Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
My personal opinion has been that the knockdown was genuine, but that the "knockout" was not.
I think Liston was the victim of a flash knockdown. That kind of knockdown can happen to anyone. For example, it happened to iron-chined Rocky Marciano against Jersey Joe Walcott in round one of their first fight - and Walcott was not known as a devastating puncher.
However, I think Liston could have gotten right back up. It anyone's guess why he chose to flop around like a fish out of water for 20 seconds before he finally getting to his feet.
I think Liston was the victim of a flash knockdown. That kind of knockdown can happen to anyone. For example, it happened to iron-chined Rocky Marciano against Jersey Joe Walcott in round one of their first fight - and Walcott was not known as a devastating puncher.
However, I think Liston could have gotten right back up. It anyone's guess why he chose to flop around like a fish out of water for 20 seconds before he finally getting to his feet.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Apparently, it isn't anyone's guess, because Collins has figured it out --- no if's, & or but's. He doesn't know any better than you or I what really happened, but in making up his own mind, he sees fit to also read statements from me which aren't there.raylawpc wrote:My personal opinion has been that the knockdown was genuine, but that the "knockout" was not.
I think Liston was the victim of a flash knockdown. That kind of knockdown can happen to anyone. For example, it happened to iron-chined Rocky Marciano against Jersey Joe Walcott in round one of their first fight - and Walcott was not known as a devastating puncher.
However, I think Liston could have gotten right back up. It anyone's guess why he chose to flop around like a fish out of water for 20 seconds before he finally getting to his feet.
For the record, only Granberry would actually blame Ali for the outcome. I don't. No reasonable person can.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Apparently, it isn't anyone's guess, because Collins has figured it out --- no if's, & or but's. He doesn't know any better than you or I what really happened, but in making up his own mind, he sees fit to also read statements from me which aren't there.raylawpc wrote:My personal opinion has been that the knockdown was genuine, but that the "knockout" was not.
I think Liston was the victim of a flash knockdown. That kind of knockdown can happen to anyone. For example, it happened to iron-chined Rocky Marciano against Jersey Joe Walcott in round one of their first fight - and Walcott was not known as a devastating puncher.
However, I think Liston could have gotten right back up. It anyone's guess why he chose to flop around like a fish out of water for 20 seconds before he finally getting to his feet.
For the record, only Granberry would actually blame Ali for the outcome. I don't. No reasonable person can.
Based on what I saw, Liston bailed out.
Not sure what your opinion is, mate. All I've seen from you so far is a load of gibberish which seems to end up blaming Ali (or is it the Ali industry) for the whole fiasco.
Perhaps you could spell out your views on the fight without resorting to the actions of a teenage drama queen? Come on, Irene, you can do it if you try.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
i went with the option that had beer in it.
-
Rick Farris
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7200
- Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 16:04
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
BoxBuzz wrote:Rick, what you say rings true to me. However my guess is that we part ways (perhaps only slightly) in that I have no trouble imagining that all of these factors may be somewhat evident in this story. "Slight of hand" is all about speed and deception....which on occasion can be deceptively powerful. I choose those words carefully, and believe them to be true, in this case on several levels. That moment has enigma written all over it.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
"Based on what I saw, Liston bailed out.
Not sure what your opinion is, mate. All I've seen from you so far is a load of gibberish which seems to end up blaming Ali (or is it the Ali industry) for the whole fiasco.
Perhaps you could spell out your views on the fight without resorting to the actions of a teenage drama queen? Come on, Irene, you can do it if you try.
" - Collins
To be honest --- & to clarify, as per your request --- I don't really have an opinion. I find a lot of credence in several scenarios, leaving the waters muddied for me. Maybe he bailed to avoid a beating, maybe the mob or NOI (there was certainly enough dirt on Liston for him to have dove in both fights, & I've always had a nagging doubt about the original 1964 bout), maybe he felt he couldn't beat Ali (or didn't care --- it's widely-reported he stopped training when the clash was post-poned) & wanted to take away from Ali's victory.
They all seem pretty plausible, from all I've read & researched. One thing I cannot possibly do is hold what happened against Ali, so let's you & I get that perfectly clear. On the other hand, it's hard to credit him for the fight much, either. I am, after all, not part of the great man's industry of worshippers (One thing --- possibly the only thing --- Granberry nailed was no fighter inspires such jaw-dropping, starry-eyed bullshit from fanatics as does Ali).
Now, who's more reasonable, & therefore less Granberry-esque --- myself, who thinks several scenarios are possible, or you, who takes the one lending most credence to Ali, in between making weak attempts to undermine me by calling me, "Irene."
Not sure what your opinion is, mate. All I've seen from you so far is a load of gibberish which seems to end up blaming Ali (or is it the Ali industry) for the whole fiasco.
Perhaps you could spell out your views on the fight without resorting to the actions of a teenage drama queen? Come on, Irene, you can do it if you try.
To be honest --- & to clarify, as per your request --- I don't really have an opinion. I find a lot of credence in several scenarios, leaving the waters muddied for me. Maybe he bailed to avoid a beating, maybe the mob or NOI (there was certainly enough dirt on Liston for him to have dove in both fights, & I've always had a nagging doubt about the original 1964 bout), maybe he felt he couldn't beat Ali (or didn't care --- it's widely-reported he stopped training when the clash was post-poned) & wanted to take away from Ali's victory.
They all seem pretty plausible, from all I've read & researched. One thing I cannot possibly do is hold what happened against Ali, so let's you & I get that perfectly clear. On the other hand, it's hard to credit him for the fight much, either. I am, after all, not part of the great man's industry of worshippers (One thing --- possibly the only thing --- Granberry nailed was no fighter inspires such jaw-dropping, starry-eyed bullshit from fanatics as does Ali).
Now, who's more reasonable, & therefore less Granberry-esque --- myself, who thinks several scenarios are possible, or you, who takes the one lending most credence to Ali, in between making weak attempts to undermine me by calling me, "Irene."
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
For a man who claims not to have an opinion, you seem mighty excited about thisGoodnight, Irene wrote: To be honest --- & to clarify, as per your request --- I don't really have an opinion.
Would that be a worshipping fanatic like me, mate? If not, then which of the posters here are you trying to insult?Goodnight, Irene wrote: I am, after all, not part of the great man's industry of worshippers (One thing --- possibly the only thing --- Granberry nailed was no fighter inspires such jaw-dropping, starry-eyed bullshit from fanatics as does Ali).
Why, you of course. After all, I'm just an Ali shill aren't I?Goodnight, Irene wrote: Now, who's more reasonable, & therefore less Granberry-esque --- myself, who thinks several scenarios are possible, or you, who takes the one lending most credence to Ali
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
More, "quotes" from me which've never been made.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Really?Goodnight, Irene wrote:More, "quotes" from me which've never been made.
Then who are all the 'fanatics' spouting 'bullsh*t' to whom you allude?
Mate, if you want to label people, no problem. But don't label them and then claim you didn't. That's the sort of hypocricy that the real granberry would be proud of.
I'll ask you again. Who are these 'fanatics' you keep referring to?
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
I'm not speaking of specific people on this forum. I stated no fighter inspires such propaganda as does Ali. That is a statement on boxing fans, in general --- not a mark on you, or anyone else.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Alright, mate.Goodnight, Irene wrote:I'm not speaking of specific people on this forum. I stated no fighter inspires such propaganda as does Ali. That is a statement on boxing fans, in general --- not a mark on you, or anyone else.
But remember. There are legitimate reasons why Ali is seen by many knowledgable fans as the greatest heavyweight of all time. And notice I said 'greatest heavyweight'.
It's not all smoke and mirrors with a bunch of simpletons being led by the nose by a pied piper employed by the "Ali Industry" chanting mantras to The Greatest.
There is substance to the claim; and as a boxing fan you know that.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Collins..you mean the greatest after Larry Holmes :)
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
I always like Larry. Best heavy since Ali for me.Robinson wrote:Collins..you mean the greatest after Larry Holmes :)
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Here's a slow motion clip of the "infamous" knockdown in Clay-Liston II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T_dHRLn5rM
Everyone can decide for themselves about the punch and resulting knockdown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T_dHRLn5rM
Everyone can decide for themselves about the punch and resulting knockdown.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
..boxbuzz knows a lot about boxing and i know a lot more than he does. i don't know anything about head injuries though, so i am at least willing to concede he may be right about the effects of that punch.
i would have come here with my post earlier, but i was upset with buzzy's referring to something as VERY unique, when unique cannot have a modifier. something is either unique or not,. period.
plus, he refers to "slight of hand" (it's sleight of hand) as showing that the "eye is quicker than the hand," which it is not. i am an amateur card magician and we really use redirection of attention, more commonly called misdirection.
i would have come here with my post earlier, but i was upset with buzzy's referring to something as VERY unique, when unique cannot have a modifier. something is either unique or not,. period.
plus, he refers to "slight of hand" (it's sleight of hand) as showing that the "eye is quicker than the hand," which it is not. i am an amateur card magician and we really use redirection of attention, more commonly called misdirection.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
and fighters all to often see it coming, but the reaction time just is
not there. Thats what makes fast guys like Ali so dangerous.
The punch clearly lands, it clearly cracks Liston on the jaw-side of
the face.
Liston...for whatever reason, was reluctant to get up.
Ali looks genuinely disappointed. Winning by 1 round KO is one thing,
but when theatrics occur it makes one feel robbed of training and
effort and will have people debating the fights legitimacy 40 odd years
later.
In my modest opinon their is no sleight of hand as such, just a
well timed right hand over a slow Liston jab. Perfect and cheekily
timed on Ali's behalf.
What the alterior motives were...who knows. But I doubt Ali and his
people had anything to do with it. Maybe it is a simple case of Liston
just not having the 'fight' in him for this one. Sometimes even the
strongest and bravest of us just want to sleep in too.
not there. Thats what makes fast guys like Ali so dangerous.
The punch clearly lands, it clearly cracks Liston on the jaw-side of
the face.
Liston...for whatever reason, was reluctant to get up.
Ali looks genuinely disappointed. Winning by 1 round KO is one thing,
but when theatrics occur it makes one feel robbed of training and
effort and will have people debating the fights legitimacy 40 odd years
later.
In my modest opinon their is no sleight of hand as such, just a
well timed right hand over a slow Liston jab. Perfect and cheekily
timed on Ali's behalf.
What the alterior motives were...who knows. But I doubt Ali and his
people had anything to do with it. Maybe it is a simple case of Liston
just not having the 'fight' in him for this one. Sometimes even the
strongest and bravest of us just want to sleep in too.
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2770
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
- Liston had decent hand speed. His flaw was the same in the first fight, he had great difficulty in the first few rounds establishing the correct punching distance on a retreating target.Robinson wrote: In my modest opinon their is no sleight of hand as such, just a
well timed right hand over a slow Liston jab. Perfect and cheekily
timed on Ali's behalf.
In short he was lunging in when not reaching and off balance, normally not a flaw against a fast retreating target. This being Ali, Ali spontaneously flashes his right, an off balanced arm punch. No power on the punch from either a set in the legs or a twist in the torso save Ali's snap that does snap Liston's head a bit. Just like the thousand little shots fighters routinely absorb in their careers.
As I alluded, we can never know for sure, but with Liston already off balance and looking at the canvas, it looked to be the perfect time to drop and roll. Just like Sonny's death was the perfect timing in advance of his appearance before a Congressional committee investigating boxing.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
I was never suggesting Liston was slow as such. Just that the
lunging jabs at this stage, were there to be countered by Ali's
speed.
I agree re- Liston's timing on such trying matters.
An interesting life, I just hope they don't make a mess of the
movie.
lunging jabs at this stage, were there to be countered by Ali's
speed.
I agree re- Liston's timing on such trying matters.
An interesting life, I just hope they don't make a mess of the
movie.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
I noticed both errors, but, for some reason, I was reluctant to point either out. There's often a lack of distinction between, 'your' &, 'you're' in the posts, but I guess no one's perfect.jaclem2 wrote:..boxbuzz knows a lot about boxing and i know a lot more than he does. i don't know anything about head injuries though, so i am at least willing to concede he may be right about the effects of that punch.
i would have come here with my post earlier, but i was upset with buzzy's referring to something as VERY unique, when unique cannot have a modifier. something is either unique or not,. period.
plus, he refers to "slight of hand" (it's sleight of hand) as showing that the "eye is quicker than the hand," which it is not. i am an amateur card magician and we really use redirection of attention, more commonly called misdirection.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
With Vingh Rhames in the hot seat & the film being entitled, "Phantom Punch," don't hold your breath. What a great idea --- name a fight film about a boxer after the lowest point of their career.Robinson wrote:I was never suggesting Liston was slow as such. Just that the
lunging jabs at this stage, were there to be countered by Ali's
speed.
I agree re- Liston's timing on such trying matters.
An interesting life, I just hope they don't make a mess of the
movie.
Michael Mann really dropped the ball in 2001, releasing Ali. Should have called it, Leon Spinks SD15 Muhammad Ali.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
This is exactly my opinion as well. I don't think Liston planned it especially but when on the canvas he took the easy way out. Jersey Joe made it look even worse with his botched count forcing Sonny to flop around excessively.raylawpc wrote:My personal opinion has been that the knockdown was genuine, but that the "knockout" was not.
I think Liston was the victim of a flash knockdown. That kind of knockdown can happen to anyone. For example, it happened to iron-chined Rocky Marciano against Jersey Joe Walcott in round one of their first fight - and Walcott was not known as a devastating puncher.
However, I think Liston could have gotten right back up. It anyone's guess why he chose to flop around like a fish out of water for 20 seconds before he finally getting to his feet.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
"Alright, mate.
But remember. There are legitimate reasons why Ali is seen by many knowledgable fans as the greatest heavyweight of all time. And notice I said 'greatest heavyweight'.
It's not all smoke and mirrors with a bunch of simpletons being led by the nose by a pied piper employed by the "Ali Industry" chanting mantras to The Greatest.
There is substance to the claim; and as a boxing fan you know that." - Collins
What would you say if I told you I rank Ali #1 all-time on accomplishment, & #2 all-time on who-beats-who?
But remember. There are legitimate reasons why Ali is seen by many knowledgable fans as the greatest heavyweight of all time. And notice I said 'greatest heavyweight'.
It's not all smoke and mirrors with a bunch of simpletons being led by the nose by a pied piper employed by the "Ali Industry" chanting mantras to The Greatest.
There is substance to the claim; and as a boxing fan you know that." - Collins
What would you say if I told you I rank Ali #1 all-time on accomplishment, & #2 all-time on who-beats-who?
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Goodnight, Irene wrote:I noticed both errors, but, for some reason, I was reluctant to point either out. There's often a lack of distinction between, 'your' &, 'you're' in the posts, but I guess no one's perfect.jaclem2 wrote:..boxbuzz knows a lot about boxing and i know a lot more than he does. i don't know anything about head injuries though, so i am at least willing to concede he may be right about the effects of that punch.
i would have come here with my post earlier, but i was upset with buzzy's referring to something as VERY unique, when unique cannot have a modifier. something is either unique or not,. period.
plus, he refers to "slight of hand" (it's sleight of hand) as showing that the "eye is quicker than the hand," which it is not. i am an amateur card magician and we really use redirection of attention, more commonly called misdirection.
I type in stream of consciousness mode and seldom go back and look for inevitable errors....it's a "uniquely remarkable" aspect of my nature. I hope "yo're" satisfied with my response in this matter. I may have been ever so sleightly tired at the time I offered that "particulatory" contribution.
Perhaps you know my brother and mentor..Professor Irwin Corey AKA The World's Foremost Authority.

-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
I'd say I hope the #1 ranking is only at heavyweight and not P4P.Goodnight, Irene wrote:"Alright, mate.
But remember. There are legitimate reasons why Ali is seen by many knowledgable fans as the greatest heavyweight of all time. And notice I said 'greatest heavyweight'.
It's not all smoke and mirrors with a bunch of simpletons being led by the nose by a pied piper employed by the "Ali Industry" chanting mantras to The Greatest.
There is substance to the claim; and as a boxing fan you know that." - Collins
What would you say if I told you I rank Ali #1 all-time on accomplishment, & #2 all-time on who-beats-who?
And also, Who do you have beating Ali head-to-head? I'd give a peak Brown Bomber a good chance.
Re: Head injury specialist reviews "The Phantom Punch"
Ali head to head....peak for peak ..
Holmes for me..
Tyson perhaps..
Louis good chance...
Holyfield maybe..
Lewis some days..
Frazier some days..
Norton has a good shot at it..
Patterson long shot..but could happen.
Best two to win in my books are Holmes
followed by Louis.
Holmes for me..
Tyson perhaps..
Louis good chance...
Holyfield maybe..
Lewis some days..
Frazier some days..
Norton has a good shot at it..
Patterson long shot..but could happen.
Best two to win in my books are Holmes
followed by Louis.