Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Captain Hook »

Autobarn wrote:Can you be a modern great if you take 8 yrs as a title holder to stepup, look impressive for a couple of fights and then look an absolute mess v a pair of ancient legends?

I said he is REGARDED as a modern great. You can't argue with that, it's a fact.

My opinion is similar to most, he was a very good fighter who missed out on a couple of bigger fights (Ottke for example) and fought a few bums along the way.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Captain Hook »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
teddy007 wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:Lads this is not a effing video game it's boxing, and Calzaghe, whether you like him or not, is regarded as a modern great of the sport in Britain.

Hall has done eff all bar beat Pryce.

I'm not talking about boxing i'm talking about street fighting where you gauge and bite people. I know people who would anihilate Calzaghe on the street.
you asked me if I though Calzaghe would beat Hall in a street fight........are you saying you think Hall would beat him or something? :o
likewise Dioufy. No chance.
Where have you seen Hall street fighting?

And even if you have who gives a fornicate, this is a boxing forum.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Captain Hook »

PS What the fornicate are we doing talking about street fighting?!!

It's like a D-rate Vinnie Jones thread...
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by sweetscience »

how can anyone comment unless they have seen both fight in a street v someone who can fight

just cause Hall looks rough and Joe looks like businessman dont mean shit
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by n1ebf »

Captain Hook wrote:PS What the eff are we doing talking about street fighting?!!

It's like a D-rate Vinnie Jones thread...
You've made it obvious you don't like the thread don't post on it then. What the eff is hard to understand about that.

In fact eff that, as you've asked the effing question I'll effin try to effin answer it for you. I've never effing seen Matthew effin Hall in an effin street fight........does that mean I can't formulate an opinion that a bigger, faster , better chinned, fitter more skillful fighter wouldn't beat him? No, does it eff.

All this fckin bull crap people come out with about streetfighting makes me sick, you'd think anyone that's ever had a fight in a pub carpark could somehow bite, scratch, kick and gouge while Calzaghe stood there combing his hair. I've never heard such a lot of fcking shite.

By the way, you don't like our light hearted bit of fun of a thread, I don't much care for your toilet vocabulary in case you hadn't spotted it.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26446
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by banjo »

Aye it's just a bit of fun, I gave my opinion but it doesn't make it so, teddy gave his opinion and again it doesn't make it so, as they say "opinions are like arseholes, we all have one"
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26446
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by banjo »

plus the story came from the ***
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by WildWaylon »

TBH i think i would beat him in a street fight.[/quote]

who talks like that? you're a clown.[/quote]
He is a clown. Street fighters just wouldnt stand any chance, not unless they were armed with a bar. Calzaghe is just too quick and skilled for your average street fighter. I was a bouncer a good few years ago and if I was still young and fit I wouldnt want to take him on.
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by n1ebf »

WildWaylon wrote:TBH i think i would beat him in a street fight.
who talks like that? you're a clown.[/quote]
He is a clown. Street fighters just wouldnt stand any chance, not unless they were armed with a bar. Calzaghe is just too quick and skilled for your average street fighter. I was a bouncer a good few years ago and if I was still young and fit I wouldnt want to take him on.[/quote]

your average thug couldn't take Calzaghe even with a bat or a bar. I have a bit of background in Karate and if you closed the distance quickly you could negate the strike and be in a position to throw the right hand. Vice versa before someone says what if they were left handed.
The weapon would be more likely to be used against you following that.
The kind of speed you would be talking about of Calzaghe , to even a decent "street fighter" would be too much. Your teeth would be on the floor before you had chance to bite him.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Old bones Ian »

Have i stumbled onto the 'current scene' by accident?
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Captain Hook »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:PS What the eff are we doing talking about street fighting?!!

It's like a D-rate Vinnie Jones thread...
You've made it obvious you don't like the thread don't post on it then. What the eff is hard to understand about that.

In fact eff that, as you've asked the effing question I'll effin try to effin answer it for you. I've never effing seen Matthew effin Hall in an effin street fight........does that mean I can't formulate an opinion that a bigger, faster , better chinned, fitter more skillful fighter wouldn't beat him? No, does it eff.

All this fckin bull crap people come out with about streetfighting makes me sick, you'd think anyone that's ever had a fight in a pub carpark could somehow bite, scratch, kick and gouge while Calzaghe stood there combing his hair. I've never heard such a lot of fcking shite.

By the way, you don't like our light hearted bit of fun of a thread, I don't much care for your toilet vocabulary in case you hadn't spotted it.

Aww bless you sweetie have I upset your delicate sensibilities by saying fornicate once to your fifteen?!

I agreed it was stupid to discuss Calzaghe losing to Hall in any way shape or form...some people will take any opportunity to have a pop at Calzaghe and this is one of the basest arguments I've read on here.

You've just agreed with what I said earlier so why are you having a pop at me?!

They're probably right, a bloke who is willing to gouge your eyes out and bite you is probably going to win...but we'll save that for the playground. And talking about beating Calzaghe in a street fight is not something that appeals to my sense of humour.

My apologies..... :TU:

Ps Manchester United or Newcastle, make your mind up :)
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Captain Hook »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:PS What the eff are we doing talking about street fighting?!!

It's like a D-rate Vinnie Jones thread...
You've made it obvious you don't like the thread don't post on it then. What the eff is hard to understand about that.

In fact eff that, as you've asked the effing question I'll effin try to effin answer it for you. I've never effing seen Matthew effin Hall in an effin street fight........does that mean I can't formulate an opinion that a bigger, faster , better chinned, fitter more skillful fighter wouldn't beat him? No, does it eff.

All this fckin bull crap people come out with about streetfighting makes me sick, you'd think anyone that's ever had a fight in a pub carpark could somehow bite, scratch, kick and gouge while Calzaghe stood there combing his hair. I've never heard such a lot of fcking shite.

By the way, you don't like our light hearted bit of fun of a thread, I don't much care for your toilet vocabulary in case you hadn't spotted it.

Aww bless you sweetie have I upset your delicate sensibilities by saying fornicate once to your fifteen?!

I agreed it was stupid to discuss Calzaghe losing to Hall in any way shape or form...some people will take any opportunity to have a pop at Calzaghe and this is one of the basest arguments I've read on here.

You've just agreed with what I said earlier so why are you having a pop at me?!

They're probably right, a bloke who is willing to gouge your eyes out and bite you is probably going to win...but we'll save that for the playground. And talking about beating Calzaghe in a street fight is not something that appeals to my sense of humour.

My apologies..... :TU:

Ps Manchester United or Newcastle, make your mind up :)
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by n1ebf »

Captain Hook wrote:
NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:
Captain Hook wrote:PS What the eff are we doing talking about street fighting?!!

It's like a D-rate Vinnie Jones thread...
You've made it obvious you don't like the thread don't post on it then. What the eff is hard to understand about that.

In fact eff that, as you've asked the effing question I'll effin try to effin answer it for you. I've never effing seen Matthew effin Hall in an effin street fight........does that mean I can't formulate an opinion that a bigger, faster , better chinned, fitter more skillful fighter wouldn't beat him? No, does it eff.

All this fckin bull crap people come out with about streetfighting makes me sick, you'd think anyone that's ever had a fight in a pub carpark could somehow bite, scratch, kick and gouge while Calzaghe stood there combing his hair. I've never heard such a lot of fcking shite.

By the way, you don't like our light hearted bit of fun of a thread, I don't much care for your toilet vocabulary in case you hadn't spotted it.

Aww bless you sweetie have I upset your delicate sensibilities by saying eff once to your fifteen?!

I agreed it was stupid to discuss Calzaghe losing to Hall in any way shape or form...some people will take any opportunity to have a pop at Calzaghe and this is one of the basest arguments I've read on here.

You've just agreed with what I said earlier so why are you having a pop at me?!

They're probably right, a bloke who is willing to gouge your eyes out and bite you is probably going to win...but we'll save that for the playground. And talking about beating Calzaghe in a street fight is not something that appeals to my sense of humour.

My apologies..... :TU:

Ps Manchester United or Newcastle, make your mind up :)
So good you had to post it twice :lol: Amen brother :TU:
I did over-react you are quite right to show me up - my apologies :TU:
This thread is based on a supposed - well not a supposed, but an actual article from the sun apparently - now despite how I come across I have neither bothered to get off my arse and go and buy a copy, or even go to their site on this laptop right in front of me.
I am certainly not dissing Matthew Hall , who I am pleased for on what most be a fantastic recent win, and I'm not getting into some argument over boxing versus streetfighting.
All I am pointing out is that being a boxer, even an elite one doesn't preclude somebody from being able to get down and dirty in a fight, and I;m just pointing out I think Calzaghe would be a fcking nightmare to fight under any circumstances.
Maybe it's something about "busy" fighters, I always had a similar feeling about that threshing machine that is Michael Hunter who I have seen on many occasions and seen how he pummels them into submission. Just my individual opinions, relax everybody.
As for Manchester or Newcastle, well that's obvious...... :TU:
berealman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 173
Joined: 01 May 2008, 16:35

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by berealman »

Laughable, that matt hall thought he could take on Joe, I bet JC is laughing his head off.Seems
that a few of colly fighters may have very strong imaginations lol
n1ebf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4267
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 10:33

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by n1ebf »

berealman wrote:Laughable, that matt hall thought he could take on Joe, I bet JC is laughing his head off.Seems
that a few of colly fighters may have very strong imaginations lol
think you can offer someone out even though you know inside you're up against it...if someone upsets you enough and you have reason, you'd still want a go at them wouldn't you?
(this has nothing to do with this particular article that's doing the rounds, which I haven't read, must have been a very quiet newsday for them to need this :shame: )
SexySouthPaw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 27 May 2008, 15:46

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by SexySouthPaw »

Most boxers dont find on the street because they would lose their careers if they were caught out.Joe Cal would punch holes in any top street fighter.Street fights last 1-15 mins maxium,the dirty tactics dont come into because the Street fighter would never be able to get into range to do it.
Trained fighters would win everytime end of
Scrap
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1604
Joined: 29 May 2006, 05:24

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Scrap »

Enjoyed :TU:
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Who remembers Joe Savage?

He is a fellow from the black country who won 600 'streetfights' without a single defeat and he was matched up with Bert Cooper
in a pro heavyweight tourney.

Cooper hit him once and it was all over. :box:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF79w3ASXS4

If you are a world class fighter - you are a world class fighter - end of - no halfwit who runs his mouth off in a pub would take out
Calazaghe. :shame:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Autobarn »

Boxing and streetfighting plenty different. Good boxer isn't necessarily a good street fighter. Good streetfighter not necessarily good boxer. You could be very good at one and terrible at the other. In most cases boxing is more reliant on having a good plan and sticking to it perhaps over a distance. Street fighting has more to do with ending it early - hard and fast.

In a streetfight would Joe's hands hold up?

Would Joe's messy scuffling hold-and-hit attacks be suited to streetfighting? I don't know.

Who cares?
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by neil hibbert »

Autobarn wrote:Boxing and streetfighting plenty different. Good boxer isn't necessarily a good street fighter. Good streetfighter not necessarily good boxer. You could be very good at one and terrible at the other. In most cases boxing is more reliant on having a good plan and sticking to it perhaps over a distance. Street fighting has more to do with ending it early - hard and fast.

In a streetfight would Joe's hands hold up?

Would Joe's messy scuffling hold-and-hit attacks be suited to streetfighting? I don't know.

Who cares?
true, and what if they clicnh? heads and teeth come into play then haha and low blows
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Autobarn »

Light heavyweight contender Paul Briggs had some interesting comments on the difference. His dad was a local hard man, martial artist, doorman, street fighter - could make mincemeat out of ppl early on. Briggs, then a boy, saw his dad boxing on TV and couldn't believe it when his dad got broken down and (I believe) quit. Fundamentally the two are so very different.

Even normal boxing and Prize Fighter are different enough, because in PF you have to score hard and early. Classy fighter like Martin Murray is made to struggle when his opponent rushes him.
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Bomber 1 »

I can't believe I just sat and read the whole of this thread..I want the 5 mins back that this thread just took from my life... :DDD :lol: :lol: :DDD

Some funny and crazy posts..Help is needed.. :wink:
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by neil hibbert »

Bomber 1 wrote:I can't believe I just sat and read the whole of this thread..I want the 5 mins back that this thread just took from my life... :DDD :lol: :lol: :DDD

Some funny and crazy posts..Help is needed.. :wink:
mad init lad
Bomber 1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1697
Joined: 06 Jan 2009, 09:44

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by Bomber 1 »

round the bend mate..An I thought us scousers were bad... :lol: :lol:
dbf
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 28 Nov 2003, 11:06

Re: Sun newspaper: Calzaghe v Hall

Post by dbf »

Autobarn wrote:Light heavyweight contender Paul Briggs had some interesting comments on the difference. His dad was a local hard man, martial artist, doorman, street fighter - could make mincemeat out of ppl early on. Briggs, then a boy, saw his dad boxing on TV and couldn't believe it when his dad got broken down and (I believe) quit. Fundamentally the two are so very different.

Even normal boxing and Prize Fighter are different enough, because in PF you have to score hard and early. Classy fighter like Martin Murray is made to struggle when his opponent rushes him.
I think what also has to be taken into account is what shape Calzaghe is in. If he is at the beginning of his camp, his timing, accuracy and speed are not all in unison and at their peak, and therefore he would not be as effective. Not to mention his stamina.

Two completely different styles of fighting, not to forget the unpredicability a street fight can bring, use of kicks, butts, holds, throws etc.
Post Reply