Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post Reply

Who Would Win

Jack Sharkey
7
30%
Vitali Klitschko
16
70%
 
Total votes: 23

zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by zojo »

Lowest KO % of any heavyweight champ vs. highest KO% of any heavyweight champ
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by HomicideHenry »

The consistant Sharkey circles rings around Vitali. The inconsistant Sharkey either fouls out or gets KTFO. Heads, Sharkey, Tails, Klitschko =flips a coin= Whaddya know? :oo Sharkey! :TU:
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Robinson »

HH
Then give Sharkey a vote in the poll :)
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by HomicideHenry »

done! :TU:
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Robinson »

The Boston Gob needs your vote :)
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by zojo »

Robinson wrote:The Boston Gob needs your vote :)

What exactly is a "Gob" anyways?

When I wikipediaed the term I got this:

Gob may refer to:

* Mouth
* Whoopie pie, a type of dessert food
* Gob (band), a punk band from Vancouver, BC, Canada
* Gob, the king of the gnomes in folklore
* Gob or boney piles, low-coal-content waste from coal mining operations
* Gob, a cylinder of molten glass used in the Glass Container Industry
* Gob (mining), a cavity behind a longwall (See Longwall mining.)
* Gob games, a game development company
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4801
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by wouter »

zojo, wrote: What exactly is a "Gob" anyways?
A gob is a sailor.
Flump
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2702
Joined: 14 May 2006, 14:11

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Flump »

I think if Carnera 'knocks out' Sharkey then you have to fancy the similarly proportioned but more talented Klitschko to do the same.
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by zojo »

wouter wrote:
zojo, wrote: What exactly is a "Gob" anyways?
A gob is a sailor.
Thanks!
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Robinson »

Gob and Gobbie means something else here in Oz.
But I am certain that Sharkey did not get that name
for such exploits.
Atleast I hope not.
Diamond WEAPON
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1729
Joined: 19 Nov 2006, 01:32

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Diamond WEAPON »

Vitali beats Sharkey's ass and stops him after a few rounds. Vitali's a very skilled boxer technically despite looking awkward and he's way too big and strong.
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by overhand_right »

Sharkey was beautiful to watch, sure he was all about the money & didn't really go for the kayo (did Sharkey kill a man early in his career, can't recall), but i think he's just too crafty for Klitschko.

Klitscho has made his name fighting overweight lumbering types with a mean age of 40, difficul to imagine how he'd cope with young fast crafty 200 lb heavies who could fight 15 rds because hes such a slow clumsy fighter who telegraphs his shots.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Ezzard »

overhand_right wrote:Sharkey was beautiful to watch, sure he was all about the money & didn't really go for the kayo (did Sharkey kill a man early in his career, can't recall), but i think he's just too crafty for Klitschko.

Klitscho has made his name fighting overweight lumbering types with a mean age of 40, difficul to imagine how he'd cope with young fast crafty 200 lb heavies who could fight 15 rds because hes such a slow clumsy fighter who telegraphs his shots.
I think you and I see the intangibles the same I just think Vitali has enough to win. The big man is very durable and I can imagine him taking punishment early on but equalising with his right before taking over for a late stoppage.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by dempseyfire »

I agree with Overhand. Sharkey at his peak was as slick as Byrd but a much better hitter and offensive fighter. I see Vitali having success early but not keeping up with the pace Jack would set over 15 rounds.
overhand_right
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by overhand_right »

Ezzard wrote:
overhand_right wrote:Sharkey was beautiful to watch, sure he was all about the money & didn't really go for the kayo (did Sharkey kill a man early in his career, can't recall), but i think he's just too crafty for Klitschko.

Klitscho has made his name fighting overweight lumbering types with a mean age of 40, difficul to imagine how he'd cope with young fast crafty 200 lb heavies who could fight 15 rds because hes such a slow clumsy fighter who telegraphs his shots.
I think you and I see the intangibles the same I just think Vitali has enough to win. The big man is very durable and I can imagine him taking punishment early on but equalising with his right before taking over for a late stoppage.

Difficult to imagine this panning out since Klitschkos late stoppages are uniformaly over hugely overweight lardballs, most of whom were around 40 years of age with the exception of Sam Peter and Danny Williams, neither of whom ever learned head movement of defense.

The 'smallest' man Vitali has faced was a 210 lb Chris Byrd, who wasn't even cut at 210 lb -- he probably would be at 200 lb. Vitali certainly failed to smash Byrd up, who he found more trying than his ponderous 250 lb fatty punch bags that he usually feasts on.

Sharkey on the other hand, ignoring the fishy second fight, took on Carnera who had a whopping 60 lb weight advantage, which unsurprisingly didn't benefit him much as Sharkey was able to both deck him & box circles around him for 15 rds.

Cant really see how Klitschko would fare over 15 rds at a pace against a tough trying opponent, as he was gaping for air against Juan Carlos Gomez (37 yrs old and 30 lbs overweight) and even Corrie Sanders (38 yrs old and so fat he could only muster a few potshots before resting before launching another attack)

Certainly with the big giant, Sharkey doesn't need to worry about a guy who can step into close range & unleash a 3 or 4 punch volley of blink-and-you-miss-them knockout shots like he would do with Joe Louis and those faster & more technically adept guys.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Who Would Win - Sharkey vs. V. Klitschko

Post by Ezzard »

Agree that the 15 rounds and pace would be trouble for Vitali. Byrd's victory was totally legitimate of course but if they had fougth again my money would have been on Vitali.

Sharkey was better than Byrd though.

I believe that the Klitschkos are geuninely good heavyweights who hold their own against most.
Post Reply