SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 17 Mar 2009, 14:54

Apparently SKY have turned down Kell Brook v Mark Lloyd, so the fight might be off.

I can't see this one going ahead without TV

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 17 Mar 2009, 14:58

I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.

Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.

sweetscience · Post by **sweetscience** » 17 Mar 2009, 15:02

fighting Lloyds is a waste of EVERYONES time & money

whiteboy · Post by **whiteboy** » 17 Mar 2009, 15:33

Broadhurst v. TBA

with jamie cox vs mark lloyd support

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 17 Mar 2009, 15:47

whiteboy wrote:Broadhurst v. TBA

with jamie cox vs mark lloyd support

Cox v Lloyd makes loads more sense. Brook should be looking alot higher

Fancy Cox to tear him up to be honest - LLoyd is brave but will be there to be hit IMO.

Broadhurst is a cracking little fighter - he did really well to get the KO in his last match against the tough Ghanian.

Adamj1987 · Post by **Adamj1987** » 17 Mar 2009, 15:49

Horse wrote:I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.

Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.

ive read that too

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 17 Mar 2009, 15:52

Horse wrote:I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.

Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.

If Brook leaves his chin up in the air as I have seen him do on occasions in the past, the Mutt will find it with his left hook..

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 17 Mar 2009, 16:07

TerribleTerry wrote:
Horse wrote:I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.

Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.
If Brook leaves his chin up in the air as I have seen him do on occasions in the past, the Mutt will find it with his left hook..

yep, i agree with all who've said Lloyd shouldn't have got the shot at Brook. also that Cox should bust him up within 6-8

TT- by the way, i heard a little whisper that Mutt has sparred Brook and did pretty well. of all the many decent welters out there, Mutt may be the worst matchup for Brook, because of his power and his patience in waiting to land one when the time is right

housesecond · Post by **housesecond** » 17 Mar 2009, 16:11

Whats going on? Since when did Sky reject poor fights? I don't want to have to renew my subscription.

DG. · Post by **DG.** » 17 Mar 2009, 16:50

Maybe they can start putting other decent boxing on then I might re-join!

brian13 · Post by **brian13** » 17 Mar 2009, 17:56

whiteboy wrote:Broadhurst v. TBA

with jamie cox vs mark lloyd support

Broadhurst will be against an African but good for sky because Brook / Elwell was a farce of a fight and Brook / Mutley sounds like a great fight compared to Brook / Lloyd

TerribleTerry · Post by **TerribleTerry** » 17 Mar 2009, 18:20

Counter-puncher wrote: yep, i agree with all who've said Lloyd shouldn't have got the shot at Brook. also that Cox should bust him up within 6-8

TT- by the way, i heard a little whisper that Mutt has sparred Brook and did pretty well. of all the many decent welters out there, Mutt may be the worst matchup for Brook, because of his power and his patience in waiting to land one when the time is right

Nice insight CP

As you say, Muttley is an extremely patient counter puncher. I think he is strong enough to survive the early Brook on slaught and if he can time the youngster when he lets his hands go, I certainly wouldnt put it passed the Black Country fighter to find the shots needed to beat this up start..

emma · Post by **emma** » 17 Mar 2009, 18:41

Horse wrote:I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.

Where did you read this? anyway I thought muttley was a light welter?

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 17 Mar 2009, 18:57

emma wrote:
Horse wrote:I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.
Where did you read this? anyway I thought muttley was a light welter?

Mutley moved back up to Welterweight after he lost to Colin Lynes about 18 months ago.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/sho ... p?t=128946

emma · Post by **emma** » 17 Mar 2009, 19:01

Horse wrote:
emma wrote:
Horse wrote:I have read that it is now Kell Brook vs Young Mutley.Well done to Sky for rejecting a poor fight.
Where did you read this? anyway I thought muttley was a light welter?
Mutley moved back up to Welterweight after he lost to Colin Lynes about 18 months ago.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/sho ... p?t=128946

Oh should be a good fight. I remember when Muttley fought Jennings I was rooting for him to win. Ive always been a fan of Muttley but this time I will be rooting for Kell 100% of course.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 18 Mar 2009, 05:56

Brook Vs Mutley is a good fight. Brook is a class act and I'd fancy him to win it, but Mutley is a dangerous and established operator who could give Kels chin abit of a workout

iwz678 · Post by **iwz678** » 18 Mar 2009, 13:48

looking forward to Brook v Mutley, love Kell think he's a fantastic boxer and even though Mutley has the experience, I think Kell will have a bit too much for him.

danfoster · Post by **danfoster** » 18 Mar 2009, 17:29

I don't think that kell does particularly leave his chin up in the air - he has been known to jump in in the past but not for some time now. He's patient and i expect kell to bust him up with the jab then stop him in the midr-ounds ... in terms of kell showing what he can do, he has only scratched the surface, trust me.

also, there's nothing wrong with his chin. far from it, actually - he is the full package.

really pleased with the mutt fight though - a real test against a proper decent puncher. can't wait.

emma · Post by **emma** » 18 Mar 2009, 19:21

iwz678 wrote:looking forward to Brook v Mutley, love Kell think he's a fantastic boxer and even though Mutley has the experience, I think Kell will have a bit too much for him.

o....k. anyway i think kell will ko muttley. GO KELL!

whicker · Post by **whicker** » 18 Mar 2009, 20:22

Yeah, Brook V Mut is a much better fight.

If that goes ahead, nice one- I may well travel to it. I'd like to see Brook tested, he does look the business.

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 19 Mar 2009, 06:08

Actually it was SN Who didn't want Lloyd, and as Brook is injured this whole post is irelevant.

Counter-puncher · Post by **Counter-puncher** » 19 Mar 2009, 06:12

TerribleTerry wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote: yep, i agree with all who've said Lloyd shouldn't have got the shot at Brook. also that Cox should bust him up within 6-8

TT- by the way, i heard a little whisper that Mutt has sparred Brook and did pretty well. of all the many decent welters out there, Mutt may be the worst matchup for Brook, because of his power and his patience in waiting to land one when the time is right
Nice insight CP

As you say, Muttley is an extremely patient counter puncher. I think he is strong enough to survive the early Brook on slaught and if he can time the youngster when he lets his hands go, I certainly wouldnt put it passed the Black Country fighter to find the shots needed to beat this up start..

I'm not a betting man Tezza but decent odds on a Muttley stoppage win would tempt me

Gazmac81 · Post by **Gazmac81** » 19 Mar 2009, 06:14

boxingchat wrote:Actually it was SN Who didn't want Lloyd, and as Brook is injured this whole post is irelevant.

so why did The fight against Llloyd get announced on allegedly Tv then
and this is the 2nd time they tried to get him

the Boxing board refused the first time and then somehow agreed the second

So Brooks not fighting Muttley now ?

danfoster · Post by **danfoster** » 19 Mar 2009, 07:33

Boxingchat is wrong there - SN did want Lloyd. I know this because Dean Powell phoned me up and persuaded me that it was a better match than i had previously thought.

Dean felt that Lloyd was a real tough guy who would extend Brook and be a very good test.

I'm sure Dean would confirm this because he was very passionate about his defence of this match.

Brook has been injured but is in full training now and definitely would have been fit for that date - April 24th.

Deserter · Post by **Deserter** » 19 Mar 2009, 07:52

danfoster wrote:Boxingchat is wrong there - SN did want Lloyd. I know this because Dean Powell phoned me up and persuaded me that it was a better match than i had previously thought.

Dean felt that Lloyd was a real tough guy who would extend Brook and be a very good test.

I'm sure Dean would confirm this because he was very passionate about his defence of this match.

Brook has been injured but is in full training now and definitely would have been fit for that date - April 24th.

Boxingchat well and truly owned. That was a pleasure to read!

SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.

Re: SKY don't want Brook v LLoyd.