Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

banjo wrote:I cannot wait for Pac to KO this Manc gobshite :box:

Careful, Diuofy is having his period.

I think Hatton wins and quite easily, only because he is so much the bigger man.


:D
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

I asked if you were a grown man, not about you.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by alexpaterson »

DG
Diofy is entitled to his opionion
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

DG, please don't PM me again.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

alexpaterson wrote:DG
Diofy is entitled to his opionion

As am I!

:D
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

With regards to Hatton, you're to a twit. One of our best fighters of the last ten years.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:DG, please don't PM me again.

Diuofy, please do not call people names and then try and come over self righteous.

The PM asked if you were on your Period, you seem very touchy.

I chose to tell you about me as you asked if I were a grown man, you have your answer ad need never ask again.

I have a right to an opinion on everything, its a free country ( board) if you do not like it then skate over it and go to the next post.

It is not hard to do.

:D
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

I seem the touchy one. I don't think I am being the self-righteous one here, do you.

* Rhetorical question, hence no question mark.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:With regards to Hatton, you're to a twit. One of our best fighters of the last ten years.

Well, my knowledge of the sport goes back over 3 decades and I can assure you Hatton flourishes due to great matchmaking and public support.

The best Light Welters/Weleter of the last 20 years would destroy him.

Destroy.

A Twit?

You won't stop, will you?

:roll:


:D
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

So Hatton isn't one of our best fighters of the last ten years?

Against Kostya, Hatton was a 5/1 underdog - I assume you bet big on Hatton as Zoo was "old and past it?"

I love wise after the event.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:I seem the touchy one. I don't think I am being the self-righteous one here, do you.

* Rhetorical question, hence no question mark.
One day I will tell you what makes a man a man!

Making comical posts on a boxing forum does not detract from my stature as a man.

Touchy? Moi? :lol:

I also out a :D Because DG is relaxed about life and knows what is important in life. Do you?


Hatton is a brawler who bullies smaller men, thats a oroiven fact, he can not compete as well when he does not have his 14lb avantage.

He has always been the heavier man on the jight, always... een at Welter, but you would not have known abpout that.

He beats Pacman because of a combination of factors.
1) Size
2) Strength
3) Pacman is not that great.


:D
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

A lot of fighters rehydrate up to, and sometimes, beyond 14lbs - I assume you don't like any of those either?

For someone who is "so relaxed and respected where it matters," you seem the need to justify yourself to me with long, monotonous and boring posts. Apart from you, and maybe Banjo, no one gives a crap.

And I don't have a life, you say?
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:So Hatton isn't one of our best fighters of the last ten years?

Against Kostya, Hatton was a 5/1 underdog - I assume you bet big on Hatton as Zoo was "old and past it?"

I love wise after the event.
We are not talking DOMESTIC here, we are talking Global.

Hatton beat an old KT and no I did not bet on it.

Put Hatton in with even a Lightweight Duran or a Pernell Whittaker or a DLH at Lt Welter or a SRL or a Mosley - Donald Curry - even Marlon Starling and see how great he is.

Put him in with the great J.C.Chavez...what happens?

Modern champions are sometimes able to match up favourably with past champions but they need to be SPECIAL..

Example? Mosley - PBF - RJJ - those guys would always do well in any era.

Hatton is not elite now and never has been.

Fact.

Prime Mosley - RJJ - Holyfield - Whittaker would excel at any time.

Real greats of the Sport.

:D
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Asterix »

DG, why do you ruin every Hatton topic? :neutral:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

Half of the rubbish you are spouting isn't anything I have ever disputed in my life, so what is your point? I agree with you on most of it, but you critiquing Hatton like you do is mostly unjustifiable. You make up hypothetical fights to tell us how awful Hatton is.

Silly sausage.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:A lot of fighters rehydrate up to, and sometimes, beyond 14lbs - I assume you don't like any of those either?

For someone who is "so relaxed and respected where it matters," you seem the need to justify yourself to me with long, monotonous and boring posts. Apart from you, and maybe Banjo, no one gives a crap.

And I don't have a life, you say?

My post was meant to show you, boy..that making comical posts is just one part of DG, it is not the whole of DG.

You are a cheeky pup, chances are I have paid more in tax than you have earnt in your life so don't begin to think for 1 second that you know me, you don't.

Is it wrong of me to 'assume' I know you? I think so.

If some think it is arrogant, then it is meant to be but only to piss YOU off, I do not discuss my life, but i thought it good to do....this once.

As the Poster goes, For one night only ( or inthis case, day)!

I will take it down bow, ou have read it and that was the purpose of doing it.

Personally I hope you have a good and full life, why wouldn't I?


:D
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:Half of the rubbish you are spouting isn't anything I have ever disputed in my life, so what is your point? I agree with you on most of it, but you critiquing Hatton like you do is mostly unjustifiable. You make up hypothetical fights to tell us how awful Hatton is.

Silly sausage.
:roll:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Asterix wrote:DG, why do you ruin every Hatton topic? :neutral:
Read the thread, I commented on something by way of a :D

It all started from there...

If people do not like something...don't comment.

:D
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

DG. wrote:
Dioufy wrote:A lot of fighters rehydrate up to, and sometimes, beyond 14lbs - I assume you don't like any of those either?

For someone who is "so relaxed and respected where it matters," you seem the need to justify yourself to me with long, monotonous and boring posts. Apart from you, and maybe Banjo, no one gives a crap.

And I don't have a life, you say?

My post was meant to show you, boy..that making comical posts is just one part of DG, it is not the whole of DG.

You are a cheeky pup, chances are I have paid more in tax than you have earnt in your life so don't begin to think for 1 second that you know me, you don't.

Is it wrong of me to 'assume' I know you? I think so.

If some think it is arrogant, then it is meant to be but only to piss YOU off, I do not discuss my life, but i thought it good to do....this once.

As the Poster goes, For one night only ( or inthis case, day)!

I will take it down bow, ou have read it and that was the purpose of doing it.

Personally I hope you have a good and full life, why wouldn't I?


:D
For someone who's life is so good, you certainly have enough time to try and contradict yourself with such useless babble.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

DG. wrote:
Dioufy wrote:Half of the rubbish you are spouting isn't anything I have ever disputed in my life, so what is your point? I agree with you on most of it, but you critiquing Hatton like you do is mostly unjustifiable. You make up hypothetical fights to tell us how awful Hatton is.

Silly sausage.
:roll:
Your constructive and mature retort has literally blown me away.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:
DG. wrote:
Dioufy wrote:A lot of fighters rehydrate up to, and sometimes, beyond 14lbs - I assume you don't like any of those either?

For someone who is "so relaxed and respected where it matters," you seem the need to justify yourself to me with long, monotonous and boring posts. Apart from you, and maybe Banjo, no one gives a crap.

And I don't have a life, you say?

My post was meant to show you, boy..that making comical posts is just one part of DG, it is not the whole of DG.

You are a cheeky pup, chances are I have paid more in tax than you have earnt in your life so don't begin to think for 1 second that you know me, you don't.

Is it wrong of me to 'assume' I know you? I think so.

If some think it is arrogant, then it is meant to be but only to piss YOU off, I do not discuss my life, but i thought it good to do....this once.

As the Poster goes, For one night only ( or inthis case, day)!

I will take it down bow, ou have read it and that was the purpose of doing it.

Personally I hope you have a good and full life, why wouldn't I?


:D
For someone who's life is so good, you certainly have enough time to try and contradict yourself with such useless babble.
Ok son, you enjoy yourself. Almost time for you tea, its your favourite!


:lol:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

I mean, what kind of reply is that - "Almost time for you tea, its your favourite?"
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

Dioufy wrote:I mean, what kind of reply is that - "Almost time for you tea, its your favourite?"
You know!


:lol:
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by Dioufy »

I don't know, hence my post. Perhaps if I decipher your grammar mistakes, then I might be more successful?
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hatton V Pacman: Mind games begin.

Post by DG. »

search wrote:Such an interesting fight. Will Hatton be able to pin Pacman down and bully him on the ropes?
Hatton will be able to do it, but if he has a ref who enforces the rules Hatton might have problems.

Tony Weeks is an ideal Hatton ref.

:D
Post Reply