Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by DG. »

oliverfennell wrote:
Spud wrote:Wouldn't it be great - Witter v Khan!!!

If that fight came off and Witter won - he would be my best friend and favourite fighter - I f*cking cannot stand Khan!!!
Why?

If he gets a job with Team Khan then Khan will be the new SRL!


:D
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26341
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by banjo »

How anyone can claim that the WBC belt means more than the WBO now is beyond me, all of these organisations are ridiculous, the WBA with their interim/ordinary/super/super dooper championships, the IBF with whom it's almost impossible to make a defence of the title because they try and take it from you as soon as you've won it and the WBC which is easily the most corrupt of all of them.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Fantastic news for Junior Witter!!!

Post by big lennox »

Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Fantastic news for Junior Witter!!!

Post by Adamj1987 »

well the only thing new there is that witter is fighting for full title now
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Fantastic news for Junior Witter!!!

Post by big lennox »

And that is great news!! He can be two time champion of the world. Ecellent opportunity for him.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Fantastic news for Junior Witter!!!

Post by Autobarn »

Good that he's got a way back.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Fantastic news for Junior Witter!!!

Post by Captain Hook »

This is the last chance saloon...let's hope he can pull it off.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by DG. »

He needs a few outings to get ready, maybe some gym fights, inactivity is gonna get him.

If he wins and fights Khan then he can fight hatton after he stops Khan in 2 rounds.

Whoops, I forgot Kotelnik is gonna beat Khan.

Hatton/Khan/Witter!

Do it for british Boxing and then Witter can knock you both out!

:D
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by DG. »

Witter will need a jab against Alexander.

Witter needs to get back to Boxing.

:TU:
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

DG. wrote:Witter will need a jab against Alexander.

Witter needs to get back to Boxing.

:TU:
Witter's jabs poor though, very telegraphed
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by gobbles »

So let's get this correct for people on here who just slag off the WBO.

Bradley dropped the WBC title to hold on to the WBO one. Right?
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6148
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

further proof how diluted the sanctioning bodies have become.

give the man some time to fight his mandatory. :roll:

instead of that they've given him an ultimatum and strip him straight away.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2697
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by Flump »

gobbles wrote:So let's get this correct for people on here who just slag off the WBO.

Bradley dropped the WBC title to hold on to the WBO one. Right?
And if they stopped rating Gary Lockett, Amir Khan and Kevin Mitchell as number 1 contenders they'd get slagged off even less.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by stujones »

gobbles wrote:So let's get this correct for people on here who just slag off the WBO.

Bradley dropped the WBC title to hold on to the WBO one. Right?
Well I guess Peterson is worth more money than Witter/Alexander also.
finchy36
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 87
Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 15:27

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by finchy36 »

Witter was blessed with a lot of talent but am I the only one that thinks he has always under achieved? I just feel he could have been so much better. Be good to see him win another 'world' title but I fear he will never get the true recognition from fight fans.

Has any FW fighter held the WBC belt? I thought he had an exclusive deal with WBO :lol:

I agree with banjo, the belt situ is becoming embarrassing. The WBA should be outlawed. Imagine this - you sacrfice plenty in your life, work and train hard, fight some tough guys, work your way to the top and finally get a title shot. You beat the 'champion of the world' and you can then call yourself - wait for it - the 'Ordinary Champion' WTF?!!

Anyway, good luck to Junior
:box:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by DG. »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
DG. wrote:Witter will need a jab against Alexander.

Witter needs to get back to Boxing.

:TU:
Witter's jabs poor though, very telegraphed

Not when he uses it properly, plus it is better than waving it in front of people like wand!

:D
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by Counter-puncher »

steve689 wrote:Hopefully McCloskey will get a crack at the vacant European belt now then against another highly rated challenger, with O'Donnell-Haughian on the undercard.

As for Witter, I think his time has come and gone. He has a puncher's chance but if he has to travel to America to tackle a hungry, fresher, unbeaten fighter then I think he wil struggle.
is Haughian - JOD on the cards then/ confirmed or near-confirmed, mate?

I think JOD stands him on his head he's a bit too flatfooted to deal with JOD, IMO
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27450
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by stujones »

finchy36 wrote:Witter was blessed with a lot of talent but am I the only one that thinks he has always under achieved? I just feel he could have been so much better. Be good to see him win another 'world' title but I fear he will never get the true recognition from fight fans.

Has any FW fighter held the WBC belt? I thought he had an exclusive deal with WBO :lol:

I agree with banjo, the belt situ is becoming embarrassing. The WBA should be outlawed. Imagine this - you sacrfice plenty in your life, work and train hard, fight some tough guys, work your way to the top and finally get a title shot. You beat the 'champion of the world' and you can then call yourself - wait for it - the 'Ordinary Champion' WTF?!!

Anyway, good luck to Junior
:box:
Only according to boxrec I believe. Again, I appologise if this is a WBA thing.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by oliverfennell »

stujones wrote:
finchy36 wrote:Witter was blessed with a lot of talent but am I the only one that thinks he has always under achieved? I just feel he could have been so much better. Be good to see him win another 'world' title but I fear he will never get the true recognition from fight fans.

Has any FW fighter held the WBC belt? I thought he had an exclusive deal with WBO :lol:

I agree with banjo, the belt situ is becoming embarrassing. The WBA should be outlawed. Imagine this - you sacrfice plenty in your life, work and train hard, fight some tough guys, work your way to the top and finally get a title shot. You beat the 'champion of the world' and you can then call yourself - wait for it - the 'Ordinary Champion' WTF?!!

Anyway, good luck to Junior
:box:
Only according to boxrec I believe. Again, I appologise if this is a WBA thing.
yes, BoxRec have done this to differentiate from the "Super" champs. I think that's fair enough in the divisions that have dual (or triple!) champs, for example Caballero/Dunne, but it's unfair on the legit WBA champs such as
Kotelnik. It's especially unfair on legit WBA champs of the past who won the belt before the splintering happened (when the WBA was still a top title). Apparently Muhammad Ali was an "ordinary" champion...
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by Max Molyneux »

Hope Witter wins his belt back being a fan but hopefully he doesn't lose hunger this time and lose it again.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26341
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by banjo »

oliverfennell wrote:
stujones wrote:
finchy36 wrote:Witter was blessed with a lot of talent but am I the only one that thinks he has always under achieved? I just feel he could have been so much better. Be good to see him win another 'world' title but I fear he will never get the true recognition from fight fans.

Has any FW fighter held the WBC belt? I thought he had an exclusive deal with WBO :lol:

I agree with banjo, the belt situ is becoming embarrassing. The WBA should be outlawed. Imagine this - you sacrfice plenty in your life, work and train hard, fight some tough guys, work your way to the top and finally get a title shot. You beat the 'champion of the world' and you can then call yourself - wait for it - the 'Ordinary Champion' WTF?!!

Anyway, good luck to Junior
:box:
Only according to boxrec I believe. Again, I appologise if this is a WBA thing.
yes, BoxRec have done this to differentiate from the "Super" champs. I think that's fair enough in the divisions that have dual (or triple!) champs, for example Caballero/Dunne, but it's unfair on the legit WBA champs such as
Kotelnik. It's especially unfair on legit WBA champs of the past who won the belt before the splintering happened (when the WBA was still a top title). Apparently Muhammad Ali was an "ordinary" champion...
It's changed now anyway BoxRec now lists it as "WBA World title"
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Bradley stripped of WBC LW belt

Post by oliverfennell »

banjo wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:yes, BoxRec have done this to differentiate from the "Super" champs. I think that's fair enough in the divisions that have dual (or triple!) champs, for example Caballero/Dunne, but it's unfair on the legit WBA champs such as
Kotelnik. It's especially unfair on legit WBA champs of the past who won the belt before the splintering happened (when the WBA was still a top title). Apparently Muhammad Ali was an "ordinary" champion...
It's changed now anyway BoxRec now lists it as "WBA World title"
Good!
Post Reply