extremebox do you work for warren

Wilko · Post by **Wilko** » 07 Jul 2004, 10:01

Didn't think it was - main reason being that Bunce wouldn't defend Warren so much.

It was just the addios thing...

lirva33 · Post by **lirva33** » 07 Jul 2004, 14:29

glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.

As for $eif, at least he was positive about the sport and took the time to try and be pleasant to everyone. I guess they don't make trolls like they used to.

Appalling is a bit harsh :(

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 07 Jul 2004, 14:32

lirva33 wrote:
glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.

As for $eif, at least he was positive about the sport and took the time to try and be pleasant to everyone. I guess they don't make trolls like they used to.
Appalling is a bit harsh :(

remember we saved you from a 1000 on roy jones

Eric the Viking · Post by **Eric the Viking** » 07 Jul 2004, 16:03

glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.

Now I concur the latter 3 topics were quite frivolous, but what have you got against coconuts and giant, erm, Iraqnids? Are you Iraqnophobic?

richter-scale · Post by **richter-scale** » 07 Jul 2004, 16:14

Eric the Viking wrote:
glittermonkey wrote:Yes, but we've also wasted pages discussing coconuts, giant Iraqi spiders, Dean Phillips' shorts, boxings worst haircuts and Lirva33's appalling betting record. So you shouldn't be all that touched.
Now I concur the latter 3 topics were quite frivolous, but what have you got against coconuts and giant, erm, Iraqnids? Are you Iraqnophobic?

Yeah, and if Dean's shorts are shite he has a right to be informed...

glittermonkey · Post by **glittermonkey** » 07 Jul 2004, 16:52

Multiple apologies are in order, i believe.

Sorry Lirva, it's just you always seem to be losing. Just think, all the bad luck you've had has to even itself out eventually. My tip is try to bet on Warren's fighters.

Sorry Mr Robinson, but i reckon Dean already knows some of the shorts he wears are shocking. If only he applied the way he fights to the way he picks his shorts. Bring back Pele Reid, best shorts ever seen in a British ring.

Sorry ETV, believe me when i say, i have nothing against the spider population of Iraq. In fact i'm quite sure Iraq has some of the nicest spiders anywhere in the world. As long as they stay away from me then they'll be just fine. Coconuts, on the other hand........i'll sum up my feelings on that subject via the medium of emoticons:

:x

:(

Dynamite Dean Phillips · Post by **Dynamite Dean Phillips** » 08 Jul 2004, 08:50

Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.

Slapsie Maxie · Post by **Slapsie Maxie** » 08 Jul 2004, 09:04

Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.

Do you pay the final installment when they are finished

Sorry, couldn't resist

Dynamite Dean Phillips · Post by **Dynamite Dean Phillips** » 08 Jul 2004, 09:08

Slapsie Maxie wrote:
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.
Do you pay the final installment when they are finished

Sorry, couldn't resist

well, at least I have generated some interest, if just with my shorts (or lack of).

I agree, my old ones weren't up to much, but the new ones are an improvement you must agree.

J · Post by J » 08 Jul 2004, 09:53

Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:
Slapsie Maxie wrote:
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Please don't tell me my new ones are shite, they cost too much.
Do you pay the final installment when they are finished

Sorry, couldn't resist

well, at least I have generated some interest, if just with my shorts (or lack of).

I agree, my old ones weren't up to much, but the new ones are an improvement you must agree.

TO QUOTE MY OLD MAN, I"IT AINT THE SIZE OF THE MAN IN THE FIGHT BUT THE FIGHT IN THE MAN"

similarly it "aint the shorts on the boxer but the boxer in the shorts!"

Dynamite Dean Phillips · Post by **Dynamite Dean Phillips** » 08 Jul 2004, 09:54

J wrote:
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:
Slapsie Maxie wrote: Do you pay the final installment when they are finished

Sorry, couldn't resist

well, at least I have generated some interest, if just with my shorts (or lack of).

I agree, my old ones weren't up to much, but the new ones are an improvement you must agree.
TO QUOTE MY OLD MAN, I"IT AINT THE SIZE OF THE MAN IN THE FIGHT BUT THE FIGHT IN THE MAN"

similarly it "aint the shorts on the boxer but the boxer in the shorts!"

good one

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 08 Jul 2004, 09:55

Yes, originally "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog."

Therefore, "It's not the size of the shorts on the dog,.....err, not wait, that's not it, oh bollocks, doesn't work does it?

J · Post by J » 08 Jul 2004, 09:57

cheers bro its a motto ive lived my life fomr to be honest, i know there are better but hey served me well playing rugby, but then i coudl always hide behind the ref!!! (typical scrum half) by the eway Deano do Lllanelli and my team (Bath) still play for th rag doll mate? Used to be great fixture that. Sorry for ignorance but Ive left the west country and its memories (i sued to go every year to this midweek fixture at the rec) far behind but I do still cherish them.

Dynamite Dean Phillips · Post by **Dynamite Dean Phillips** » 08 Jul 2004, 09:59

J wrote:cheers bro its a motto ive lived my life fomr to be honest, i know there are better but hey served me well playing rugby, but then i coudl always hide behind the ref!!! (typical scrum half) by the eway Deano do Lllanelli and my team (Bath) still play for th rag doll mate? Used to be great fixture that. Sorry for ignorance but Ive left the west country and its memories (i sued to go every year to this midweek fixture at the rec) far behind but I do still cherish them.

You may want to check out the Scarlets Supporters Club forum:

http://www.rugbyrating.co.uk/forum/default.asp

J · Post by J » 08 Jul 2004, 10:01

http://www.bathrugby.co.uk/

s'ok ive got this one

8)

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 08 Jul 2004, 12:53

Undoubtedly the worst shorts in domestic boxing are Oscar Hall's. Looks like he's forgotten his PE kit and the teacher has made him wear some far too small for him.

In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Surely not...

Slapsie Maxie · Post by **Slapsie Maxie** » 08 Jul 2004, 13:00

In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Surely not...[/quote]

Nope, it was his opponent that cost that much

knockout artist · Post by **knockout artist** » 08 Jul 2004, 13:05

Slapsie Maxie wrote:In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Surely not...

Nope, it was his opponent that cost that much[/quote]

Hattons shorts are bloody awful and Michael Gomez shorts are worse. They are illegal in actual fact because they go below the knee.

REAL_DEAL · Post by **REAL_DEAL** » 08 Jul 2004, 13:08

i saw hattons shorts in a glass picture case signed by him when i was in manchester, looked nice.

knockout artist · Post by **knockout artist** » 08 Jul 2004, 13:18

REAL_DEAL wrote:i saw hattons shorts in a glass picture case signed by him when i was in manchester, looked nice.

Looked nice? Thats something his nan would say

I'm afraid tassles and long shorts look terrible on a bloke with milk pale skin.

kevo · Post by **kevo** » 08 Jul 2004, 13:30

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:.

In other shorts trivia, when I went to see Hatton recently, someone told me his shorts cost £800!

Must have paid for them by the inch.