so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by adamheight »

even though its irrelevant now coz mundine is at MW
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Brute »

adamheight wrote:even though its irrelevant now coz mundine is at MW
I somehow doubt that Anthony would match Froch's mental toughness. To pull a win out of that situation took a heart bigger than Choc's.
Hounddawg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4035
Joined: 26 Feb 2008, 07:50

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Hounddawg »

adamheight wrote:even though its irrelevant now coz mundine is at MW
He still is very beatable, great heart, good win, but i would never place a bet on Froch.

Who said Mundine would beat Froch?
popeye1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 118
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 04:13

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by popeye1 »

Brute wrote:
adamheight wrote:even though its irrelevant now coz mundine is at MW
I somehow doubt that Anthony would match Froch's mental toughness. To pull a win out of that situation took a heart bigger than Choc's.
you would be a good judge of cowardice brutus....youve been one all your life.. :TU:
Liver Crusher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 21:09

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Liver Crusher »

who cares about Mundine now..his next fight will be his last.He will be announcing his retirement a week after he loses to Geale.

Mundine will sleep tight about rd 7 on may 27th.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Brute »

popeye1 wrote:
Brute wrote:
adamheight wrote:even though its irrelevant now coz mundine is at MW
I somehow doubt that Anthony would match Froch's mental toughness. To pull a win out of that situation took a heart bigger than Choc's.
you would be a good judge of cowardice brutus....youve been one all your life.. :TU:
Saying that someone is not as mentally strong as someone else is not saying he is a coward. If Mundine was a coward he would never have got in the ring.

If you knew anything of my life and career you would never have made that statement.
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Marlin »

These are two blokes I will never watch fight...
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by adamheight »

Marlin wrote:These are two blokes I will never watch fight...
?! wtf? froch is one of the most exciting SMW's since the days of nigel benn and chris eubank
dan h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 728
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 04:49

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by dan h »

Yes choc would still beat him. Froch is terrible technically. He has great toughness and determination but choc would not be as dumb as taylor to engage with froch so much. Taylor had that fight last night and froch pulled it out with his toughness because taylor gassed. Choc wouldn't be so silly. Froch is overrated imo and will get dominated by Kessler if they ever fight
dan h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 728
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 04:49

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by dan h »

Doule post
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by adamheight »

dan h wrote:Yes choc would still beat him. Froch is terrible technically. He has great toughness and determination but choc would not be as dumb as taylor to engage with froch so much. Taylor had that fight last night and froch pulled it out with his toughness because taylor gassed. Choc wouldn't be so silly. Froch is overrated imo and will get dominated by Kessler if they ever fight
mundine has no power or chin, the chance of him ko'ing froch are slim and the chances of him eating carls leather for 12 rounds are slimmer
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Marlin »

Mundine doesn't eat a lot of leather, he uses speed and agility to try and outbox opponents while deparately avoiding getting hit. Taylor and Mundine are very different, Mundine does not stand and trade for anything.
toppity
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2802
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 22:03

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by toppity »

Marlin wrote:These are two blokes I will never watch fight...
who...Brute v Popeye1
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by adamheight »

Marlin wrote:Mundine doesn't eat a lot of leather, he uses speed and agility to try and outbox opponents while deparately avoiding getting hit. Taylor and Mundine are very different, Mundine does not stand and trade for anything.
Hence one judge had him losing every round against kessler
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Marlin »

adamheight wrote:
Marlin wrote:Mundine doesn't eat a lot of leather, he uses speed and agility to try and outbox opponents while deparately avoiding getting hit. Taylor and Mundine are very different, Mundine does not stand and trade for anything.
Hence one judge had him losing every round against kessler
That is still not a knockout, it went the distance and Mundine did not stand and trade. You said the chances of him going 12 full rounds with Froch are very slim. I don't see how the Kessler fight helps your arguement...
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by adamheight »

Marlin wrote:
adamheight wrote:
Marlin wrote:Mundine doesn't eat a lot of leather, he uses speed and agility to try and outbox opponents while deparately avoiding getting hit. Taylor and Mundine are very different, Mundine does not stand and trade for anything.
Hence one judge had him losing every round against kessler
That is still not a knockout, it went the distance and Mundine did not stand and trade. You said the chances of him going 12 full rounds with Froch are very slim. I don't see how the Kessler fight helps your arguement...
how can u even assess mundine? look at his quality of opposition lately? he fights bums. carl froch isnt a bum, mundine can run and hide all night against cabbies, froch will hunt him down and mundine wont really get a choice about trading. he would have to
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Sweet P »

Id say Froch might beat Mundine. Then again Taylor was easily outboxing him when he let his hands go. Id say Mundine would drop a UD. Froch isnt exactly Eubank or Benn, Adam. your talking him up abit mate :wink:
In a lot of the rounds Taylor was outboxing him fairly easily. If it wasn't for the stoppage Taylor would have won a UD.
Liver Crusher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 21:09

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Liver Crusher »

He'll be eating some leather late may Ill give ya the tip! :box: :box: :box: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
toppity
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2802
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 22:03

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by toppity »

Geale will not KO mundine :geek2:
Liver Crusher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 03 Aug 2008, 21:09

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Liver Crusher »

Hey Toppers,

Everyone knows choc has a glass chin right?? dropped by crazy kim.

Geale is hundred times quicker than those guys who have put him on his ass.He hit Dawson with some strong punches but Dawson is a "rock".If Geale gets one of those on him...its Good nite.

Geale is quicker than mundine. :bow:
Sweet P
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3669
Joined: 23 Mar 2003, 04:18

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Sweet P »

Liver Crusher wrote:Hey Toppers,

Everyone knows choc has a glass chin right?? dropped by crazy kim.

Geale is hundred times quicker than those guys who have put him on his ass.He hit Dawson with some strong punches but Dawson is a "rock".If Geale gets one of those on him...its Good nite.

Geale is quicker than mundine. :bow:
Geales hands arn't quicker than Mundine (but there still quick). His boxing ability and footwork is probably better. Power there fairly even.
I think its 50/50. Geale is a really talented fighter and had a great amature career. He has a good boxing brain and if this fight goes 12 he might suprise a few people IMO.
adamheight
Editor
Editor
Posts: 1734
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 02:28

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by adamheight »

If you knew anything of my life and career you would never have made that statement.
were u a pro boxer or something?
brocko
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 18:39

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by brocko »

Geale will get bashed by mundine.I dont rate Geale that highly.I hope im wrong.
dan h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 728
Joined: 19 Jan 2008, 04:49

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by dan h »

I think Choc will beat Geale, but geale is definitely world class.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: so u guys still think mundine would beat froch?

Post by Brute »

toppity wrote:
Marlin wrote:These are two blokes I will never watch fight...
who...Brute v Popeye1
Who would watch a man in his 60s fight? :lol:
Post Reply