Macklin on the Khan undercard
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Macklin on the Khan undercard
anyone have a clue who he will be fighting?
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
I hope its a decent, meaningful fight (e.g. 1st defence of the British title) as opposed to a no-mark 10 rounder against some unknown tomato can from armenia. Macklin's been treading water for too long prior to the Elcock win and deserves to be moved along at a decent rate from now on.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
He was talking about Bendall in a voluntary with the winner of Barker v McDermott to follow.
That would do for me
That would do for me
-
black panther
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4097
- Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
Bendall would be a decent enough fight and Bendall is deserving of a shot, having beaten Paul Smith. That said, I'd be surprised if Macklin didn't take care of him inside six rounds, eight at a push. I really rate Macklin. I remember when he first turned pro he looked like one of the best prospects we've had in a while but then really underperformed in the Facey fight (mind you Facey has terribly awkward style to fight, is a tough SOB and can make anyone look bad - ain't that righy Moorsey?
). The Moore fight set him back a bit of course, but I really believe he is good enough to fight for a world title. And with Abraham and Pavlik looking to move up to 168lbs sooner rather than later, its not inconceivable that he could big up a belt.
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
Yeah, id definitely take a Macklin v Bendall fight.
Bendall has been around the domestic block in the last few years and would be a very solid fight for Macklin. Though as mentioned, I think Macklin would have too much for Bendall and the fight would be unlikely to go past 6 rounds.
Bendall has been around the domestic block in the last few years and would be a very solid fight for Macklin. Though as mentioned, I think Macklin would have too much for Bendall and the fight would be unlikely to go past 6 rounds.
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
sounds like an ugly fight
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
Yes, a boxer who has just lost the English title- and IDEAL and totally logical candidate to challenge for the British title.
I'm not knocking Bendall, just this silly system of "titles."
I'm not knocking Bendall, just this silly system of "titles."
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
unusual i disagree with you terry but it wouldn't do for me, not at all reallyTerribleTerry wrote:He was talking about Bendall in a voluntary with the winner of Barker v McDermott to follow.
That would do for me
i don't see (1) what on earth Bendall losing to my man Macca has done to earn him a shot and (2) how, given that Elcock smashed him to bits and an extremely ringrusty Macca handled him with relative ease, Bendall could go more than 5-6 VERY one-sided rounds with Matthew IMO>
tho having said that off the top of my head I am at a loss for suitable alternatives so i had best shut up
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
bump- terry, any suggestions for an alternative to Bendall (who, the more i think about it, the less satisfied i am with)? i heard something to the effect that macklin wants to better his ranking, tho with what organisation I don't know...
Euro ranking?
Euro ranking?
-
Jeff Thomas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
What about Facey in a non title match up.... Clean up the slate.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
heh, i feel like i should object to that fight more than bendall but i don't
i guess i am viewing this as more a keep-busy fight as macklin waits forBarker and Macca to decide who's up next for him
i guess i am viewing this as more a keep-busy fight as macklin waits forBarker and Macca to decide who's up next for him
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
Another name in the mix was ex-amateur star Matthew Thirwall but he has never really moved out of 6 round class in a start stop career.
I prefer Bendall due to the derby factor (Cov being only 10 miles or so from Solihull) and the fact that he has a fairly recent points win over Paul Smith.
In an ideal world, to my mind, Macklin would be facing Macca in a voluntary derby defence and then Barker in a mandatory but as they are now boxing off for the right to face Macklin the Bendall fight is a decent enough voluntary, to me.
I prefer Bendall due to the derby factor (Cov being only 10 miles or so from Solihull) and the fact that he has a fairly recent points win over Paul Smith.
In an ideal world, to my mind, Macklin would be facing Macca in a voluntary derby defence and then Barker in a mandatory but as they are now boxing off for the right to face Macklin the Bendall fight is a decent enough voluntary, to me.
-
Jeff Thomas
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3016
- Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32
Re: Macklin on the Khan undercard
Thirwall was a real banger in the ams suprised its not really happened for him in the pros. That could be a tough one- or it could be easy... But I doubt he'll emerge with much credit either way.TerribleTerry wrote:Another name in the mix was ex-amateur star Matthew Thirwall but he has never really moved out of 6 round class in a start stop career.
I prefer Bendall due to the derby factor (Cov being only 10 miles or so from Solihull) and the fact that he has a fairly recent points win over Paul Smith.
In an ideal world, to my mind, Macklin would be facing Macca in a voluntary derby defence and then Barker in a mandatory but as they are now boxing off for the right to face Macklin the Bendall fight is a decent enough voluntary, to me.