Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Poncey »

Who wins?
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by The_Don1 »

I'm betting Guzman struggles to make weight, pulls out shortly before the fight and announces his move up to welterweight, patterns repeats itself until he eventually settles at super middleweight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by crusader »

He's already done that. I have a hunch that Sakio Bika is actually Joan Guzman
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Poncey »

Nah, Guzman's woman doesn't look like a man.
Image
KNOCKOUT KING
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26
Joined: 14 Feb 2004, 18:19

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by KNOCKOUT KING »

..........
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Wales »

Guzman UD, great fighter, wasted talent.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Wow huge Guzman fan, been very impressed with Bradley too who might just be a sleeping giant himself. No idea how Guzman will handle 140 but he's weighed 147 on fight night looking in good condition so I'll stick my neck out and say he handles it well, realises its his last big shot and come in great shape. Guzman is the superior boxer, so:

Guzman UD 8-4 (if its fair judging)
RLewis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 166
Joined: 31 Oct 2008, 07:34

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by RLewis »

Bradley beats him out of sight
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Counter-puncher »

agree RLewis. tho i am biased towards bradley. i like him.

Guzman is the more skilled but he's going to be fighting someone bigger and more relentless than anyone he's yet seen. he'll be ringrusty and its not the fight to be getting over that.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Old bones Ian »

Guzman won't turn up
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Its been rejected by the WBO, TWATS
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Counter-puncher »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Its been rejected by the WBO, TWATS
haha. thats the definition of irony.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13416
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by jameswilson »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Its been rejected by the WBO, TWATS
haha. thats the definition of irony.
It sure is.

They don't want this but they will accept Enzo Maccrinelli vs Bobby Gunn.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Autobarn »

hopefully it'll be juan diaz v guzman, which was in the rumour mill recently. then we might see guzman get a bit of a beating, as diaz can get on top of a fighter pretty quickly.

not sure what guzman would have been like at 140. (i think he went over lightweight limit once and was very slappy and negative, v jauregei?). bradley is nothing special and doesn't hit any harder than many 135-pounders. bradley-guzman was not a fight i wanted to happen, so i won't complain about this.

WBO could have sanctioned bradley-guzman - guzman potentially could have become a "4 weight world champion" (all WBO titles, whihc makes you wonder why they didn't go for it).
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by DG. »

Guzmans mother just passed away according to fiight news.

Very sad.

RIP.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Chambers2 »

RIP


Guzman's a special fighter IMO, he'd box Bradleys ears off blindfolded
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by DG. »

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Nah, Guzman's woman doesn't look like a man.
Image
Seeing as that picture is of Sakio Bikanand his woman it is hard to tell!

Or are you saying Bika's woman looks like a man?

:lol:
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Asterix »

Guzman, on his day, is a fantastic boxer. I can see an argument for either boxer winning. I hope that it's Bradley, though, as I hate Guzman's style.
caffrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 16 Sep 2008, 15:52

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by caffrey »

guzman would outbox anyone apart from the very best,he has truly outstanding skills . By all acounts he has a poor attitude in regards to training and preparation hence his weight making antics.I dont think he ll have the opportunity to prove how good he is.
Captain Hook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4730
Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Captain Hook »

Guzman is way, way better than Bradley IMO

Sad news about his mum..
briantracy09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by briantracy09 »

That bird is pig ugly.

I think Guzman will play with Bradley and KO him easy. Brad was pretty shaken up by Holt. Guzman is in another league entirely.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Counter-puncher »

am i right in saying Guzman hasn't KO'd anyone in about his last 10 fights though, or at least since he went north of 122lbs.....?

EDIT: yes i am right. i thought so.

it's always confused me the confidence people have shown in Guzman stopping various mooted opponents over the last 2 years, though the fact that Guzman never actually makes the fight makes them easy predictions to make with little chance of being proved wrong.

ok so he may be streets ahead of bradley skillwise, but in terms of fitness, attitude, etc bradley has him there i think.

and so what, if Holt had Bradley on the deck? Holt's a big puncher, who actually has knockouts of people bigger than Agapito fricken Sanchez on his record, Bradley ran into a cracking left hook, and was up and fighting back in short order.

i think Bradley would do this on workrate and pressure, when Guzman's 35 punches a round don't stop him or have him backing off he'll end up taking rounds just like he did off Witter, IMO.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45235
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Bridge too far for Guzman, if he had discipline he wouldn't be fighting at 140.
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by harrygreb »

bradley has impressed me too. he wins convincingly.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Bradley v Guzman August 1st

Post by Asterix »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Bridge too far for Guzman, if he had discipline he wouldn't be fighting at 140.
I'm not so sure it's all because of discipline. He seems like one of those fighters who drained so much that he's now jumping up weight divisions quickly because his body won't accept anything else (just like with Pacquiao, whose body forced him up to lightweight, and even at lightweight he was a big drainer!)
Post Reply