Eubank v Thompson
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Eubank v Thompson
Which was the fight where Eubank dropped Thompson but appeared unwilling to finish him off? Did Eubank drop him in both contests, or was it just the first one? Cannot remember which fight is which.
Anyone?
Anyone?
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Thompson went down alright, but only because he lost his footing. Anyone who doubts this watch the video. I remember it like it was yesterday:jamesmcdonnell wrote:What he faked being knocked down? I seem to recall from viewing it at the time, that Eubank lacked the killer instinct to finish him after the Watson tragedy.
Am I going mad, or are you joking?
Thompson "staggers" back into the ropes looking hurt
Eubank goes to attack him but Thompson roars back (suddenly looking fresh) and smacks him with a horrible right hand
At the same time he loses his footing somehow and goes down
The crowd screams because they just saw Thompson "looking" hurt and think he's suffered a genuine knockdown
Eubank doesn't fall for the same trick again
So many people were fooled. Boxing Monthly were fooled, they predicted Eubank would "finish off Thompson this time inside 6 rounds". While it was absolutely no surprise to me that Thompson never once wobbled in the rematch.
Those are facts gentlemen!
Re: Eubank v Thompson
Wasnt that against Collins? He stood right off in that one when he had him near finished.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Which was the fight where Eubank dropped Thompson but appeared unwilling to finish him off? Did Eubank drop him in both contests, or was it just the first one? Cannot remember which fight is which.
Anyone?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Actually I'll correct my first line - Thompson didn't "stagger" to the ropes on that occasion he just kind of "froze" and dropped his hands and lowered his head. It was all designed to get Eubank to come steaming in so that Carl could nail him with a booming right hand.
It was a rare old spectacle. On the night I actually thought the reason Eubank "chose" not to finish Thompson off was because he loved being the centre of attention so much that he didn't want the fight to end! How naive. It was only when I watched the fight the next day that I realised what was going on in there.
Remember - watch the "knockdown" and keep your eye on Thompsons body language and foot position. It's clear to see he faked everything, apart from the knockdown which was basically a slip (although Eubank did connect with a shot to add to the effect).
It was a rare old spectacle. On the night I actually thought the reason Eubank "chose" not to finish Thompson off was because he loved being the centre of attention so much that he didn't want the fight to end! How naive. It was only when I watched the fight the next day that I realised what was going on in there.
Remember - watch the "knockdown" and keep your eye on Thompsons body language and foot position. It's clear to see he faked everything, apart from the knockdown which was basically a slip (although Eubank did connect with a shot to add to the effect).
Indeed, too many jars in the interim?! I remember him nailing Collins with a massive uppercut, Collins getting up on rubbery legs and Eubank stood off. It was their first fight I think, and the eleventh round perhaps? Someone fill me in!jamesmcdonnell wrote:This is all getting confusing, memory is shite for articles when the fights are so long ago...
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
I don't remember Eubank deliberately standing off against Collins, but maybe he did.
Eubank wasn't now in either Thompson fight.
Eubank did a lot of standing off in the first Thompson fight, but that's because he was one of the few people in the arena who knew that Thompson was faking, and waiting to land a sucker punch.
Eubank wasn't now in either Thompson fight.
Eubank did a lot of standing off in the first Thompson fight, but that's because he was one of the few people in the arena who knew that Thompson was faking, and waiting to land a sucker punch.
Kilburn,
Got the fights on DVD, watch the regularly - as McGuigan said after the first fight if Thompson wasn't hurt then he deserves an Oscar. He WAS gone, he's got amazing recovery power (as shown against Rothman) but he was hurt just as badly. You cannot act the way he staggered with glazy eyes in one of those rounds. I admit the KD wasn't that much of a damaging blow.
He was also rocked in the rematch, and Eubank did try and sieze the moment - but wasn't hurt as nearly as bad.
Got the fights on DVD, watch the regularly - as McGuigan said after the first fight if Thompson wasn't hurt then he deserves an Oscar. He WAS gone, he's got amazing recovery power (as shown against Rothman) but he was hurt just as badly. You cannot act the way he staggered with glazy eyes in one of those rounds. I admit the KD wasn't that much of a damaging blow.
He was also rocked in the rematch, and Eubank did try and sieze the moment - but wasn't hurt as nearly as bad.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Thompson was faking for sure, like Kilburn says, when Eubank rushed into finish it he got chinned by a full on right hand.
Eubank defo had Collins on queer street but failed to follow up, first fight i think.
Now perhaps you guys can remind me, did Eubank have Calzaghe badly hurt right at the end of their fight??? I read it recently but couldnt remember
Eubank defo had Collins on queer street but failed to follow up, first fight i think.
Now perhaps you guys can remind me, did Eubank have Calzaghe badly hurt right at the end of their fight??? I read it recently but couldnt remember
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Yes I agree with Stu here, Thompson was definitely hurt several times ( not exactly iron chinned is he ) but he also faked it a few times too, so Eubank was probably as confused as everyone else by then.
I was watching it with a friend, who was convinced Thompson was never hurt either, but I'm pretty sure he was myself.
I was watching it with a friend, who was convinced Thompson was never hurt either, but I'm pretty sure he was myself.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13284
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Yes I think Carl is one of those fighters that can be "gone" one second, then make an immediate recovery. Chi was a bit like that the other night.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I don't know that he has great powers of recovery, more like a terrific tolerance for punishment. He seems to be able to stagger around on the verge of dropping to the canvas for entire rounds.
Charles Brewer is another.
cheers, it could have all been so different if Eubank didnt have a week to prepare and get the weight offMightyWarrior wrote:Yes, Joe was holding on for dear life near the end, more exhausted than anything I think, but Chris landed a big right hand I think.knockout wrote: Now perhaps you guys can remind me, did Eubank have Calzaghe badly hurt right at the end of their fight??? I read it recently but couldnt remember
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
-
Hardhitters11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 942
- Joined: 02 Sep 2003, 13:20
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00