
Cold, but accurate.
I thought that (perhaps Bennie is right after all). Claude was hyping this up to be a fight for the ages. He was right I suppose, but only for the reason that it saw a future alltime P4P great (and anyone who disputes this is an idiot) give a punch perfect performance.chinny wrote:Credit to BN more often than not the cover photo's are excellent.
Did anyone else pick up on Abrams' comment in the preview that the 'undercard is stacks up almost as impressively as the main event'?
That would have been a wierd remark even if he hadn't immediately previewed three mismatches!
Fair point Bennie, but headlines and shock snaps sell in the current era whether you are a tabloid or magazine. Even late editions of the broadsheets had front page snaps of Didier Drogba cussing at the refbennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."
Really? I'm sure Harry must have run some similar shots, sometimes a photo just says it all. I think this cover is one of the better ones ( got to admit, I'm not a big fan of some of those recent BN covers that seem to relish showing up close cuts, in all their bloody glory, blood everywhere, mainly cause if I'm reading it on the tube, I get fellow passengers looking at me like I'm possibly a serial killer, ho ho ) Not that I buy it any longer.bennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."
bennie, I don't agree at all. It happened. It's a fantastic, dramatic shot of the triumph and dispair which is a huge part of what the sport is all about.bennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."
bennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."
good postDeserter wrote:bennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."It's boxing, a sport well known for its KOs... and boxing fans happen to love KOs.. and given it's a consumer magazine (not a trade magazine) I don't understand your point. The only time I'd agree with your sentiment is if the fighter in questions subsuquently sustained serious injury, but given that at the point they went to press Hatton was already back on the booze and hanging out at the pool I fail to see why they shouldn't use an image that instantly captures the totality of his defeat.
Yeah Good Postsweetscience wrote:good postDeserter wrote:bennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."It's boxing, a sport well known for its KOs... and boxing fans happen to love KOs.. and given it's a consumer magazine (not a trade magazine) I don't understand your point. The only time I'd agree with your sentiment is if the fighter in questions subsuquently sustained serious injury, but given that at the point they went to press Hatton was already back on the booze and hanging out at the pool I fail to see why they shouldn't use an image that instantly captures the totality of his defeat.
I guess its how you view boxing, some see it as a beautifull art others as a brutal confrontation ..bennie wrote:You should NEVER show a man down like this. This was Harry Mullan's golden rule. Boxing News, however, ceased to be the 'trade' mag some time ago. "Hi, I'm Sheriff John Bunnell..."
It's right morally, but is it what the fans want to see? Will it sell Boxing News mags?Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:doesnt sit too right with me either
Just show Manny celebrating, on top of the world, capture the joy of boxing, not the danger
right?
Chambers2 wrote:It's right morally, but is it what the fans want to see?:DKhaosai-Galaxy wrote:doesnt sit too right with me either
Just show Manny celebrating, on top of the world, capture the joy of boxing, not the danger
right?
yeah a silly moment from jim watt.doctorboxing wrote:If Hatton had suffered serious injury from this then don't show it, fair enough, but he didn't. The aim of the sport is to KO your opponent, so why should we, as fans of the sport, be squeamish about showing a KO'd fighter who recovered fully?
On that point - SKY's coverage was disgraceful. The commentators were criticizing Manny for celebrating at the same time as constantly showing close up images of a potentially seriously hurt Hatton as well as showing his distraught missus! How they had the cheek to criticize Manny was unbelievable.