Nah, let's have it in the open so we can all have a laugh.ERIC GUY wrote:I dont get that?? what do you mean? you can pm me if you likeMY point is, Eric, if you had even the slightest semblance of boxing awareness (stick to your anyone-can-hold-it camera),
Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
-
Collins2000
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4175
- Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
I bit there, Eric, because I thought my point about the 1980s heavies winning fights on sheer brute strength as opposed to any real boxing skill (as they do in every other weight) was fairly obvious. Look at the work ethic of Marvin Hagler round that same time!ERIC GUY wrote:I dont get that?? what do you mean? you can pm me if you likeMY point is, Eric, if you had even the slightest semblance of boxing awareness (stick to your anyone-can-hold-it camera),
I understand that you get around and the know the boxing game inside out. Boxing is all about making money. We both know that.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
I think Terry D should wade in with a bit of Dokes-love at this point
Back to the original point... why is this Rafferty-Witherspoon fight being repeatedly referred to as an exhibition? The EBF is unlicensed but it's always full-contact, as far as I know. If it was an exhibition, then why was there a points decision?
Back to the original point... why is this Rafferty-Witherspoon fight being repeatedly referred to as an exhibition? The EBF is unlicensed but it's always full-contact, as far as I know. If it was an exhibition, then why was there a points decision?
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
Whats that got to do with my camera??1 bit there, Eric, because I thought my point about the 1980s heavies winning fights on sheer brute strength as opposed to any real boxing skill (as they do in every other weight) was fairly obvious. Look at the work ethic of Marvin Hagler round that same time!
I understand that you get around and the know the boxing game inside out. Boxing is all about making money. We both know that.
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
I've tried apologising but you don't want to know so fornicate off.ERIC GUY wrote:Whats that got to do with my camera??1 bit there, Eric, because I thought my point about the 1980s heavies winning fights on sheer brute strength as opposed to any real boxing skill (as they do in every other weight) was fairly obvious. Look at the work ethic of Marvin Hagler round that same time!
I understand that you get around and the know the boxing game inside out. Boxing is all about making money. We both know that.
-
mark thompson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 662
- Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
Whats gone on in this thread ???
Bennie always comes across as very knowledgeable to me with some very good posts, but he seems to have lost it here
Bennie always comes across as very knowledgeable to me with some very good posts, but he seems to have lost it here
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
Lol that apology makes Gordon Brown look completely contrite!
-
mark thompson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 662
- Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 05:13
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
Coco wrote:Lol that apology makes Gordon Brown look completely contrite!
That was a great apology
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
where have you apolagised, and dont be so rude,I've tried apologising but you don't want to know so eff off.
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
Sorry and sorry.
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
ERIC GUY wrote:where have you apolagised, and dont be so rude,I've tried apologising but you don't want to know so eff off.
What is it with people, so what is someone tells them to Eff off, calls them a w*nker, C8nt or anyother derogartory word, why do people get so offended. Is it just a way of getting people banned?
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
apology not accepted,
Re: Tim Witherspoon v Nigel Rafferty
thread locked - move on