Without a doubt, Muhammad Ali has had the greatest influence in the understanding,
and appreciation of our great sport over the last fifty or so years. But when it comes to discussing
Ali, the boxer, emotional intelligence is often left in the cookie jar, and raw emotion often
clouds the real effective and objective analysis of Muhammad Ali.
My personal experience with Muhammad Ali is limited to one meeting with him in 1972, when two of us were invited by Ali to talk about boxing while Ali was staying at the Georgia Hotel in Vancouver. I thank ex-boxer Manuel (Manny) Gonzalez an the old time boxing trainer
Billy DeFoe of Houston, Texas for being the instruments that enabled two of us amateur boxers
from Nanaimo, BC to be invited into Ali's world. Without a doubt, this was one great moment.
The raw emotion concerning Muhammad Ali was often present in great big scoops in
the "Sound Off" columns of "World Boxing" and "International Boxing" in the Seventies.
It seems so long ago, but the hottest emotional views expressed by boxing fans were
the great debates over Muhammad Ali and Jerry Quarry. But pleased to say, others such
as Jose Napoles, Emile Griffith, Eder Jofre, and Vincente Saldivar got a piece of the
"Sound Off" action.
Heated emotion aside, there is a need to sort out the facts, fantasy and fiction
when it is time to discuss ALI the boxer, we must be prepared to remove the
rose tinted glasses or the dark eye shades when trying to judge Ali as the best of the best.
Without a doubt, Ali is one of the all time greats, but the best heavyweight of all time
is subject to the reality of facts. ALI is a great boxer, not some Hollywood action fantasy figure. :idea:
Of all the boxers that fought in their prime in the Sixties, Emile Griffith is often considered the best. But, for pure skill and performance boxer Eder Jofre is hard to beat. :?? :idea: