Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by twenty six »

See the post under Small v Hall.
On a different subject, whilst the purse is attractive for Appleby, 72k is wide of the mark.
Steve - I'll be there mate.
Counter - thanks for the comments mate.
I do have to work for a living and do not have to hang on to every whisper of dogbreath.
:TU:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Counter-puncher »

steve689 wrote:Brave call Bennie. I'm slightly swinging towards Appleby but it's a real 50/50 affair.

Come on then - who's going?? :box:
home advantage tipping it, that's what started to make me lean towards lindsay too
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by beagleboy »

Counter-puncher wrote:
beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.


Maybe she's caught a cold. :geek:
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?

I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'

just a thought for you to ponder.
She was just too quiet after that mysterious pull-out, it was obvious something was going on you self-righteous fool.

:geek:
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by beagleboy »

Gazmac81 wrote:Is Rhodes And Small still on for a later Date
Something isnt right here
Counter-puncher wrote:
beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.


Maybe she's caught a cold. :geek:
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?

I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'

just a thought for you to ponder.
Gazmac could see it :o Stevie Wonder could see it :o
Looked like somebody missed those counter-punching openings :shame:
beagleboy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 25 Apr 2006, 14:31

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by beagleboy »

Rhodes is now lined up to box a Hungarian who got KOd by Colin Lynes. :o :geek:
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by sweetscience »

why are they paying Appleby £72k, thats just madness

this show is obviously going to run at a loss, surely ??
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

Preview up soon on BBN.

Rhodes is in with Janos Petrovics.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 668
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by whatashambles »

Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Counter-puncher »

beagleboy wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
beagleboy wrote:I've never known her so quiet.


Maybe she's caught a cold. :geek:
here's a thought mate: maybe he's got other things to do than going on the internet to 'banter' with the likes of you?

I mean, maybe, just maybe, at every single piece of boxing news related to Ryan Rhodes, he actually doesn't immediately think 'Christ i'd better get on boxrec and defend Ryan, otherwise heaven help him, for surely that beagleboy will run amok with Ryan's reputation in my critical absence'

just a thought for you to ponder.
She was just too quiet after that mysterious pull-out, it was obvious something was going on you self-righteous fool.

:geek:
my comment was nowt to do with whether or not something 'fishy' was going on with Rhodes-Small, i have no vested interest one way or another in that, as you seem to do.

it was to do with the fact that your snidey stalking following of 26 makes you look like a pathetic little kid, and the fact that you mistakenly seem to think your comments must always merit a reply from 26, and if he's not replying, well he must be running and hiding from your sad insinuations.

I was saying the fact he hasn't replied, maybe that means he has a life. get one yourself.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by twenty six »

I feel like I'm being stalked mate.
Which pervert would want to stalk an over 50 has been ?
He's got an agenda - simple as.
Sad thing is you know, I reckon he knows his stuff on boxing generally :wink: - just wish he'd post on another theme every now and then.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

http://www.britishboxing.net/news_4540- ... ndsay.html

Cracking football style atmosphere at the weigh-in just now. I didn't get any video footage but had the trusty dictaphone with me so should put up a bit of audio later if I remember. :TU:
Ted
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 03:39

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Ted »

steve689 wrote:http://www.britishboxing.net/news_4540- ... ndsay.html

I didn't get any video footage but had the trusty dictaphone :TU:
Should you not have used you finger its more hygienic. :-?
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by steve689 »

eh?
Ted
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 381
Joined: 24 Aug 2007, 03:39

Re: Appleby vs Lindsay undercard

Post by Ted »

steve689 wrote:eh?
dict -ta - phone....

y'know

dick to phone?

You can tell its a friday afternoon
Post Reply