How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Quixall »

BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:One of the problems with todays heavies is they are just not exciting enough, and maybe its because the East Europeon boxers are to safety first in there boxing.

The leading heavyweight Wladimir Klitschko has a 52-3 record with 46 KO's!!!! and been stopped in all his losses, but how many exciting fights has he been in?? A handful , if that.
Same with his brother Vitali Klitschko who has only been the distance once in 36 wins, with records like that they should be exciting the crowds, but they just don't.
- Saw an interview with Chuvalo the other day decrying the lack of excitement.

Every heavyweight division that ever existed fell short of previous storied eras. That's the nature of bandwagon fans and media who also have their own primes and are challenged by newer generations of fighters.

Some give props to the Klitschkos, but downgrade their defenses. How long would it take Peter, Brock, Sanders, even a past it Rahman to dispose of the gutted Cleve Williams Ali is touted for, or Brian London, or even broke back Patterson who could barely mount a retreat? You don't think Chris Byrd couldn't pick apart Hurricane Jackson, Tom McNeeley, Richard Dunn, Evangelista, Coopman, Leon, Wepner, Scott Frank, Zanon, Marvis, Rodriguez, Ocasio, Bey, and so on?

It's a racial thing this excitement charge. Eastern Euros are incredibly stoic in their culture, and interviewing in a foreign language, they are well aware the English speaking peoples caricatures of Russians, so they speak carefully in a foreign tongue and carry themselves with respect. Ali's act got terribly stale and punch drunk in his comeback, and of course Bowe, Toney, and Tyson hit all time lows. I prefer intelligent gentlemen and sportsmen, not gibbering ME, ME, it's all about ME and my loud mouth and bad manners.

Lewis was criticized in the same fashion as the brothers. Ruddock a club fighter, Tommy the great white dope, beat by lazy Mercer, Grant a glass chin bum, afraid to get out behind the jab against Tua, sparked by clubfighters, no personality, too gentlemanly. He retires, and suddenly he's a top ten all time fighter.

Plop the brothers in any era, and some HOF champs to be knocked off. Ol' Skin & Bones Fitz a storied fighter, but these brothers are the latest in the ongoing trend to superheavies. Patterson the last 190lb champ with every champ since well over 200. Byrd the exception in the era because of skills and reflexes, but man o man did he struggle.
Brian London and Richard Dunn should never have shared a ring with Ali....

It seems that before the 1970's super fights, people, ingeneral, talked about individual fighters rather than "era's". People spoke of Johnson, Tunney, Dempsey, Louis, Marciano, Liston, Patterson amd then when it got to the 1970's, it became about a scene or an era in boxing. All of sudden, in the early 1970's, you had widespread international support through incraesed telivision audiences, bigger pay purses and the glamour of that period was refelcted by the explotion of American culture around the world. The key ingerdient that brought it all together was the high calibre fighters, each with individulal personalities andf fighting styles, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Norton and Shavers......

An "era" was set and the heavyweight scene has been trying to compete with that ever since and as time goes by, that period gets better in the minds of fight fans, who perhaps have'nt seen all the fights in full, simply because it's seen as "the glory years". I agree with what you say about the fighters Ali fought, outside of the "elite" fighters and it;s true that someone like a Wladimir Klitschko or even a Frank Bruno for that matter, would have beaten the likes of Dunn, Cooper, Londona and other international fighters like Chuck Wepner and Cleveland Williams.....

To some degree, it is perception and looking at things throug rose tinted glasees, however, i would still say that this generation of heavyweights is weak in comparison to previous era's, especially the 1970's
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Quixall »

ArtOfWar wrote:Size overtaking skill is the biggest problem. Even if a fighter is not the best in the world he can still be fun to watch if he's able to put his shots together. The Klitschkos rarely through combinations, and they are the two best guy's in the division. What does that tell you? Valuev is even worse, he simply can't throw combinations. Then behind that you've got a mixture of unproven fighters and guy's who simply aren't very good. There is no depth at all.

Chris Arreola is being hyped up by the Americans, they wouldn't have given two s**ts about him in the nineties. The man is still trying to prove himself to the boxing public and he can't even get in decent shape. What's he gonna be like if he wins a belt and makes a couple of million dollars. That's why so many people are excited by Haye and Povetkin. Both smaller guy's who have things to prove, but at least they can put combinations together and get the crowd going.
If you watch Wlad's recent fight, he only uses two distinct type of punches all night...

Can you remember the fight that Tyson had with Pinklon Thomas ? Right at the end of the fight, Tyson delivers a slavo of punches, all accurate, all with great speed and power and takes Thomas out....

I can't see Wlad doing that to any opponent and cerainly not in that style

I don't rate Arreola at all, he's an embarressment and i think he will get beaten soon anyway
ApolloCreed
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by ApolloCreed »

The recession (depression?) worldwide, particulalry in America, could yet be good for boxing as hungry young lads turn to the noble art to get out of the ghetto...

Fairytale or fact?!
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Quixall »

ApolloCreed wrote:The recession (depression?) worldwide, particulalry in America, could yet be good for boxing as hungry young lads turn to the noble art to get out of the ghetto...

Fairytale or fact?!
I think that in previous era's, it was perhaps a fact, but in the modern era, there are perhaps more ways to get yourself out of the ghetto, than turn to professional boxing....

I think it's telling that in recent years, more fighters are coming out of parts of eastern Europe, that was formerly under the control of the soviets and less are coming out of America. You can certainly see that trend over the last ten years or so.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by ArtOfWar »

Quixall wrote:
ArtOfWar wrote:Size overtaking skill is the biggest problem. Even if a fighter is not the best in the world he can still be fun to watch if he's able to put his shots together. The Klitschkos rarely through combinations, and they are the two best guy's in the division. What does that tell you? Valuev is even worse, he simply can't throw combinations. Then behind that you've got a mixture of unproven fighters and guy's who simply aren't very good. There is no depth at all.

Chris Arreola is being hyped up by the Americans, they wouldn't have given two s**ts about him in the nineties. The man is still trying to prove himself to the boxing public and he can't even get in decent shape. What's he gonna be like if he wins a belt and makes a couple of million dollars. That's why so many people are excited by Haye and Povetkin. Both smaller guy's who have things to prove, but at least they can put combinations together and get the crowd going.
If you watch Wlad's recent fight, he only uses two distinct type of punches all night...

Can you remember the fight that Tyson had with Pinklon Thomas ? Right at the end of the fight, Tyson delivers a slavo of punches, all accurate, all with great speed and power and takes Thomas out....

I can't see Wlad doing that to any opponent and cerainly not in that style

I don't rate Arreola at all, he's an embarressment and i think he will get beaten soon anyway
Yep, tremendous finish. But even guy's like Bert Cooper, Mike Weaver, Michael Dokes etc knew how to let their hands go. They weren't great fighters, but they were certainly more entertaining than most of today's heavyweights.
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Quixall »

ArtOfWar wrote:
Quixall wrote:
ArtOfWar wrote:Size overtaking skill is the biggest problem. Even if a fighter is not the best in the world he can still be fun to watch if he's able to put his shots together. The Klitschkos rarely through combinations, and they are the two best guy's in the division. What does that tell you? Valuev is even worse, he simply can't throw combinations. Then behind that you've got a mixture of unproven fighters and guy's who simply aren't very good. There is no depth at all.

Chris Arreola is being hyped up by the Americans, they wouldn't have given two s**ts about him in the nineties. The man is still trying to prove himself to the boxing public and he can't even get in decent shape. What's he gonna be like if he wins a belt and makes a couple of million dollars. That's why so many people are excited by Haye and Povetkin. Both smaller guy's who have things to prove, but at least they can put combinations together and get the crowd going.
If you watch Wlad's recent fight, he only uses two distinct type of punches all night...

Can you remember the fight that Tyson had with Pinklon Thomas ? Right at the end of the fight, Tyson delivers a slavo of punches, all accurate, all with great speed and power and takes Thomas out....

I can't see Wlad doing that to any opponent and cerainly not in that style

I don't rate Arreola at all, he's an embarressment and i think he will get beaten soon anyway
Yep, tremendous finish. But even guy's like Bert Cooper, Mike Weaver, Michael Dokes etc knew how to let their hands go. They weren't great fighters, but they were certainly more entertaining than most of today's heavyweights.
True
Colesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 74
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 20:30

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Colesy »

Q. How good is the current heavyweight division

A. Shite
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Quixall »

Colesy wrote:Q. How good is the current heavyweight division

A. Shite
To the point......i like that :D

and i would have to agree
hitman09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1838
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 10:39

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by hitman09 »

banjo wrote:Horrible state it is, Vitali got cut to ribbons by an old, inactive and out of shape Lennox Lewis but he's probably the best heavyweight out there today.
He got cut, but do you forget he was leading on all 3 cards at the time? Not his fault he lost.
clubberlang
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 04:47

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by clubberlang »

The division is in a horrible state.

When I think of the major names in the division here’s what comes to mind.

Wlad – Glass jaw, poor stamina & reluctant.
Vitali – Injury prone
Chagaev – Injury prone
Valuev – ponderous and horrendously limited
Peter – ponderous and horrendously limited
Ruiz – One of the most boring fighters in the world and a prick to boot.
Toney – Fat & past it
Gomez – clever but to small
Thompson – yawn.
Dimitrenko – absolutely nothing to get excited about.



Lets just hope that David Hayes chin and lack of size doesn’t let him down, as he’s by far the most talented and exciting thing in the division.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Matt W »

As previously stated, sh1te.

Far too many are either limited, fat or both.

And one of them has a grossly hairy back and shoulders.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26341
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by banjo »

hitman09 wrote:
banjo wrote:Horrible state it is, Vitali got cut to ribbons by an old, inactive and out of shape Lennox Lewis but he's probably the best heavyweight out there today.
He got cut, but do you forget he was leading on all 3 cards at the time? Not his fault he lost.
Do you forget Lennox was way past his best?

Yes he was leading on all 3 cards and I had him winning at that point as well but it's not as if it's a controversial stoppage, the cut was caused by a punch.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote: - Saw an interview with Chuvalo the other day decrying the lack of excitement.

Every heavyweight division that ever existed fell short of previous storied eras. That's the nature of bandwagon fans and media who also have their own primes and are challenged by newer generations of fighters.

Some give props to the Klitschkos, but downgrade their defenses. How long would it take Peter, Brock, Sanders, even a past it Rahman to dispose of the gutted Cleve Williams Ali is touted for, or Brian London, or even broke back Patterson who could barely mount a retreat? You don't think Chris Byrd couldn't pick apart Hurricane Jackson, Tom McNeeley, Richard Dunn, Evangelista, Coopman, Leon, Wepner, Scott Frank, Zanon, Marvis, Rodriguez, Ocasio, Bey, and so on?

It's a racial thing this excitement charge. Eastern Euros are incredibly stoic in their culture, and interviewing in a foreign language, they are well aware the English speaking peoples caricatures of Russians, so they speak carefully in a foreign tongue and carry themselves with respect. Ali's act got terribly stale and punch drunk in his comeback, and of course Bowe, Toney, and Tyson hit all time lows. I prefer intelligent gentlemen and sportsmen, not gibbering ME, ME, it's all about ME and my loud mouth and bad manners.

Lewis was criticized in the same fashion as the brothers. Ruddock a club fighter, Tommy the great white dope, beat by lazy Mercer, Grant a glass chin bum, afraid to get out behind the jab against Tua, sparked by clubfighters, no personality, too gentlemanly. He retires, and suddenly he's a top ten all time fighter.

Plop the brothers in any era, and some HOF champs to be knocked off. Ol' Skin & Bones Fitz a storied fighter, but these brothers are the latest in the ongoing trend to superheavies. Patterson the last 190lb champ with every champ since well over 200. Byrd the exception in the era because of skills and reflexes, but man o man did he struggle.
Interesting points but today's fighters have steroids (which most HWs take today), better supplements, better nutrition and better training methods (in addition to). Yet most still can't get into fighting shape.

Its all become about size and bodybuilding now and actually boxing skills are very very poor. Vitali himself has shocking punching and defensive technique and if tested against the best he'd come up short. Wlad has far better technique, excellent in fact but can be a chinny bottler. Haye for all the talk has a piss poor technical defense, punches wide at times and is no technican. In the 90s he'd be no threat whatsoever. Chageav (or whatever hes called) is fat, unathletic and average. Valuev while huge is very very basic and slow and seems to be suffering from the bad health very tall men suffer from (poor circulation) and should have lost to a shot to pieces Holyfield and Ruiz

As for Cleveland Williams he may well beat most around today, he was a monster puncher, put punches together well and actually bothered to get into fighting shape, imagine him with 20lbs extra muscle from all the advances he'd be a beast.

Lastly bare in mind arguably the best MW of the last 5years is a fat 5'9 middleweight 15 years past his prime and not bothering to do any real training
champ4ever
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 70
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 11:16

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by champ4ever »

the current heavyweight division is very competitive, in a way that not one fighter is good enough to dominate the division, not the way louis dominated, not the way a young ali, and holmes dominated their divisions, but overall the division is very weak in talent.

the 90's heavyweight would shit all over the current heavyweights.
hitman09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1838
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 10:39

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by hitman09 »

banjo wrote:
hitman09 wrote:
banjo wrote:Horrible state it is, Vitali got cut to ribbons by an old, inactive and out of shape Lennox Lewis but he's probably the best heavyweight out there today.
He got cut, but do you forget he was leading on all 3 cards at the time? Not his fault he lost.
Do you forget Lennox was way past his best?

Yes he was leading on all 3 cards and I had him winning at that point as well but it's not as if it's a controversial stoppage, the cut was caused by a punch.
I'm aware what caused the cut, but your skin splitting under the impact of punches is not a deficiency in talent or ability, it is simply bad luck.
champ4ever
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 70
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 11:16

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by champ4ever »

I'm aware what caused the cut, but your skin splitting under the impact of punches is not a deficiency in talent or ability, it is simply bad luck
it was bad luck, but you gotta remember vitali had the best chance of beating lennox than anyone before him, and he blew it. lennox has never been that out of shape, he obviously has never been that old, and he was ring rusty aswell, put that altogether, and it spells disaster, and lennox got away with it, and IMO he was looking like the stronger fighter when the fight got stopped. vitali at times was hanging on for dear life, mind you he did take the uppercuts well.

what you should remember is when lennox came in that sort of condition, he got knocked out, and vitali could'nt do that, and that is his fault. he had the best chance of knocking lennox than anyone before him, and he could'nt do it.
champ4ever
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 70
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 11:16

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by champ4ever »

Terence wrote:
champ4ever wrote:
I'm aware what caused the cut, but your skin splitting under the impact of punches is not a deficiency in talent or ability, it is simply bad luck
it was bad luck, but you gotta remember vitali had the best chance of beating lennox than anyone before him, and he blew it. lennox has never been that out of shape, he obviously has never been that old, and he was ring rusty aswell, put that altogether, and it spells disaster, and lennox got away with it, and IMO he was looking like the stronger fighter when the fight got stopped. vitali at times was hanging on for dear life, mind you he did take the uppercuts well.

what you should remember is when lennox came in that sort of condition, he got knocked out, and vitali could'nt do that, and that is his fault. he had the best chance of knocking lennox than anyone before him, and he could'nt do it.
Has everyone lost their commonsense today? Are you all on drugs, serve me up :TU:

Throwing a shot, at someone's face, then hitting someone, in the face, is suddenly luck? I suppose darts is just a bunch of pissheads chucking spears at an object and hoping for the best?

Lewis trained for years on his technique, then used that technique to land a shot that cut his opponent, then targeted that cut until the fight was stopped.

That is not luck.

No offence, and hate to sound pedantic, but that type of 'bad luck' claim is the type of thinking that allowed Merchant and HBO to somehow convince people that Lewis had won the fight unfairly, when he had in fact TKO'd the guy. With little prep, with his youth gone and with the fight, initially, going against him.
it's bad luck in a sense that lennox did'nt delibratly cut vitali up, he did'nt think "here we go, if i land that punch, then he's going to be cut".. he threw the punch, a right hand that cut vitali, and that's where the bad luck comes into play for vitali. if he fought lennox again nine times out ten he probably would'bt be cut up as bad as he was in that fight.

your darts excuse is pathetic because they aim for the highest score, so that's not luck, it'll be luck if they threw that dart not realising what number they was aiming for and then got the high score, which you could say for lennox, he aimed for the right hand to land, but he got the jackpot when the punch he landed caused a big cut.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Matt W »

Suggesting the cut was down to luck is like saying landing a punch on the chin and knocking somebody out is luck. Both are the potential consequences of landing a good shot. Lewis landed a great shot on Vitali. Nothing lucky about it IMO, in the same way that Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman sparking Lennox were not lucky. As someone once said, 'Luck is where preparedness meets opportunity'.
champ4ever
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 70
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 11:16

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by champ4ever »

Matt W wrote:Suggesting the cut was down to luck is like saying landing a punch on the chin and knocking somebody out is luck. Both are the potential consequences of landing a good shot. Lewis landed a great shot on Vitali. Nothing lucky about it IMO, in the same way that Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman sparking Lennox were not lucky. As someone once said, 'Luck is where preparedness meets opportunity'.
not really, throwing a punch you're aiming to knock somebody out, that's your aim, but it was'nt lennox's aim to cut vitali with that punch. anything you do that's not planned is luck even though the possibility of it happening is possible.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Matt W »

Do boxers aim to KO somebody with every punch? Many fighters would argue that it is when you are trying to KO somebody that you are least likely to. I would suggest that you are trying to either score points (particularly a lesser puncher) and / or cause damage, which may be in the form of cuts or dazing an opponent or scoring a knockdown.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Matt W »

champ4ever wrote:
Matt W wrote:Suggesting the cut was down to luck is like saying landing a punch on the chin and knocking somebody out is luck. Both are the potential consequences of landing a good shot. Lewis landed a great shot on Vitali. Nothing lucky about it IMO, in the same way that Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman sparking Lennox were not lucky. As someone once said, 'Luck is where preparedness meets opportunity'.
not really, throwing a punch you're aiming to knock somebody out, that's your aim, but it was'nt lennox's aim to cut vitali with that punch. anything you do that's not planned is luck even though the possibility of it happening is possible.
By that definition just about everything you do is luck, and every punch that didn't KO your opponent would be bad luck.
champ4ever
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 70
Joined: 18 Jul 2004, 11:16

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by champ4ever »

Matt W wrote:Do boxers aim to KO somebody with every punch? Many fighters would argue that it is when you are trying to KO somebody that you are least likely to. I would suggest that you are trying to either score points (particularly a lesser puncher) and / or cause damage, which may be in the form of cuts or dazing an opponent or scoring a knockdown.
not score a knockout with every punch, but your aim of landing a punch is to hurt your opponent, and i'm sure lennox's punch was'nt meant to cut his opponent, that was like a bonus.

anyway, i think personally lennox would of won anyway as he was the stronger fighter later on landing the better punches. people bring up the scorecards, but it was only the sixth round, still has a whole second half of the fight to go, and lennox IMO was heading for a stoppage win. that's my opinion
Quixall
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Quixall »

champ4ever wrote:
Matt W wrote:Do boxers aim to KO somebody with every punch? Many fighters would argue that it is when you are trying to KO somebody that you are least likely to. I would suggest that you are trying to either score points (particularly a lesser puncher) and / or cause damage, which may be in the form of cuts or dazing an opponent or scoring a knockdown.
not score a knockout with every punch, but your aim of landing a punch is to hurt your opponent, and i'm sure lennox's punch was'nt meant to cut his opponent, that was like a bonus.

anyway, i think personally lennox would of won anyway as he was the stronger fighter later on landing the better punches. people bring up the scorecards, but it was only the sixth round, still has a whole second half of the fight to go, and lennox IMO was heading for a stoppage win. that's my opinion
I see you've got yourself into a good scrap here Champ :D

Who's winning :box:
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by tobyh5 »

I have said this before and am now saying it again.

In boxing the object of the exercise is to either win more rounds than your opponent in order to accumilate more points than the other guy OR prevent him from reaching the final bell.

It does not matter how you do it as long as it is within the rules. Cut, clean KO, make him quit, make his corner retire him, force the referee to halt the fight. Just stop him getting to the end.

A win is a win and last time I checked, Lennox inflicted injuries on Klit that prevented him getting to the final bell which is a victory. So what if klit was winning, if Lennox was tired, Klit was tired, the referee had damn sunstroke. It was a 12 round fight and Lennox either had to win more rounds or stop Klit getting to the end. He did exactly that. No further discussion required. I do not care if Lennox was hanging out his arse, I do not care if people think Klit was coming on to win, he was cut, he was a punch that caused it, he could not continue, get over it.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: How good is the current Heavyweight division ?

Post by Asterix »

Are we on Lewis vs Klitschko in here too? Even without the stoppage, Lewis was going to win. The tide was in his favour and he was only going to mess up Vitali's face even more.
Post Reply