Dawson v McPhie - Marquess of Queensbury Rules

Post Reply
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Dawson v McPhie - Marquess of Queensbury Rules

Post by Marlin »

Is this something Dan might be looking at? If McPhie wants to keep going in boxing Dawson might want to see if he can get a little payback?

What do you blokes think?
Jason77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13
Joined: 16 Feb 2009, 02:40

Re: Dawson v McPhie - Marquess of Queensbury Rules

Post by Jason77 »

Dawson would eat him alive. Preacher really dosn't bring anything to Queensbury rules (besides some durability from having stepped in the ring with some of the top Thai boxers). Preacher would be stupid to take the fight, but probably would if the money is right.

P.S. Speaking of Thai boxers, I'm super keen to get some footage of JWP Vs Sika, as I love Sika and Wayne is a friend, I think that would've of been a war. Does anyone know where I could get that bout on dvd?
Jason77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13
Joined: 16 Feb 2009, 02:40

Re: Dawson v McPhie - Marquess of Queensbury Rules

Post by Jason77 »

P.P.S. I don't think McPhie has any real love for Queensbury boxing, I think he would just take any fight if the money was right.
Hounddawg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4035
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:50

Re: Dawson v McPhie - Marquess of Queensbury Rules

Post by Hounddawg »

Saw the preacher fight against Hartman, Preacher is not a boxer, despite what avid Kick boxing fans say.

Dawson would pummel Preacher for 3 rounds before the ref would stop the fight.
Post Reply