Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by WildWaylon »

hoop wrote:I'll tell anyone who will listen Kenny Anderson will steam through the lot of them before the end of the year, he's miles better than them all.
Its nice to hear about rising stars. Divisions often had a habit of drying up at one time but not any more. Lots of Interesting young blood are turning pro now.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Counter-puncher »

Neri wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Bloody lost to Bendall too.
Which many have said was highly contentious I must add.
Bendall is now a gatekeeper, with all respect due to him. he isn't committing to his punches anymore and spends a lot of time spoiling.

Elcock smashed the absolute granny out of Bendall. McDermott beat him comfortably

if Smith is so good, if he's the fighter those in scouseland make him out to be at British level, he shouldn't have left the judges in any doubt at all with Bendall.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by black panther »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Neri wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Bloody lost to Bendall too.
Which many have said was highly contentious I must add.
Bendall is now a gatekeeper, with all respect due to him. he isn't committing to his punches anymore and spends a lot of time spoiling.

Elcock smashed the absolute granny out of Bendall. McDermott beat him comfortably

if Smith is so good, if he's the fighter those in scouseland make him out to be at British level, he shouldn't have left the judges in any doubt at all with Bendall.
Agreed :TU: I rate Smith, I think he's a good fighter but if he was that good he should have stopped Bendall like Barker and Elcock did. Also, he always looks a bit soft at middleweight, I dunno if thats just his body-type but I get the impression he could make lightmiddleweight.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by jBacca »

I think with Smith it's the case of he could be that good, not is that good.

It's so frustrating watching Smith put on a beautiful performance, then next bout looking really uncomfortable and not showing us what he can do.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Counter-puncher »

jBacca wrote:I think with Smith it's the case of he could be that good, not is that good.

It's so frustrating watching Smith put on a beautiful performance, then next bout looking really uncomfortable and not showing us what he can do.

is it coincidence, the 'beautiful performances' seem to be against guys with 17-11 type records and the uncomfortable ones against people remotely his own level?
leeharding
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 589
Joined: 03 Jan 2009, 16:18

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by leeharding »

teddy007 wrote:
terrdilk wrote:teddy I don't now who u r but I wouldn't have a problem saying anything to your face your the one tryin to belittle me on a forum saying a would get knocked out who r u to say that agreed Paul is a step above my level but in he future who can say wot will happen I'm improving all the time. An I'm a super middle not light heavy only moved up for prizefighter. Saying that going off the subject I still think everyone is under estimating Quigley I think he will do it
I'm not trying to belittle you i just think you will get knocked out by Paul Smith.
lol thats funny very very true tho does smigga come on here hopefully he does im sure he would agree he knock them all out :box:
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by jBacca »

Counter-puncher wrote:
jBacca wrote:I think with Smith it's the case of he could be that good, not is that good.

It's so frustrating watching Smith put on a beautiful performance, then next bout looking really uncomfortable and not showing us what he can do.

is it coincidence, the 'beautiful performances' seem to be against guys with 17-11 type records and the uncomfortable ones against people remotely his own level?
I wouldn't necessarily say so, he's put on better performances against some of his more difficult opponents whereas he's not performed to his best against some of the weaker ones. He just seems to blow hot and cold, hopefully he's on the way up training back in Liverpool.

I do agree he's not faced anyone of note just yet.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Counter-puncher »

fair play mate you have seen more than i have of him, probably :TU:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Dioufy »

I have only watched Smith/Renda on the Haye/Macca undercard, and he looked bad that night - I even think I had him behind when Smith stopped him. And losing to Bendall, who is okay, but nothing special just makes me think that this dude won't make it.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by jBacca »

Smigga was really poor against Renda, but fortunately got the stoppage.

Since the Bendall loss he's gone back to his roots, so here's hoping :TU:
Chris W 1982
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 12:32

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Chris W 1982 »

At the end of the day, its a good local scrap that is hard to call. I think Quigley will win, then i'm hoping a fight can be made between Smith and Quigley.
unorthodox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 46
Joined: 23 Mar 2009, 23:56

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by unorthodox »

haha pyar online fisticuffs goin on here!!!
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Gazmac81 »

hoop wrote:I'll tell anyone who will listen Kenny Anderson will steam through the lot of them before the end of the year, he's miles better than them all.
Agreed hope he gets his chance this year

Knock out power is there for all to see
teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by teddy007 »

Gazmac81 wrote:
hoop wrote:I'll tell anyone who will listen Kenny Anderson will steam through the lot of them before the end of the year, he's miles better than them all.
Agreed hope he gets his chance this year

Knock out power is there for all to see
I do like the look of him but don't think he will be genuine world class.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28500
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Coco »

Agreed, Anderson is the best prospect out there and hopefully he is past his managerial difficulties now so he can push ahead
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by Asterix »

Sky will show Kenny Anderson's fight this Friday won't they? I'm really looking forward to seeing him for the first time.
hoop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 112
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:34

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by hoop »

teddy007 wrote:
Gazmac81 wrote:
hoop wrote:I'll tell anyone who will listen Kenny Anderson will steam through the lot of them before the end of the year, he's miles better than them all.
Agreed hope he gets his chance this year

Knock out power is there for all to see
I do like the look of him but don't think he will be genuine world class.
Maybe not mate, but being a sports network fighter it wont stop him wining a world title, On the subject of the British title though i think King may well go the distance, given that he has only ever been stopped on a cut, but regarding the other supermiddles ie Dodson, Smith, Quigley etc i doubt any of them would last 7 rounds.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27507
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by stujones »

None of them deserve it really. I like and rate Dodson, but what has he done to warrant a shot (and remember he was meant to be fighting Magee). Yes, he was a champion but he had his chance at redemption and got beat.

Smiths wins in the states haven't really got much attention here - remember he beat a guy (Banks), who beat Elvin Ayala (twice) who did okay against Abraham. But since then he has done nothing to warrant a shot.

I don't want to do any of the 3 mentioned a disservice, but I would like to see something half representing a RECENT meaningful win before getting such a shot.
hoop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 112
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 14:34

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by hoop »

stujones wrote:None of them deserve it really. I like and rate Dodson, but what has he done to warrant a shot (and remember he was meant to be fighting Magee). Yes, he was a champion but he had his chance at redemption and got beat.

Smiths wins in the states haven't really got much attention here - remember he beat a guy (Banks), who beat Elvin Ayala (twice) who did okay against Abraham. But since then he has done nothing to warrant a shot.

I don't want to do any of the 3 mentioned a disservice, but I would like to see something half representing a RECENT meaningful win before getting such a shot.
Your right mate, if you look at some off the other weights none of these guys would be near getting a shot at the British.
avidlemon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 234
Joined: 28 Jun 2008, 10:14

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by avidlemon »

hoop wrote:I'll tell anyone who will listen Kenny Anderson will steam through the lot of them before the end of the year, he's miles better than them all.
Bull shit, Anderson has not earned the right to fight at that level yet. Last performance on sky left a lot to be desried!
Smigga would walk through the whole british smw division, bar froch, but once he gets stepped up a level, he will have the tool to take on someone like froch on a competitive level
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by hurlock »

teddy007 wrote:
terrdilk wrote:teddy I don't now who u r but I wouldn't have a problem saying anything to your face your the one tryin to belittle me on a forum saying a would get knocked out who r u to say that agreed Paul is a step above my level but in he future who can say wot will happen I'm improving all the time. An I'm a super middle not light heavy only moved up for prizefighter. Saying that going off the subject I still think everyone is under estimating Quigley I think he will do it
I'm not trying to belittle you i just think you will get knocked out by Paul Smith.
:roll: treat people how you want to be treated teddy :wink:

smith is a very strong fighter, i wouldnt say he's a bigtime banger.but would bang out dodson,him & quigley would be a good contest.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by steve689 »

Smith's comments are probably born out of frustration. He is being wasted with these spurious WBX Intergalactic titles his management seem to be putting him in, instead of pushing his cause for the British belt. I feel his career may be stalled beyond repair if they don't get a move on.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by DG. »

diggler wrote:think smigga would beat every british super middle fighter bar froch. the thing is with smith is he will raise his game as the better the opponent gets tougher

Agree...
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by hurlock »

people keep hooting on about renda who's a decent kid he gave murray a good scrap & is much improved.

love to see a prize fighter over 5 rds over a couple of weeks with macklin, smith,barker,quigley,murray,mcdermott,duddy,lee, thirlwall,elcock & more to make up the numbers.
bigdaddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 504
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 15:46

Re: Paul Smith: Dodson & Quigley don't deserve it

Post by bigdaddy »

Paul smith a top lad
Post Reply