Some more info. here: http://www.BS.com/forums/showt ... hp?t=32365TerribleTerry wrote:Khalid ShafiqOld bones Ian wrote:Who was that lad that Brendan Ingle was going on about 'better than Naz'
If i remember the lad had 1 fight , in South Africa for some reason, looked awful and scrapped a draw.
Last i heard he was inside for being a nasty piece of work
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... cat=boxer1
He wanted to be a gangster, not a boxer
What fighters never achieved their big talk
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
-
landon
- Heavyweight
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
i remember reading something about that, brendan saying he would be better than naz and the next big thing, funny enough i was asking someone about it not so long ago and was told it would of been kell brook. you hear stuff like that all the time off the ingles !
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
Yeah thanks Terry and Asterix , was driving me mad.
-
FLINT ISLAND
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
yes
in regard to the previous posts I am glad you brought the subject up regarding the Brendan Ingle proteges
When I was growing up as a teenager in the 1990's I was all into Naz and read all the books
I always wondered what had happened to them kids tipped to be "even better than Naz"
the thing is with prospects like that - there are probaly loads of them over the years who never came to nothing
there probaly are loads of young kids just as talented as Naz
but the likes of Naz are one in a million becauze someone like Naz didnt just have the talent - he had the confidence - belief - focus - dedication - sacarfice - etc etc
I think being a Muslim helped Naz live a clean life and stay on the clean path as a young man
when a young kid turns to boxing - he may have bags of talent - but as he gets older and develops into a young man - other thing become more important - like - boozing - smoking - drugs - girls - clubbing - lads holidays - etc etc
dendicating your life to boxing aint so important then
being talented is nothing really - everyone has some degree of talent
but only a very few truely go on and commit their lifes to be as a successful a boxer as Prince Naseem Hamed
in regard to the previous posts I am glad you brought the subject up regarding the Brendan Ingle proteges
When I was growing up as a teenager in the 1990's I was all into Naz and read all the books
I always wondered what had happened to them kids tipped to be "even better than Naz"
the thing is with prospects like that - there are probaly loads of them over the years who never came to nothing
there probaly are loads of young kids just as talented as Naz
but the likes of Naz are one in a million becauze someone like Naz didnt just have the talent - he had the confidence - belief - focus - dedication - sacarfice - etc etc
I think being a Muslim helped Naz live a clean life and stay on the clean path as a young man
when a young kid turns to boxing - he may have bags of talent - but as he gets older and develops into a young man - other thing become more important - like - boozing - smoking - drugs - girls - clubbing - lads holidays - etc etc
dendicating your life to boxing aint so important then
being talented is nothing really - everyone has some degree of talent
but only a very few truely go on and commit their lifes to be as a successful a boxer as Prince Naseem Hamed
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
when he was a talented heavyweight prospect that isFLINT ISLAND wrote:Matthew Ellis was hyped to be the first billion dollar athelte in history of sport
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
kell brook perhaps is one of those tipped when he was a kid to be as good as naz. he is very promising though the opponents haven't been up to much of recentFLINT ISLAND wrote:yes
in regard to the previous posts I am glad you brought the subject up regarding the Brendan Ingle proteges
When I was growing up as a teenager in the 1990's I was all into Naz and read all the books
I always wondered what had happened to them kids tipped to be "even better than Naz"
the thing is with prospects like that - there are probaly loads of them over the years who never came to nothing
there probaly are loads of young kids just as talented as Naz
but the likes of Naz are one in a million becauze someone like Naz didnt just have the talent - he had the confidence - belief - focus - dedication - sacarfice - etc etc
I think being a Muslim helped Naz live a clean life and stay on the clean path as a young man
when a young kid turns to boxing - he may have bags of talent - but as he gets older and develops into a young man - other thing become more important - like - boozing - smoking - drugs - girls - clubbing - lads holidays - etc etc
dendicating your life to boxing aint so important then
being talented is nothing really - everyone has some degree of talent
but only a very few truely go on and commit their lifes to be as a successful a boxer as Prince Naseem Hamed
-
DG.
- Heavyweight
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
landon wrote:i remember reading something about that, brendan saying he would be better than naz and the next big thing, funny enough i was asking someone about it not so long ago and was told it would of been kell brook. you hear stuff like that all the time off the ingles !
He is a prick.
Last edited by DG. on 02 May 2009, 18:32, edited 1 time in total.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight
Re: What fighters never achieved their big talk
landon wrote:i remember reading something about that, brendan saying he would be better than naz and the next big thing, funny enough i was asking someone about it not so long ago and was told it would of been kell brook. you hear stuff like that all the time off the ingles !
He is a total arse from what I have heard.
