is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
i know this is a strange question on a boxing forum. Normally I would be one who would be campaining for as much boxing on tv that is possible. i never thought i would be saying this. but we had 13 hours of boxing last saturday. we have another triple header on saturday week. Last Saturday night really messed up my sleep patterns for the next few days. i dont think i would be able for 3 major weekends in a row. i know we have a good friday fight night and we have herbie hide on eurosport on friday. i am kind of glad we have no live boxing from the us on tv on saturday night. there is 2 hours of boxing on itv4 on saturday night. one hour is the big fight review with a tribute to reg gutteridge and then there is big fights greatest knockouts from 8.15 until 9.15.
between the boxing on friday night and itv on saturday night that will keep me going for this weekend i reckon and im kind of glad there is no live late night boxing this weekend baring in mind next weekend is going to be overloaded again.
between the boxing on friday night and itv on saturday night that will keep me going for this weekend i reckon and im kind of glad there is no live late night boxing this weekend baring in mind next weekend is going to be overloaded again.
-
Chris W 1982
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1139
- Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Get a grip mate. How can you be a fan and moan that there's no coverage this weekend.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
i just think there is enough coverage this weekend between friday night and the itv stuff saturday night. having said all that i would not be complaining if the kirkland bill was on tv saturday night. i might be on my own here but i am kind of relieved i wont up up until the early hours on sunday morning. maybe 13 hours was just a little too much last weekend and i am glad it wont be as action packed this weekend considering next weekend is another triple header. i would propably be saying none of this if there was not a triple header next weekend.The quiet man 2004 wrote:Get a grip mate. How can you be a fan and moan that there's no coverage this weekend.
Last edited by jspain on 04 Mar 2009, 09:56, edited 1 time in total.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
For anyone suffering combat withdrawal there is a UFC live on Setanta
(waits for outrage at mentioning those three dirty letters)
(waits for outrage at mentioning those three dirty letters)
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
it would be even better if we had elcock v macklin an then the ufc , because i really want to watch it but am goin to the khan show.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
what other advice can I give other than...............get suckingTerence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Back on topic it doesn't really bother me, I very rarely watch the late night stuff(which is usually repeated next morning/afternoon) or Box Office(especially when it's shown for feck all within a week) unless it's a massive fight like Hatton v Mayweather for example.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
dont do that when the baby arrives mate.banjo wrote:what other advice can I give other than...............get suckingTerence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
not nice.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Just avoid the internet and watch the repeats the next day. I only stay awake if it's a huge fight, but the rest I'll just watch Sunday.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Terence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
x2Terence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
They moan when there's too much and they moan when there's too little.
It's a damn shame most people on this forum won't get to see Julio v Kirkland.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
let me clarify my comments.
firstly last saturday night / sunday morning i watched boxing from 7.45 saturday evening until 8am sunday morning. thats 12 hours straight. in hindsight that was not the wisiest thing to do. my comments were propably an over-reaction to that. i know most of you would have taped some of the boxing and watched it on the sunday. maybe i will plan it that way next time. my sky + plus was low on space (it always is) and i had no choice really but to watch one after the other. i quite frankly would not be able to do what i did last weekend , every weekend.
of course i would love the kirkland bill to be on tv - it was me who spread around that setanta survey a few weeks ago asking them for more boxing. maybe that helped us get marquez v diaz.
i want as much boxing on tv as possible. im just saying if there was one weekend where we dont have live american boxing im kind of relieved its this weekend in view of all the boxing we had last weekend and next weekend.
one of my faults is when there is boxing on during the night is that i am not able to sleep and feel i have to watch it live. im glad i caught the live version of the olympians as i understand sky cut the last 3 rounds of skelton v rogan on their repeats and some people had to wait 5 days to see the last 3 rounds on the bbc.
maybe in a roundabout way i am complaining about having 2 domestic bills on the same saturday twice in 3 weeks when there is saturdays available either side of it. i think its lousy that we get overloaded with boxing some weekends and then have hardly any on other weekends.
and on the opening title , i would not say i am happy or glad but more relieved but relieved would not fit in.
if i have further dug my own grave so be it , if my opinion makes me less of a fan so be it. but everyone has an opinion and if no one sees my side then so be it. the world and this forum would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything.
firstly last saturday night / sunday morning i watched boxing from 7.45 saturday evening until 8am sunday morning. thats 12 hours straight. in hindsight that was not the wisiest thing to do. my comments were propably an over-reaction to that. i know most of you would have taped some of the boxing and watched it on the sunday. maybe i will plan it that way next time. my sky + plus was low on space (it always is) and i had no choice really but to watch one after the other. i quite frankly would not be able to do what i did last weekend , every weekend.
of course i would love the kirkland bill to be on tv - it was me who spread around that setanta survey a few weeks ago asking them for more boxing. maybe that helped us get marquez v diaz.
i want as much boxing on tv as possible. im just saying if there was one weekend where we dont have live american boxing im kind of relieved its this weekend in view of all the boxing we had last weekend and next weekend.
one of my faults is when there is boxing on during the night is that i am not able to sleep and feel i have to watch it live. im glad i caught the live version of the olympians as i understand sky cut the last 3 rounds of skelton v rogan on their repeats and some people had to wait 5 days to see the last 3 rounds on the bbc.
maybe in a roundabout way i am complaining about having 2 domestic bills on the same saturday twice in 3 weeks when there is saturdays available either side of it. i think its lousy that we get overloaded with boxing some weekends and then have hardly any on other weekends.
and on the opening title , i would not say i am happy or glad but more relieved but relieved would not fit in.
if i have further dug my own grave so be it , if my opinion makes me less of a fan so be it. but everyone has an opinion and if no one sees my side then so be it. the world and this forum would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
jspain wrote:let me clarify my comments.
firstly last saturday night / sunday morning i watched boxing from 7.45 saturday evening until 8am sunday morning. thats 12 hours straight. in hindsight that was not the wisiest thing to do. my comments were propably an over-reaction to that. i know most of you would have taped some of the boxing and watched it on the sunday. maybe i will plan it that way next time. my sky + plus was low on space (it always is) and i had no choice really but to watch one after the other. i quite frankly would not be able to do what i did last weekend , every weekend.
of course i would love the kirkland bill to be on tv - it was me who spread around that setanta survey a few weeks ago asking them for more boxing. maybe that helped us get marquez v diaz.
i want as much boxing on tv as possible. im just saying if there was one weekend where we dont have live american boxing im kind of relieved its this weekend in view of all the boxing we had last weekend and next weekend.
one of my faults is when there is boxing on during the night is that i am not able to sleep and feel i have to watch it live. im glad i caught the live version of the olympians as i understand sky cut the last 3 rounds of skelton v rogan on their repeats and some people had to wait 5 days to see the last 3 rounds on the bbc.
maybe in a roundabout way i am complaining about having 2 domestic bills on the same saturday twice in 3 weeks when there is saturdays available either side of it. i think its lousy that we get overloaded with boxing some weekends and then have hardly any on other weekends.
and on the opening title , i would not say i am happy or glad but more relieved but relieved would not fit in.
if i have further dug my own grave so be it , if my opinion makes me less of a fan so be it. but everyone has an opinion and if no one sees my side then so be it. the world and this forum would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything.

-
thepocketrocket
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3283
- Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
I'm off to the Chester show, thats my fix for the week!!!
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
lol!Terence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight

Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
X3Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:x2Terence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
They moan when there's too much and they moan when there's too little.
It's a damn shame most people on this forum won't get to see Julio v Kirkland.
Julio vs Kirkland is going to be a war. One can never seem to remember to box & I'm not sure the other one knows how to. Proper old-school "Let's see if the prospect has arrived" fight.
But I am happy with the amount of boxing getting shown recently. It's just that if there was even more I'd be even happier!
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
unfortunately as the year goes on we could miss far more interesting and bigger fights than the kirkland fight this weekend.Datsue wrote:X3Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:x2Terence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
They moan when there's too much and they moan when there's too little.
It's a damn shame most people on this forum won't get to see Julio v Kirkland.
Julio vs Kirkland is going to be a war. One can never seem to remember to box & I'm not sure the other one knows how to. Proper old-school "Let's see if the prospect has arrived" fight.
But I am happy with the amount of boxing getting shown recently. It's just that if there was even more I'd be even happier!
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Definitely one of the most pointless threads ever.
If you don't want to watch it, don't. Turn the fecking telly off!
Some of us would like as much on as possible (quality controlled, of course).
If you don't want to watch it, don't. Turn the fecking telly off!
Some of us would like as much on as possible (quality controlled, of course).
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
jspain is coming in for some right stick for this thread! :)
Give the man a break, all he is saying is that his boxing addiction is inteferring with the rest of his life!
Give the man a break, all he is saying is that his boxing addiction is inteferring with the rest of his life!
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Doesn't quite have the cutting edge to it like the "You're all racist bastards!!!" thread from a few weeks back does it.Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Definitely one of the most pointless threads ever.
I'll give this thread 6/10 for pointlessness.
-
doctorboxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 951
- Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
My advice would be to grow your stubble to that sharp stage and then rub vigorously when she does it, that should be enough to put her off doing it again.Terence wrote:Eh? What next? An O/T strand titled 'My girlfriend keeps throwing her baps in my face, help/advice needed'.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
thanks chinny. at least someone sees where im coming from. all im saying is that i would not be able for 13 hours of boxing on one night every week or every second week. thankfully that only happens once in the blue moon where we have two domestic bills , a german bill and then an american bill tanked on top.chinny wrote:jspain is coming in for some right stick for this thread! :)
Give the man a break, all he is saying is that his boxing addiction is inteferring with the rest of his life!
and for those criticizing me and this thread, how many of you watched the 12 or 13 hours straight through last saturday night. unless you did you not going to see where i am coming from anyway and your not in a position to judge it. i watch any boxing that is on tv (even the fights that look like being crap beforehand). like i said earlier i watch everything live or as close to live as i can (like last saturday) but maybe after watching 12 hours straight i was a little boxed out and needed a break.
my title is wrong as well , i would much have preferred one of last weeks domestic bills to have been on this week rather than last week.
Last edited by jspain on 06 Mar 2009, 12:40, edited 1 time in total.
-
doctorboxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 951
- Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Are you the guy that emails Bunceys show every week - "jim spain, not Jim from Spain"?jspain wrote:thanks chinny. at least someone sees where im coming from. all im saying is that i would not be able for 13 hours of boxing on one night every week or every second week. thankfully that only happens once in the blue moon where we have two domestic bills , a german bill and then an american bill tanked on top.chinny wrote:jspain is coming in for some right stick for this thread! :)
Give the man a break, all he is saying is that his boxing addiction is inteferring with the rest of his life!
and for those criticizing me and this thread, how many of you watched the 12 or 13 hours straight through last saturday night. unless you did you not going to see where i am coming from anyway and your not in a position to judge it. i watch any boxing that is on tv (even the fights that look like being crap beforehand). like i said earlier i watch everything live or as close to live as i can (like last saturday) but maybe after watching 12 hours straight i was a little boxed out and needed a break.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
yeah thats me, i am as much a fan as anyone even though you would not believe it from this thread.doctorboxing wrote:Are you the guy that emails Bunceys show every week - "jim spain, not Jim from Spain"?jspain wrote:thanks chinny. at least someone sees where im coming from. all im saying is that i would not be able for 13 hours of boxing on one night every week or every second week. thankfully that only happens once in the blue moon where we have two domestic bills , a german bill and then an american bill tanked on top.chinny wrote:jspain is coming in for some right stick for this thread! :)
Give the man a break, all he is saying is that his boxing addiction is inteferring with the rest of his life!
and for those criticizing me and this thread, how many of you watched the 12 or 13 hours straight through last saturday night. unless you did you not going to see where i am coming from anyway and your not in a position to judge it. i watch any boxing that is on tv (even the fights that look like being crap beforehand). like i said earlier i watch everything live or as close to live as i can (like last saturday) but maybe after watching 12 hours straight i was a little boxed out and needed a break.
Re: is anyone else glad we have no major boxing on tv sat night?
Chill out jspain we now what you mean, yes it is a pain but eff it it's fun ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)