Joe edged out a feeble workrate opponent.
MASSIVE ACHIEVEMENT - best Brit ever
same here but hopkins has done it his hole career,horrible & cagey but at over 40 he has to be.alexpaterson wrote:I had Joe winning by 1 point in the B-Hop and Reid fight but against Hopkins there was a bit of bias because i was getting annoyed at Hopkins antics
Barney had just been screwed over for the European Light heavyweight title.gobbles wrote:That would be four years ago when Froch was "stepping up" to face the likes of Matthew Barney, Ruben Groenwald, Damon Hague and Dale Westerman.G0mez wrote: Obviously we all have select memories and our own opinions on this. But when Froch was calling Joe out 4 years ago, he was still wrapped in cotton wool, taking rematches with guys he beat inside a round and fighting nobodies.
G0mez wrote:Barney had just been screwed over for the European Light heavyweight title.gobbles wrote:That would be four years ago when Froch was "stepping up" to face the likes of Matthew Barney, Ruben Groenwald, Damon Hague and Dale Westerman.G0mez wrote: Obviously we all have select memories and our own opinions on this. But when Froch was calling Joe out 4 years ago, he was still wrapped in cotton wool, taking rematches with guys he beat inside a round and fighting nobodies.
Froch also flew over to America to fight Librado Andrade on the Eastman v Hopkins card, but it fell through and he was given another fight by Oscar's Goldenboy - top 12 WBC ranked Henry Porras instead.
While Joe did the mario veit rematch and then 5'7 evans ashira stepped up 2 divisions.
But hey, no point trying to debate with a Warren fan is there Gobbles ?
Maybe you'd have more respect if Froch rematched Damon Hague who he smashed in a round ?
I know, it was a bit below the belt.banjo wrote:
![]()
A what?
Froch 4 years ago was fighting the likes of Matthew Barney while Joe was hyping up his Lacy fight.G0mez wrote:I disagree Tony. Obviously we all have select memories and our own opinions on this. But when Froch was calling Joe out 4 years ago, he was still wrapped in cotton wool, taking rematches with guys he beat inside a round and fighting nobodies. Wheras Hatton was a golden goose by 2005.
I think back then the fight could have come too soon for Froch, who was still green. But who'd win aside (different topic), the fact is, Calzaghe was going nowhere fast.
You could definitely make a case for witter living off Hatton's name as he struggles to draw flies unfortunately and has little support on the forums either - wheras Ricky has fought the No3 and the No1 pound for pound fighters in Kostya and Mayweather and is set to take on Pacquiao.
Who's Joe fought? a broken hand Kessler and he nearly got scalped by Hopkins. We all saw what Roy Jones had left.
If it wasn't for Hatton losing to Mayweather, thus a load of his fairweather-fans falling off the bandwagon, then climbing onto the Calzaghe bangwagon, he'd not be held in such high regard.
Its not much of a secret to see that Calzaghe was in Vegas during the Mayweather fight for his own reasons - and standing on stage with Hatton at the weigh-in did him no harm did it? a sceptic could actually see that a Hatton-loss would elevate Joe's standing in the British fight game would you not agree? afterall we all place such emphasis on being 'unbeaten' - well the armchair fan does.
I found his presence there a bit in bad taste, given the whinging he has done about Hatton beating Tszyu and leaving Warren. He poured scorn on Hatton in a BBC interview. Yet rode his coat tails.
Another factor is, Froch was calling out a fight with Joe when he was the British & Commonwealth champion - back when Calzaghe was fighting Evans Ashira (before all his 'names' at the end of his career).
He wanted to expose Joe for the Wazza-backed cherry-picker he was. As it is, he managed to salvage his reputation by beating Lacy in style. That performance over a (what everyone completely agrees now) mediocre fighter gave Calzaghe a huge boost both personally and professionally and inspired him to take on bigger fights.
If Hatton had not trail blazed his way from Wazza and gone over to the States to fight all round Vegas, then i dont think Joe would have either.
The fact which everyone overlooks is that, who'd Calzaghe be without Hatton's name and profile ?
That my friends is the true question here.
Ashira was crap and it went twelve rounds. A light middle who was 5'7 and had already been knocked out in two rounds before getting in with Joe.Max Molyneux wrote:
Froch 4 years ago was fighting the likes of Matthew Barney while Joe was hyping up his Lacy fight.![]()
Funn how you say mediocre yet your boy Froch picked him to KO Joe and bought into the hype when he was interviewed in a 2005 boxing monthly.![]()
Evans Ashira wasn't that good but no one was hyping him up, he was just there to give Joe some activity. Froch only just got off the Barney fight and wouldn't of been ready anyway. Plus Froch was offered a fight with Joe and turned it down because he;s brainwashed by Hennessey's talk. Hennessey thought he could pay Joe 5 mill to fight Carl. Ashira was crap i agree but Froch wouldn't of won either anyway and was happy to win his lonsdale outright at the time.
That's just not true about Andrade. He was supposed to face a guy called Christian Cruz. Check it out, if you don't believe me. Cruz never turned up for the weigh-in.G0mez wrote:Barney had just been screwed over for the European Light heavyweight title.gobbles wrote:That would be four years ago when Froch was "stepping up" to face the likes of Matthew Barney, Ruben Groenwald, Damon Hague and Dale Westerman.G0mez wrote: Obviously we all have select memories and our own opinions on this. But when Froch was calling Joe out 4 years ago, he was still wrapped in cotton wool, taking rematches with guys he beat inside a round and fighting nobodies.
Froch also flew over to America to fight Librado Andrade on the Eastman v Hopkins card, but it fell through and he was given another fight by Oscar's Goldenboy - top 12 WBC ranked Henry Porras instead.
While Joe did the mario veit rematch and then 5'7 evans ashira stepped up 2 divisions.
But hey, no point trying to debate with a Warren fan is there Gobbles ?
Maybe you'd have more respect if Froch rematched Damon Hague who he smashed in a round ?
hurlock wrote:im not a jc hater,but gomez & observer are laying down pure facts.jc had heart, great work rate,good chin & stamina..BUT was untested had it been in howard winstone's day when there could be only 1 world champion jc wouldnt have a strap.
if colin jones had a wbo title bveing fed journeymen & washed up yanks he'd been a reighning champ.
jc blows his own trumpet,wc for 10 yrs...25 defences undefeated![]()
tell me what his opponents went on to do,only bika i think done ok.
as for,jiminez,pudwill,mchirtan,ashira,sobot,thornberry,guy's that wouldnt win an area title :!: hardly all comers is it.
fwank didnt make millions from calzaghe until he pitched him in with lacy,once hatton had left they really got behind jc in promoting him,this was a guy who was looking to share hattons bill,who couldnt sell out cardiff castle which is smaller then york hall,now all this best brit ever bs he aint even the best welsh fighter imo,all this bs how we dont like a winner :!: dont like frauds