46/1

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 12 Mar 2009, 18:57

Khan via KO/TKO
Macklin via KO/TKO
Enzo via KO/TKO
Martinez via KO/TKO

Worth a fiver

chrisfinch · Post by **chrisfinch** » 12 Mar 2009, 19:30

I'm tempted by that, who is offering those odds?

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 12 Mar 2009, 19:35

bet365 but I dare say if you shopped about you may get better, that was the only one I tried.

E · Post by E » 12 Mar 2009, 19:40

I would be tempted to swap Khan for Barrera. But Otherwise, decent bet.

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 12 Mar 2009, 19:40

sg1985 wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:bet365 but I dare say if you shopped about you may get better, that was the only one I tried.
i may have a look at that tomorrow then, its a decent shout.

who are you backing for the khan fight bet aside?

I'm not, Martinez is my main bet of the night.

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 12 Mar 2009, 19:41

E wrote:I would be tempted to swap Khan for Barrera. But Otherwise, decent bet.

Cover it both ways swapping Khan for Barrera and its about the same price.

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 13 Mar 2009, 03:15

Interesting odds on picking a round for a Macklin win, Paddypower have him 40/1 to win in the 1st, or 33/1 to after that , if you get the round right. Same odds on Elcock

http://www.paddypower.com/bet?action=go ... bir_index=

Barrera at 33/1 to win in the 1st!! did the bookies not see Amir 2 fights ago

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 13 Mar 2009, 05:09

im gonna see if ladbrookes is doing them odds ill stik a 10r on it

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 13 Mar 2009, 07:18

I've had a few quid on Ola Afiobi as well, 7/1 for the win on paddypower,

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 13 Mar 2009, 10:19

poodlepoo wrote:afolabi is dreadful
you have wasted your cash there ian

I think he's a little better than that, he has a very awkward style, not pleasing to the eye.
But he has a bit of a whack on him later in a fight, and a good chin.

With Freddie Roach helping in his training, things might not go right for Macca. Plus we don't know if the Haye loss has left any damage on him

Croydon1 · Post by **Croydon1** » 13 Mar 2009, 11:06

I remember a few months ago Williamhill were offering 50/1 for all 3 brits to stop their opponents (Hatton-Paulie.... Haye-Monte and Calz-Jones)

I was tempted but I didnt back it because I wasnt sure how the Hatton fight would finish but my mate put a tenner on it and was screaming for the ref to stop Roy Jones for that cut in the later rounds. Unfortunately for him it never happened. Juicy odds though

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 13 Mar 2009, 11:08

Also worth pointing out- Oddschecker have Harrison ar 28-1 for tonight with VC.

http://www.oddschecker.com/boxing/paul- ... win-market

You could hedge that and be guaranteed a profit.

forcefraser · Post by **forcefraser** » 13 Mar 2009, 11:35

Money on Martinez is a fairly solid bet. Cannae see Cook getting past him. No power.

whiteboy · Post by **whiteboy** » 13 Mar 2009, 11:35

whicker wrote:Also worth pointing out- Oddschecker have Harrison ar 28-1 for tonight with VC.

http://www.oddschecker.com/boxing/paul- ... win-market

You could hedge that and be guaranteed a profit.

must be mispriced! they have the draw at 5/1 ffs.

If i could get on that site at work i'd be all over it

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 13 Mar 2009, 11:38

whiteboy wrote:
whicker wrote:Also worth pointing out- Oddschecker have Harrison ar 28-1 for tonight with VC.

http://www.oddschecker.com/boxing/paul- ... win-market

You could hedge that and be guaranteed a profit.

must be mispriced! they have the draw at 5/1 ffs.

If i could get on that site at work i'd be all over it

Even if you did they wouldn't pay on it.

Anyway it's been corrected now.

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 13 Mar 2009, 11:50

This link will take you straight to the bet-

http://www.oddschecker.com/betslip.php? ... 6959303556

Might change though or be "updated" before they take your cash.

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 13 Mar 2009, 12:05

Honest m8, even if it takes your bet they wouldn't pay out on it, it would be classed as a palpable error.

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 13 Mar 2009, 12:10

Hagler2002 wrote:Honest m8, even if it takes your bet they wouldn't pay out on it, it would be classed as a palpable error.

Yeah, I'd say you are right. Although, if only a few people take the bet and they are down only a few hundred, they might not press the issue? IE they might just pay up without bothering with the fuss.

mark thompson · Post by **mark thompson** » 13 Mar 2009, 12:28

Hagler2002 wrote:Honest m8, even if it takes your bet they wouldn't pay out on it, it would be classed as a palpable error.

They would must probably have to pay you out, I went in a bookies about 4-5 years ago and had a £10 on Moscow Flyer at 3-1 but the girl behind the counter wrote 33-1 on the slip, when i went to claim, the manager came over and said it was 3-1 and to only pay me £40, I said shes wrote 33-1 so i want £340 thank you, I was arguing with the manager for about 20mins when i said give me my slip back i dont want a pay out today he was still getting all worked up so i snatched my slip back and said im going to see my citizens advice (the building was next door), the lady in there didn't have too much knowledge on the issue but said it was in black and white, I had a copy as did the bookies and they both said 33-1 on them.
I went in the bookies the next day and said id been in contact with the SUN newspaper (which i hadn't) and they would love to take the story on, and would pay me what the bet should pay out £340, 5mins later the manager payed me the full amount and said he didn't want to see me in there again

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 14 Mar 2009, 19:00

Old bones Ian wrote:
poodlepoo wrote:afolabi is dreadful
you have wasted your cash there ian
I think he's a little better than that, he has a very awkward style, not pleasing to the eye.
But he has a bit of a whack on him later in a fight, and a good chin.

With Freddie Roach helping in his training, things might not go right for Macca. Plus we don't know if the Haye loss has left any damage on him

maybe not that awful eh!

Asterix · Post by **Asterix** » 14 Mar 2009, 19:20

Old bones Ian wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
poodlepoo wrote:afolabi is dreadful
you have wasted your cash there ian
I think he's a little better than that, he has a very awkward style, not pleasing to the eye.
But he has a bit of a whack on him later in a fight, and a good chin.

With Freddie Roach helping in his training, things might not go right for Macca. Plus we don't know if the Haye loss has left any damage on him
maybe not that awful eh!

Marvelous.

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 14 Mar 2009, 19:33

Hagler2002 wrote:Khan via KO/TKO
Macklin via KO/TKO
Enzo via KO/TKO
Martinez via KO/TKO

Worth a fiver

Well I never thought it would be Enzo that knocked me out of getting that up.

Still had a good win on Martinez winning by KO/TKO

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 14 Mar 2009, 19:37

I won on Ola and Macklin, and lost of Khan and Cook.

a little down on the whole.

My T Sharp · Post by **My T Sharp** » 14 Mar 2009, 19:39

Hagler2002 wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Khan via KO/TKO
Macklin via KO/TKO
Enzo via KO/TKO
Martinez via KO/TKO

Worth a fiver
Well I never thought it would be Enzo that knocked me out of getting that up.

Still had a good win on Martinez winning by KO/TKO

Unlucky pal. How does the Khan result get settled? Points win?

Edit - Just Checked on Bet365 - Technical Decision = Points

Hagler2002 · Post by **Hagler2002** » 14 Mar 2009, 19:40

My T Sharp wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Khan via KO/TKO
Macklin via KO/TKO
Enzo via KO/TKO
Martinez via KO/TKO

Worth a fiver
Well I never thought it would be Enzo that knocked me out of getting that up.

Still had a good win on Martinez winning by KO/TKO
Unlucky pal. How does the Khan result get settled? Points win?

Just looked into that, it is settled as a points win.

I thought it was in with the KO/TKO

46/1

46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1

Re: 46/1