Froch is a class act

teddy007
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1302
Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 13:44

Re: Froch is a class act

Post by teddy007 »

charlieb wrote:I love Froch in interviews. He just will not give an inch. Cracks me up.

When some fighters make claims that most would view as arrogant, I'm sure a lot of it's said knowingly, almost with a wink. They're selling themselves, playing the part of a confident athlete. With Froch, it's just this complete tunnel vision and involuntary, unknowing confidence that prevents him from seeing anything that doesn't fit Froch logic.

Carl Froch does not see the funny side of Carl Froch, for everyone else it's just comedy gold.
:TU:
FLINT ISLAND
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10 Feb 2009, 17:12

Re: Froch is a class act

Post by FLINT ISLAND »

NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:"come on Joe it's only boxin" :lol:
Froch has got a good perspective on things with that comment though as opposed to Calzaghe I think

Forch is undefeated

Calzaghe is undefeated

when they fight somebodys 0 must go and lose their perfect record

with Calzaghe I think he would be alot more concerned about this than Froch

Calzaghe is all precious about his perfect 46-0 record - and wants to remain untarnished

but Froch is basically saying - why I you so scared of losing your undefeated record - Froch is not scared

Froch is willing to put it on the line

Its only boxing

so what if Calzaghe lost a fight

he still got a nice girlfriend - nice kids - nice house - plenty of money in the bank - a good life

its only boxing Joe - dont be scared of losing that perfect record - its not the end of the world
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5455
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Froch is a class act

Post by forcefraser »

Calzaghe has retired. Leave him be I say. He was what he was, although not to everyone`s taste (WBO Champ).

Still, he has done well out of the sport, his head is not mashed up yet, so why should he bother coming back? Unless he is strapped for cash, which he should not be.
Post Reply