Prizefighter...needs a re-think

THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by THEBUTCH »

Yep, I think what's been said about Gilmour "showcasing" some of his boxers came through loud and clear.

I like Gilmour, but this wasn't what Prizefighter was meant to be about. I'm just glad this was demoted to a Tuesday rather than the weekend slot.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

THEBUTCH wrote:Yep, I think what's been said about Gilmour "showcasing" some of his boxers came through loud and clear.

I like Gilmour, but this wasn't what Prizefighter was meant to be about. I'm just glad this was demoted to a Tuesday rather than the weekend slot.
I thought it odd that Barry Hearn seemed almost entirely absent from this show, I missed the first 20 minutes, but during the bit I watched, the only mug I saw was Gilmour. It was almost as if Hearn was franchising the brand to Scotland, and I noticed Gilmour was talking about the cruiserweight one as if he was involved in it.

Has Gilmour joined forces with Hearn? Does anyone know?
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by DG. »

THEBUTCH wrote: Dave Parris is a effing shit referee.

No arguments here - he takes the piss.

:D
winkveron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 08 Dec 2008, 12:31

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by winkveron »

Goz wrote:Anyone know what happens in the event of a drawn fight in Prizefighter?

I was thinking it could easily happen. Fighter A scores a knockdown in Round 1 but Fighter B wins the next 2 rounds 10-9 and voila you have your draw.

If memory serves this nearly happened in the first final between Rogan and Dolan until Dolan (who had won the 2nd after being knocked down in the opener) got hurt again in the 3rd.
Think it'd go to the person with the knockdown.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by alexpaterson »

I liked it they just need a higher quality of fighter the idea is good
housesecond
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 474
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 10:00

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by housesecond »

[quote="jamesmcdonnell"
Has Gilmour joined forces with Hearn? Does anyone know?[/quote]


They've always worked closely together. 2 of the nicer guys.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by funso banjo baby »

i said it from the beginning Prizefighter is best suited for the heavier weights...middle up.

the cruisers should be great


im there. :box:
Top Dog
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 368
Joined: 03 May 2006, 15:03

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by Top Dog »

:lol: Brawley won easily enough mate, you english guys crack me up. Surely everyone noticed the cuts where all down to dirty english fighters :shame: Especially that guy who foguht McArthur, dirty bastard, raking the cut with his glove, shocking, what a twat :shame:
Top Dog
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 368
Joined: 03 May 2006, 15:03

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by Top Dog »

housesecond wrote:[quote="jamesmcdonnell"
Has Gilmour joined forces with Hearn? Does anyone know?

They've always worked closely together. 2 of the nicer guys.[/quote]


Tommy has been involved with Hearns for years, and I agree two of the nicer guys out there
punchers chance
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 693
Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 18:37

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by punchers chance »

Goz wrote:Anyone know what happens in the event of a drawn fight in Prizefighter?

I was thinking it could easily happen. Fighter A scores a knockdown in Round 1 but Fighter B wins the next 2 rounds 10-9 and voila you have your draw.

If memory serves this nearly happened in the first final between Rogan and Dolan until Dolan (who had won the 2nd after being knocked down in the opener) got hurt again in the 3rd.
I was told that the ref would get the casting vote.

oh, and agree entirely - this latest show was awful. i'd sooner it finish now if that's the best they can put on.
chris s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 02 Jun 2004, 08:56

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by chris s »

Agree with a lot of the posts. The other night was terrible featuring four fighters with the same manager, I think (Were the Scot kids all Gilmour's fellas). Very poor quallity for live televised sport at 8pm. It needs experienced bangers who go over to work. The cruiserweight one looks good, but I still think it has it's course.
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by Adamj1987 »

it has reached the end because everyone knows how to win it now what tactics to use and usualy the most experianced amatures win becasue they are used to shorter distances and can pace tehmselves accordingly and have prob fought closer togetehr than pros with limited amature background
failedairman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 03 Mar 2009, 20:53

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by failedairman »

dont believe its reached the end just needs to look at weight divisions, punters want 3 rounds of brutal, toe to toe where one punch can finish it. SMW and above would be ideal. Would be nice if 'top-dogs' were made to compete cos Sky fees would be worth Enzo v Herbie. People said Big Brother would never last but while there are fans/Sky/advertising Prizefighter will continue
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by funso banjo baby »

Adamj1987 wrote:it has reached the end because everyone knows how to win it now what tactics to use and usualy the most experianced amatures win becasue they are used to shorter distances and can pace tehmselves accordingly and have prob fought closer togetehr than pros with limited amature background


everyone knows how to win it ???? :roll:
housesecond
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 474
Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 10:00

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by housesecond »

I didn't even know there was one on Tuesday. It's a great format that's been saturated and spoiled. Why not have one every 3-4 or even 6 months, give us something to look forward to and maintain a healthy interest.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27504
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by stujones »

housesecond wrote:I didn't even know there was one on Tuesday. It's a great format that's been saturated and spoiled. Why not have one every 3-4 or even 6 months, give us something to look forward to and maintain a healthy interest.
:TU:

Part of the appeal also of pretty much ALL the other Prizefighters is there are some "names" in it. Even if they are past it (as in Paul Samuels' case). This was like a "prospect" prizefighter, and it didn't just feel right.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Prizefighter...needs a re-think

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Top Dog wrote::lol: Brawley won easily enough mate, you english guys crack me up. Surely everyone noticed the cuts where all down to dirty english fighters :shame: Especially that guy who foguht McArthur, dirty bastard, raking the cut with his glove, shocking, what a twat :shame:
Yes that showed a truly disgraceful lack of showmanship. I was disgusted when I saw that.
Post Reply