I know, I just said thathhaehre wrote:Sykes was an accomplished amatuer and a solid pro, Lenny was a barroom brawler. Sykes would have beaten Lenny like a drum.HomicideHenry wrote:I think had Lenny fought Sykes in the 1980's, it would have proved disasterous for the Guvnor. Lenny, imo, may have been the face of unlicensed boxing in Britain, but, had he fought Roy Shaw in his prime, he wouldnt have come out the winner in the series they had. Sykes, I would have loved to have seen face Johnny Waldron, Cliff Fields and John Fury though.mercman wrote:In addition to his pro career, Paul Sykes represented England as an amateur boxer. He also had countless streetfights, bar-room brawls and tear-ups. He was scheduled to fight Lenny Maclean in an unlicensed fight some time in the early 1980s but this never happened. Sykes got locked up before it could go ahead. The man was a complete loose canon and an exploitative bully though. Don't have any illusions, Sykes could be witty but he was a nasty peice of work. He was a lethal cocktail - an unbalanced, unstable heavyweight boxer, powerlifter and heavy drinker. A bit like a 6'3'' 220lb version of Begbie from the film Trainspotting. One to avoid. And definitely not one to share a prison cell with.
Considering Fields, Waldron, Paddock and Shaw all had legit careers in the ring as well as dabbling in unlicensed matches, I think someone who was tough enough, strong enough and had the basics down, probably would have beaten McLean rather easily. But as far as street fights go, McLean swore up and down he never lost "on the cobbles". I dont think theres that many out there to dispute this.



