Clinton Woods /IBF

Post Reply
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27504
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Clinton Woods /IBF

Post by stujones »

His fight with Muriqi was supposed to be an eliminator for the #2 position. How come in the updated rankings the #2 is considered vacant and Woods is at #3. It is updated cause Muriqi is now back down to #15.

Hope FA are on the case here.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Clinton Woods /IBF

Post by jonny »

stujones wrote:His fight with Muriqi was supposed to be an eliminator for the #2 position. How come in the updated rankings the #2 is considered vacant and Woods is at #3. It is updated cause Muriqi is now back down to #15.

Hope FA are on the case here.
You sure they are updated because Muriqi was at 15 before the fight
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: Clinton Woods /IBF

Post by Scrap »

Are there two eliminaters.
Post Reply