SUGAR
-
richter-scale
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 279
- Joined: 27 Feb 2004, 15:06
SUGAR
Any one else think (Sugar) ed robinson and paul dempsy help make "ringside" the show it is
BLOODY GREAT VIEWING FOR A THURSDAY NIGHT. Have to say i think colin hart talks a load of B*****KS tho? Mr Nelson doing a good job too 
Re: SUGAR
Ringside is a great show. A nice mix of chat and action.richter-scale wrote:Any one else think (Sugar) ed robinson and paul dempsy help make "ringside" the show it isBLOODY GREAT VIEWING FOR A THURSDAY NIGHT. Have to say i think colin hart talks a load of B*****KS tho? Mr Nelson doing a good job too
Colin Hart's a bitter old man nowadays and I don't know why they use him.
-
richter-scale
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 279
- Joined: 27 Feb 2004, 15:06
Re: SUGAR
GOOD CALL BEN, Think ed will ever make a comeback? HA HA BLOODY HOPE NOTbennie wrote:Ringside is a great show. A nice mix of chat and action.richter-scale wrote:Any one else think (Sugar) ed robinson and paul dempsy help make "ringside" the show it isBLOODY GREAT VIEWING FOR A THURSDAY NIGHT. Have to say i think colin hart talks a load of B*****KS tho? Mr Nelson doing a good job too
Colin Hart's a bitter old man nowadays and I don't know why they use him.
Paul Dempsey is a good anchor, if a bit repititve - its funny when you watch the old tapes - the guy still uses EXACTLY the same phrases to close up ("By for now") and introduce and hasn't aged at all. Its only when they go to McGuigan when you can tell how old the recording is.
Ringside is a good show, my one failing with it was that it doesn't often show the fights in full (I had the video set up for Dean Phillips and they cut most of it out).
Incidently, is "Ed r" who occasionally posts here Ed Robinson?
Ringside is a good show, my one failing with it was that it doesn't often show the fights in full (I had the video set up for Dean Phillips and they cut most of it out).
Incidently, is "Ed r" who occasionally posts here Ed Robinson?
-
glittermonkey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2658
- Joined: 28 Feb 2004, 18:03
My one complaint (it's more of a gripe with sky really) is that when we have live boxing during the week, there's no ringside. In an ideal world i'd like ringside to be shifted to another night, so that we can get both. Or is that just me being greedy?
For me the show's at its best when Nelson, McGuigan and Watt are the panellists. All three know what they're talking about, and aren't afraid to call it as they see it. Having said that, i do like the idea of rotating the guests, so that we do get a broader range of opinions.
You can see why they cut the rounds most of the time, there's just alot to fit into a one hour timeslot, it's really a shame that sky can't extend the length of the program on a regular basis. I mean, come on, what else do they have to show on a thursday night?
I think Ed Robinson posts as "Ed r" and "Ed Rob". Judging from their posts i'm pretty sure they're the same guy.
For me the show's at its best when Nelson, McGuigan and Watt are the panellists. All three know what they're talking about, and aren't afraid to call it as they see it. Having said that, i do like the idea of rotating the guests, so that we do get a broader range of opinions.
You can see why they cut the rounds most of the time, there's just alot to fit into a one hour timeslot, it's really a shame that sky can't extend the length of the program on a regular basis. I mean, come on, what else do they have to show on a thursday night?
I think Ed Robinson posts as "Ed r" and "Ed Rob". Judging from their posts i'm pretty sure they're the same guy.
-
The Devil In Roy Jones
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 166
- Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:13
-
DIRT SUGAR
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1200
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 11:48
Re Colin Hart. The two or three times I've been ringside and after a fight when everyone's standing up and making their way to press conference or whatever, some of the comments he's made to me have been spot on, but he always comes across as pompous. And anyway, just because he's been around during the primes of some great fighters doesn't automatically make him a great writer does it?
I mean, Hart v McIllvanney. There's no contest is there?
I mean, Hart v McIllvanney. There's no contest is there?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
they are the only ones who do, out of the rest the only one who you can credit is Adam Smith, and he's an Alan Partridge clone, which says it all. Dempsey is awful, won't criticise anybody, his excuse making for Warren the other week made me want to vomit "Surely you can't criticise allegedly though Barry"glittermonkey wrote:For me the show's at its best when Nelson, McGuigan and Watt are the panellists. All three know what they're talking about, and aren't afraid to call it as they see it.
Oh, and they should get rid of Nicky Piper, he's simply a twat and extremely biased.