The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Collins
No..rest assured as much as some posters may be intereested
in such findings...it will be anal intrusion free ;)
This is where some one now posts images of the backside of
'muscular' fighters performing calisenthics.
No..rest assured as much as some posters may be intereested
in such findings...it will be anal intrusion free ;)
This is where some one now posts images of the backside of
'muscular' fighters performing calisenthics.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Oh, I see, As soon as the magnitude of what we are undertaking is brought home you start to crumble.HomicideHenry wrote:200 variables per man?
eff that. Too much work.
You don't want to be associated with another failed tourney do you, Rufus?
Now, can you use Excel or not?
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
The list as it is, is final. Its a done deal.
Making the match-ups, is what needs to be done now.
I appoint Collins2000 to make the matches, since he's so willing to throw his opinion on the tournament. You best get cracking!
Making the match-ups, is what needs to be done now.
I appoint Collins2000 to make the matches, since he's so willing to throw his opinion on the tournament. You best get cracking!
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
No I cannot. I absoloutely hate the damn program.
Btw, if Kym has all these guys on his program anyways, why not just use what he's got on them already?
Btw, if Kym has all these guys on his program anyways, why not just use what he's got on them already?
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Do you have the authority to appoint me? I thought we were still setting up the committee???HomicideHenry wrote:The list as it is, is final. Its a done deal.
Making the match-ups, is what needs to be done now.
I appoint Collins2000 to make the matches, since he's so willing to throw his opinion on the tournament. You best get cracking!
In the meantime, email me the excel spreadsheet with the 92 men as rows and 200 columns for each row where we enter the variables.
[email protected]
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Oh you're doing the variables?
All I need to do is make a damn spread sheet?
All I need to do is make a damn spread sheet?
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
abso-fekkin-lutely, young man!HomicideHenry wrote:Oh you're doing the variables?
All I need to do is make a damn spread sheet?
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Btw, what are the 200 variables?
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
You can all laugh about 200 variables per fighter etc but this is the kind of geeky sh1t that keeps me awake at night.
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Lets get them dice out Ezzard.
I think the more 'variables' the more
accurate and interesting the simulations become.
Just defining and calibrating the variables is
the hard part.
I think the more 'variables' the more
accurate and interesting the simulations become.
Just defining and calibrating the variables is
the hard part.
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Lets get these match ups happening...
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Is the hybrid idea going to fly? Or is it a Hindenburg approach?
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
That sounds like quite a task.Robinson wrote:Lets get them dice out Ezzard.
I think the more 'variables' the more
accurate and interesting the simulations become.
Just defining and calibrating the variables is
the hard part.
Might you not be better just using he ones in Title Bout but putting our ratings to their variables? You'll never end if you offer the board up to define what variables should be taken into account and what weighting they should have.
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
I recall my grandfather having a board game, cards and dice boxing
game. I was pretty young. Its a vague memory. I wish I knew where
it is.
Buzz...
Im actually talking about abducting the fighters at their peaks and
making the matches that way. Its a complicated science but it can
be done.
game. I was pretty young. Its a vague memory. I wish I knew where
it is.
Buzz...
Im actually talking about abducting the fighters at their peaks and
making the matches that way. Its a complicated science but it can
be done.
-
BroughtonRulesRefuge
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2762
- Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
- I can see the Tyson variables- 10 ratings on power, speed, combinations, footwork, and a zer0 rating on standing up to anyone who stands up to him that sees Ruby Robert steamrollering Iron Mike in the tourney.Ezzard wrote:You'll never end if you offer the board up to define what variables should be taken into account and what weighting they should have.
I'm expecting a wealth of such gems to be found in the compressed results.
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
That is why I am not interested in variables.
I can run these so called 'simulations' so long
as people give me the comlete list and proposed
matches.
I can run these so called 'simulations' so long
as people give me the comlete list and proposed
matches.
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
I thought you'd decided that it was all down to King, Givens and prozac? Oh and a childhood that makes those born into slavery and the holocaust seem like a picnic.BroughtonRulesRefuge wrote:- I can see the Tyson variables- 10 ratings on power, speed, combinations, footwork, and a zer0 rating on standing up to anyone who stands up to him that sees Ruby Robert steamrollering Iron Mike in the tourney.Ezzard wrote:You'll never end if you offer the board up to define what variables should be taken into account and what weighting they should have.
I'm expecting a wealth of such gems to be found in the compressed results.
Seriously it would be interesting to rate the fighters in categories.
Back in the mid to late 1980s The Ring did this with all weights... From memory I think they used the following 10...
Power
Talent
Defence
Hand Speed/Co-ordination
Foot work
Heart
Chin/Survival instinct
Endurance/Durability
Historical significance/ability to transcend the sport
Quality of opposition
I don't know, something like that...
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
I'm still waiting on that spreadsheet Rufus.
:(
:(
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
You let me worry about the 200 variables.HomicideHenry wrote:Btw, what are the 200 variables?
Your job is to get the spreadsheet started with the 92 boxers as individual rows.
Email it to me when completed.
[email protected]
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
I think the public would want to know what the 200 variables are.
Murray Woroner and Hank Kaplan wrote up 129 variables back in 1967 for the NCR-315 tournaments, so my question is, if someone as intelligent as Hank Kaplan could only come up with 129 variables, then how do you and Kym come up with 200?
A list of those variables would be appreciated, imo.
Murray Woroner and Hank Kaplan wrote up 129 variables back in 1967 for the NCR-315 tournaments, so my question is, if someone as intelligent as Hank Kaplan could only come up with 129 variables, then how do you and Kym come up with 200?
A list of those variables would be appreciated, imo.
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
Have you sent me the spreadsheet yet?HomicideHenry wrote:I think the public would want to know what the 200 variables are.
Murray Woroner and Hank Kaplan wrote up 129 variables back in 1967 for the NCR-315 tournaments, so my question is, if someone as intelligent as Hank Kaplan could only come up with 129 variables, then how do you and Kym come up with 200?
A list of those variables would be appreciated, imo.
Leave 200 blank columns to the right of each of the 92 names and I will then put column heading for each of the 200 variables and post a downloadable copy on the web. Then each person can take a copy and update the variables with the values as they see fit. When everyone has entered their values for the variables we can work out an average.
How does that sound?
But I can't start until I get the spreadsheet with the 92 names, Rufus.
Send it to me now at [email protected]
Please don't post in this thread again unless it is to say the spreadsheet has been sent.
You don't seem to be taking this seriously and Kym and I are worried we might end up being associated with a bullshit tourny.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
I dont have Excel on my computer. Is there another way to do it?
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
HomicideHenry wrote:I dont have Excel on my computer. Is there another way to do it?
There is the bullshit way, Rufus.
But I thought you wanted to avoid that?
Look, I don't think you have any idea how to run a tournament as important as this.
It needs more than just childish enthusiasm.
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
HH...would you like Collins and I to decide on the
match ups ?
match ups ?
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: The ATG Heavyweight Computerized Tournament: Revisited
If the matches can be picked as randomly as possible, sure.