2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post Reply
Emaster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 471
Joined: 18 May 2008, 15:01

2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by Emaster »

This video (after 8:18) shows that Virchis was down once in round four, this video (after 1:05) that Gomez was deducted one point in round eleven.

Gomez's record
Last edited by Emaster on 13 Jan 2009, 03:36, edited 1 time in total.
Emaster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 471
Joined: 18 May 2008, 15:01

Re: 2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by Emaster »

Are the videos rejected as sources or hasn't this case been dealt with yet?
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4801
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: 2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by wouter »

:TU:
Emaster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 471
Joined: 18 May 2008, 15:01

Re: 2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by Emaster »

I thought this kind of information (knockdowns, point deductions) would be entered in BoxRec (as has been done in many cases) so that BoxRec visitors need not access the encyclopaedia just to view basic information.
Emaster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 471
Joined: 18 May 2008, 15:01

Re: 2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by Emaster »

The basic bits of information could be entered into the database as given in the initial post.
Emaster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 471
Joined: 18 May 2008, 15:01

Re: 2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by Emaster »

The knockdown and the point deduction have still not been entered into BoxRec. In my opinion, such basic information should be inserted into the database. I have a feeling, though, that BoxRec editors have generally ceased doing that. Is it due to a new policy or lack of time?
John
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9066
Joined: 08 May 2000, 20:00

Re: 2008-09-27: Juan Carlos Gomez vs. Vladimir Virchis

Post by John »

Emaster wrote:The knockdown and the point deduction have still not been entered into BoxRec. In my opinion, such basic information should be inserted into the database. I have a feeling, though, that BoxRec editors have generally ceased doing that. Is it due to a new policy or lack of time?
lack of time
Post Reply