British Lightweights
British Lightweights
We now arguably have four lightweights on the edge of world/european class AAA, Jono, Murray and Khan, firstly I think its a same non of them have/look like fighting each other. Secondly where do people rate them.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: British Lightweights
1. Khan 2. Thaxton 3. Murray 4. Arthur - Henessey should make Thaxton-Murray
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: British Lightweights
thaxton is done now, reached his level
only chance he gets for a world shot is for marking time fight for a champ who wants an easy defence ala Jennings/Lockett
only chance he gets for a world shot is for marking time fight for a champ who wants an easy defence ala Jennings/Lockett
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5454
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: British Lightweights
None of them are world class. The closest is Khan and he is yet to prove anything against proper quality opposition.
World class is being able to mix it with the likes of JMM, can you honestly see any of the above doing that.
Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Take Enzo for example. Who has he actually beaten? When he steps up, he gets put in his place.
World class is being able to mix it with the likes of JMM, can you honestly see any of the above doing that.
Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Take Enzo for example. Who has he actually beaten? When he steps up, he gets put in his place.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: British Lightweights
agree with this 100%forcefraser wrote:None of them are world class. The closest is Khan and he is yet to prove anything against proper quality opposition.
World class is being able to mix it with the likes of JMM, can you honestly see any of the above doing that.
Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Take Enzo for example. Who has he actually beaten? When he steps up, he gets put in his place.
Britian cannot compete at the top in any sport
Re: British Lightweights
World class is in the top 20 in the world for me (i.e. able to compeet at the top level not having to win). I aggree with your criticism of Enzo's carrer (although don't know how that follows to the conclusion Britain can't compeet in any sport), but I think for a small nation whe have a lot of boxers who are around world class, Haye, Froch, Hatton are all in the top 3/5 in their weights in the world.sweetscience wrote:agree with this 100%forcefraser wrote:None of them are world class. The closest is Khan and he is yet to prove anything against proper quality opposition.
World class is being able to mix it with the likes of JMM, can you honestly see any of the above doing that.
Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Take Enzo for example. Who has he actually beaten? When he steps up, he gets put in his place.
Britian cannot compete at the top in any sport
I worry that Thaxton is done but I thought that after the Romanov gight I think his level is just at the edge of european level. I'd really like to see the Thaxton Murray fight cos then we would see how good Muaary is, I think styalistcally it makes for an exciting fight.
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: British Lightweights
as a country we are fringe world class (my meaning of world class being the elite) in all sportsjosh fg wrote:World class is in the top 20 in the world for me (i.e. able to compeet at the top level not having to win). I aggree with your criticism of Enzo's carrer (although don't know how that follows to the conclusion Britain can't compeet in any sport), but I think for a small nation whe have a lot of boxers who are around world class, Haye, Froch, Hatton are all in the top 3/5 in their weights in the world.sweetscience wrote:agree with this 100%forcefraser wrote:None of them are world class. The closest is Khan and he is yet to prove anything against proper quality opposition.
World class is being able to mix it with the likes of JMM, can you honestly see any of the above doing that.
Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Take Enzo for example. Who has he actually beaten? When he steps up, he gets put in his place.
Britian cannot compete at the top in any sport
I worry that Thaxton is done but I thought that after the Romanov gight I think his level is just at the edge of european level. I'd really like to see the Thaxton Murray fight cos then we would see how good Muaary is, I think styalistcally it makes for an exciting fight.
but as u say we are only a small country so we do well in a sense
Re: British Lightweights
Lockett had a crap record and was only a borderline top 10 British Middleweight.forcefraser wrote:Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
-
Raff The Frenchman
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 497
- Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: British Lightweights
didnt Thaxton get recently owned by unherald french journeyman Mezaache? heck Mezaache sucks big time, so what's the deal with Thaxton?Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:1. Khan 2. 3. Murray 4. Arthur - Henessey should make Thaxton-Murray
Re: British Lightweights
Andy Murray can compete at the top level in tennis.sweetscience wrote:Britian cannot compete at the top in any sport
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: British Lightweights
!st Murray
2nd Khan
3rd Thaxton but i think he is past it
4th AAA not at the top 2 level
2nd Khan
3rd Thaxton but i think he is past it
4th AAA not at the top 2 level
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: British Lightweights
ok change the word compete to winHorse wrote:Andy Murray can compete at the top level in tennis.sweetscience wrote:Britian cannot compete at the top in any sport
i hate to say it but we choke at top level, very top
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: British Lightweights
how can we put murray at the topalexpaterson wrote:!st Murray
2nd Khan
3rd Thaxton but i think he is past it
4th AAA not at the top 2 level
he hasnt fought anyone of note
he may well be the best but unless he ups his caliber of opponent we cant give him the top spot
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: British Lightweights
world class is not JMM, That's elite (world class is when can compete against a top 15 fighter in a division and I thinkforcefraser wrote:None of them are world class. The closest is Khan and he is yet to prove anything against proper quality opposition.
World class is being able to mix it with the likes of JMM, can you honestly see any of the above doing that.
Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Take Enzo for example. Who has he actually beaten? When he steps up, he gets put in his place.
Khan & Murray can do that).
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5454
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: British Lightweights
Matey, how do you make Locketts record crap???Horse wrote:Lockett had a crap record and was only a borderline top 10 British Middleweight.forcefraser wrote:Look at Jennings and Lockett. Great records, talented at domestic level, stepped up into genuine world class and the brutal truth was evident. The gulf between genuine world class and looking good in Britain is huge.
Going into the Pavlik fight he had 31 fights, 30 wins, 21 of them by knockout. Only one defeat. How on earth is that a crap record?? OK the fighters on there might have been shitty, but that was the point I was trying to make.
They come with great looking records, but it means jack shit when they get in with proper world class opponents.
Re: British Lightweights
Britain has had very few real world class boxers, sure some have been very good British and even european level guys, but they struggle to mix it with the real top world class guys about.sweetscience wrote:
as a country we are fringe world class (my meaning of world class being the elite) in all sports
but as u say we are only a small country so we do well in a sense
Calzaghe didn`t mix it with the top guys at the weight till they - and himself, were past their sell by date.
Naz, beat up on old former world class guys .. but failed in his 1st real serious test.
I my life time - we have never had anybody to compare to a Barrera, Mayweather jr., Jones jr., Cotto etc......
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5454
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: British Lightweights
Lennox Lewis was true world class. Although he learnt his trade in Canada. He was British, but he was not trained and brought up in Britain.tonyevs wrote:Britain has had very few real world class boxers, sure some have been very good British and even european level guys, but they struggle to mix it with the real top world class guys about.sweetscience wrote:
as a country we are fringe world class (my meaning of world class being the elite) in all sports
but as u say we are only a small country so we do well in a sense
Calzaghe didn`t mix it with the top guys at the weight till they - and himself, were past their sell by date.
Naz, beat up on old former world class guys .. but failed in his 1st real serious test.
I my life time - we have never had anybody to compare to a Barrera, Mayweather jr., Jones jr., Cotto etc......
The guy who smashed up Maccaranelli last night, started off in Britain, goes to the states to learn his trade. The difference out there is sparring, they swear by it. Sparring hard and long will set you up, rather than beating up no hopers on Friday fight night cards.
Re: British Lightweights
Well maybe that is something to do with it?
Its a debate that has run and run .. is lennox English or Canadian?? I just got the impression he used the British conection to fast track himself .. he fought for Canada in the Commonwealth and Olympics, he sounds more Canadian than British .. he works in the USA, and he chose to live in Jamaica ..
Its a debate that has run and run .. is lennox English or Canadian?? I just got the impression he used the British conection to fast track himself .. he fought for Canada in the Commonwealth and Olympics, he sounds more Canadian than British .. he works in the USA, and he chose to live in Jamaica ..
Re: British Lightweights
Because it was.forcefraser wrote:Matey, how do you make Locketts record crap???
His record stops looking good if one just takes a quick look at the names on it. That is not a good record as far as I am concerned.forcefraser wrote:Going into the Pavlik fight he had 31 fights, 30 wins, 21 of them by knockout. Only one defeat. How on earth is that a crap record?? OK the fighters on there might have been shitty, but that was the point I was trying to make.
Lockett does not represent the typical British fighter who gets a World title shot. He never fought for the British or Commonwealth titles and he never beat a top 5 British fighter. He sucked.
Does this even need to be said?forcefraser wrote:They come with great looking records, but it means jack shit when they get in with proper world class opponents.
Re: British Lightweights
Lewis won the British Title. Makes him british in my eyes. And commenting on the top 4 lightweights my choice would be going on merit.
1 - Alex Arthur (won, British, European and commonwealth title's)
2 - John Murray (Current British Champion)
3 - Amir Khan (won commonwelth)
4 - Jonathan Thaxton (would of been higher if he didnt lose a simple fight)
1 - Alex Arthur (won, British, European and commonwealth title's)
2 - John Murray (Current British Champion)
3 - Amir Khan (won commonwelth)
4 - Jonathan Thaxton (would of been higher if he didnt lose a simple fight)
-
world ranked
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2199
- Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21
Re: British Lightweights
I just don't think Murray or Arthur to have an easier time than Khan did against Barrera and we also
saying Alex Arthur (weight drained or not who lost his title @126 & 130) is better than MAB even right
now its hard to believe that.
saying Alex Arthur (weight drained or not who lost his title @126 & 130) is better than MAB even right
now its hard to believe that.
-
alexpaterson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4310
- Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22
Re: British Lightweights
But really Khan hasnt fought any one either except MAB and he won because of a cut MAB couldnt see so u cant judge him on thatsweetscience wrote:how can we put murray at the topalexpaterson wrote:!st Murray
2nd Khan
3rd Thaxton but i think he is past it
4th AAA not at the top 2 level
he hasnt fought anyone of note
he may well be the best but unless he ups his caliber of opponent we cant give him the top spot
Re: British Lightweights
He won because he was younger bigger and faster and MAB's skills and experiance couldn't negate that.alexpaterson wrote:But really Khan hasnt fought any one either except MAB and he won because of a cut MAB couldnt see so u cant judge him on thatsweetscience wrote:how can we put murray at the topalexpaterson wrote:!st Murray
2nd Khan
3rd Thaxton but i think he is past it
4th AAA not at the top 2 level
he hasnt fought anyone of note
he may well be the best but unless he ups his caliber of opponent we cant give him the top spot
-
Raff The Frenchman
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 497
- Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: British Lightweights
not even, there was simply so much blood on Barrera"s face from round 1 there was no way he could fight, you couldn't even tell if he was or not too old.josh fg wrote: He won because he was younger bigger and faster and MAB's skills and experiance couldn't negate that.
Re: British Lightweights
.... and because he's got one hell of a hard head.