an interview with the bbc that they were sorting out a venue and date out before announcing.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Believe it when I see it.
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3342
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
I read that Meaty Mick is trying to pimp it out to Sky box office or Setanta - Not sure if that is a hold up, but it could be.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Box office would be tricky because of Khan in March and Hatton on May 2. That would be 3 in 7 weeks. Can't see them doing another pay-per-view right in front of Hatton.Twinkle Toes wrote:I read that Meaty Mick is trying to pimp it out to Sky box office or Setanta - Not sure if that is a hold up, but it could be.
-
nobby_nobbins
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 654
- Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
I shouldn't really be optimistic. If there's no venue and no date then there's no fight.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
The only thing that sounds right about this is that ShoBox do have it listed for late April on their schedule.
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Heard that too - ITV are certainly not going to offer the money that is required - I am willing to bet that Sky and Setanta will play "hard ball" too!!!Twinkle Toes wrote:I read that Meaty Mick is trying to pimp it out to Sky box office or Setanta - Not sure if that is a hold up, but it could be.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
x3Spud wrote:Heard that tooTwinkle Toes wrote:I read that Meaty Mick is trying to pimp it out to Sky box office or Setanta
Setanta would make sense given their good relationship with ITV (sharing the same building, commentators, etc).
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
It will be at Setanta's price rather than "Meaty Micks"!!!Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:x3Spud wrote:Heard that tooTwinkle Toes wrote:I read that Meaty Mick is trying to pimp it out to Sky box office or Setanta
Setanta would make sense given their good relationship with ITV (sharing the same building, commentators, etc).
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:x3Spud wrote:Heard that tooTwinkle Toes wrote:I read that Meaty Mick is trying to pimp it out to Sky box office or Setanta
Setanta would make sense given their good relationship with ITV (sharing the same building, commentators, etc).
Rawling has been stopped from doing Setanta fights
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Last weekend's Nate Campbell, Sergio Martinez, etc card didn't have a location till about a month before the fights.nobby_nobbins wrote:I shouldn't really be optimistic. If there's no venue and no date then there's no fight.
-
nobby_nobbins
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 654
- Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Thanks for that Autobarn - that's encouraging.Autobarn wrote:Last weekend's Nate Campbell, Sergio Martinez, etc card didn't have a location till about a month before the fights.nobby_nobbins wrote:I shouldn't really be optimistic. If there's no venue and no date then there's no fight.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
No good to me. If I'm going to make the trip out I need more notice to work on the missus. Hope its MSG and hope its confirmed soon.Autobarn wrote:Last weekend's Nate Campbell, Sergio Martinez, etc card didn't have a location till about a month before the fights.nobby_nobbins wrote:I shouldn't really be optimistic. If there's no venue and no date then there's no fight.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Hope Sky don't buy it - I will buy the Hatton/Pacquiao card, but Khan/Barrera and, potentially Froch/Taylor can feck right off. I think Sky think that I shit money - I can't pay £40 a month and then pay £15 for all the good fights. fornicating joke.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Froch isn't high profile enough to get on PPV it'd be a disaster IMODioufy wrote:Hope Sky don't buy it - I will buy the Hatton/Pacquiao card, but Khan/Barrera and, potentially Froch/Taylor can feck right off. I think Sky think that I shit money - I can't pay £40 a month and then pay £15 for all the good fights. effing joke.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Because both camps are determine not to fight in their opponent's backyard. This fight will end up in a city/venue where nobody will give a crap about that fight and where ticket sells will be pathetic at best.
Can't believe long time promoters like Dibella and Henessey are this dumb.
Can't believe long time promoters like Dibella and Henessey are this dumb.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
How is Carl determined not to fight in his opponents backyard?Maxime wrote:Because both camps are determine not to fight in their opponent's backyard. This fight will end up in a city/venue where nobody will give a crap about that fight and where ticket sells will be pathetic at best.
Can't believe long time promoters like Dibella and Henessey are this dumb.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
As far as I know Froch team didn't want to fight in Arkansas or any of the neighbor's states like Tennessee where Taylor has fought many times. That's called not wanting to fight in an opponent's backyard in my book.Chambers2 wrote:How is Carl determined not to fight in his opponents backyard?Maxime wrote:Because both camps are determine not to fight in their opponent's backyard. This fight will end up in a city/venue where nobody will give a crap about that fight and where ticket sells will be pathetic at best.
Can't believe long time promoters like Dibella and Henessey are this dumb.
Instead the fight will take place in NY or Florida. Thousands of miles away from Froch's and Taylor's fans.
This kind of shit makes no sense. The fight should happen where it would generate interest. Either in Froch's or Taylor's hometown. All you need is neutral judges and ref from out of the country.
This is not an high profile fight that will generate interest everywhere in the USA. Nobody gives a shit about that fight other then Froch's and Taylor's fans.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
you think bute would fight taylor near arkansas? pound out an 8-4 type win and then lose 7-5, 6-5-1, 10-2 on the cards?Maxime wrote:As far as I know Froch team didn't want to fight in Arkansas or any of the neighbor's states like Tennessee where Taylor has fought many times. That's called not wanting to fight in an opponent's backyard in my book.Chambers2 wrote:How is Carl determined not to fight in his opponents backyard?Maxime wrote:Because both camps are determine not to fight in their opponent's backyard. This fight will end up in a city/venue where nobody will give a crap about that fight and where ticket sells will be pathetic at best.
Can't believe long time promoters like Dibella and Henessey are this dumb.
Instead the fight will take place in NY or Florida. Thousands of miles away from Froch's and Taylor's fans.
This kind of shit makes no sense. The fight should happen where it would generate interest. Either in Froch's or Taylor's hometown. All you need is neutral judges and ref from out of the country.
This is not an high profile fight that will generate interest everywhere in the USA. Nobody gives a shit about that fight other then Froch's and Taylor's fans.
Let's say if Froch outworked Taylor and lost a bad decision. Sure ppl would say hey, that froch is pretty good. However he would be without a title and without the next payday, struggling to find future opponents, etc. And his promoter would get absolutely slated from everyone.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
It's up to the promoter to get neutral judges and a neutral ref. Doesn't matter where the fight take place.Autobarn wrote: you think bute would fight taylor near arkansas? pound out an 8-4 type win and then lose 7-5, 6-5-1, 10-2 on the cards?
Let's say if Froch outworked Taylor and lost a bad decision. Sure ppl would say hey, that froch is pretty good. However he would be without a title and without the next payday, struggling to find future opponents, etc. And his promoter would get absolutely slated from everyone.
I will always believe it's better to make the fight where the fight matters.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
You may be right, but have you got a source for this info. I've not seen oneMaxime wrote: As far as I know Froch team didn't want to fight in Arkansas or any of the neighbor's states like Tennessee where Taylor has fought many times.
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
Florida or MSG with Barker v Duddy, Fury and Guinn all on the undercard.Chambers2 wrote:You may be right, but have you got a source for this info. I've not seen oneMaxime wrote: As far as I know Froch team didn't want to fight in Arkansas or any of the neighbor's states like Tennessee where Taylor has fought many times.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Froch-Taylor still not signed
He acts as if he is in the know but in truth he knows sod all more than what we do.Chambers2 wrote:You may be right, but have you got a source for this info. I've not seen oneMaxime wrote: As far as I know Froch team didn't want to fight in Arkansas or any of the neighbor's states like Tennessee where Taylor has fought many times.